有关项目管理方面,需要高手翻译一下英文论文,急!! 20
OpportunitiesforFurtherRefitiementAlthoughthedescriptivestatisticswithintbispaperprov...
Opportunities for Further Refitiement
Although the descriptive statistics within tbis paper provides
some useful insights into the changes that have occurred—
and not occurred—in how participant organizations
approach developing and applying project management, it
frankly raises as many if not more questions as it answers.
Many of the questions arise from an inability to support further
analysis of underlying causes—this is in part a challenge
created by the bencbmarking effort being largely
survey-based, without follow-on interviews, focus groups or
case studies to provide additional context in understanding
the choices and influences of organizations.
Some specific opportunities for furtber improvement of
tbis analysis include:
• Providing a more rigorous and comprehensive statistical
analysis of the underlying data. Although tbis
paper provides a descriptive analysis of tbe available
statistics, a more in-deptb statistical analysis could
provide additional information to support or refute
the inferences being drawn here.
• Encouraging repeat participation from a greater number
of organizations, providing a greater understanding of the longitudinal changes that occur within a
sufficiently large subset of participating organizations.
• Including a greater degree of follow-up witb participants
to verify and validate the results being selfreported.
Tbis could include a definition of more
concrete and specific measures for project results,
allowing a more granular understanding of tbe association
between described project management
processes and delivered project results. Tbe limitation
on the ability to gather this information, however, is
the degree to which organizations track and are able
to segment their project results to align with the
defined measures.
• Including greater understanding of tbe dynamics
occurring witbin organizations. Being able to build in
more of this context would belp answer many of the
questions underlying why changes were being
observed tbat could not be answered in the current
dataset.
• Looking at tbe outside influences on the organization,
in terms of its economic environment, marketplace
and competitive pressures. Understanding the market
context will help to provide a better understanding of
how these factors also infiuence observed results. 展开
Although the descriptive statistics within tbis paper provides
some useful insights into the changes that have occurred—
and not occurred—in how participant organizations
approach developing and applying project management, it
frankly raises as many if not more questions as it answers.
Many of the questions arise from an inability to support further
analysis of underlying causes—this is in part a challenge
created by the bencbmarking effort being largely
survey-based, without follow-on interviews, focus groups or
case studies to provide additional context in understanding
the choices and influences of organizations.
Some specific opportunities for furtber improvement of
tbis analysis include:
• Providing a more rigorous and comprehensive statistical
analysis of the underlying data. Although tbis
paper provides a descriptive analysis of tbe available
statistics, a more in-deptb statistical analysis could
provide additional information to support or refute
the inferences being drawn here.
• Encouraging repeat participation from a greater number
of organizations, providing a greater understanding of the longitudinal changes that occur within a
sufficiently large subset of participating organizations.
• Including a greater degree of follow-up witb participants
to verify and validate the results being selfreported.
Tbis could include a definition of more
concrete and specific measures for project results,
allowing a more granular understanding of tbe association
between described project management
processes and delivered project results. Tbe limitation
on the ability to gather this information, however, is
the degree to which organizations track and are able
to segment their project results to align with the
defined measures.
• Including greater understanding of tbe dynamics
occurring witbin organizations. Being able to build in
more of this context would belp answer many of the
questions underlying why changes were being
observed tbat could not be answered in the current
dataset.
• Looking at tbe outside influences on the organization,
in terms of its economic environment, marketplace
and competitive pressures. Understanding the market
context will help to provide a better understanding of
how these factors also infiuence observed results. 展开
1个回答
2007-01-10
展开全部
如有机会refitiement虽然在描述统计tbis提供一些有用的参考文件发生的变化,并没有出现在参加组织如何发展和运用项目管理的办法, 坦言如果不是更引起了许多问题,因为它的答案. 许多问题产生无法支持进一步分析原因,这是第一个挑战是很大努力创造的bencbmarking调查为本 没有后续的面谈, 焦点团体或个案研究方面提供更多的选择和了解影响组织. 一些具体的改进机会furtbertbis分析包括: ●提供了更为严格而全面的统计分析的基本数据. 虽然tbis文件描述分析提供了极高的统计数字, 更多的统计分析,可以提供更多的资料deptb支持或反驳论断被拉这里. ●鼓励更多的重复参与组织 为更多地了解发生的变化,在纵向宽敞子参与组织. ●包括更大程度的后续witb参与者核实结果作为自我认知和验证. tbis定义可以包括更具体的项目和具体措施的成果, 让更多的了解沉积岩颗粒交往过程作了阐述项目管理项目成果. 沉积岩的集聚能力受到限制这一情况,但 该组织是在多大程度上能够部分田径项目的成绩,以符合规定的措施. ●包括更多了解发生的动态推断witbin组织. 能够建立在这一方面将更为belp回答许多问题根本原因正在变化观察tbat不能回答在目前的数据. ●看看外面蚀影响的组织,在经济环境和市场竞争压力. 了解市场情况,提供有助了解这些因素又如何尿路观察结果.
推荐律师服务:
若未解决您的问题,请您详细描述您的问题,通过百度律临进行免费专业咨询