英译汉，谢谢
COGNITIVEDISTORTIONSANDLOGICALFALLACIES（认知和逻辑障碍）Cognitivedistortionsandlogicalfallaci...
COGNITIVE DISTORTIONS AND LOGICAL FALLACIES（认知和逻辑障碍）
Cognitive distortions and logical fallacies are related to an individual's culture, gender, background, and personal experiences and are barriers to meaningful communication. Individuals often can not separate moods, thoughts, and perceptions, for they become interconnected in one continuous evaluation process, involving feeling, thinking, and responding. In times of increased stress, as is common in health care settings, it is likely that people will employ faulty thinking that affects the communication process. Recognition of distortions and faulty logic will promote effective communication and save a lot of confusion or even prevent conflict. Box 17-1 presents examples of common cognitive distortions; following are examples of logical fallacies that are frequently encountered. For more information on logical fallacies,
Ad Hominem Abusive
Ad hominem abusive is an argument that attacks the person instead of the issue. The speaker hopes to discredit the other person by calling attention to some irrelevant fact about that per¬son. Perhaps a nurse has just had a disagreement with a physician about lab results that were not properly reported. The nurse makes the following comment to colleagues: "She thinks she's so smart just because she's a doctor." What does that have to do with the disagreement? Nothing. It is an unwarranted attack on the physician. Does it accomplish the purpose? Very likely, the group will be influenced by the disparaging comment. They may even become angry at the physician who had legitimate cause to be upset about not receiving lab results. Ultimately the issue of unreported lab values is lost in the attack against the physician.
麻烦不要机器翻译哦 展开
Cognitive distortions and logical fallacies are related to an individual's culture, gender, background, and personal experiences and are barriers to meaningful communication. Individuals often can not separate moods, thoughts, and perceptions, for they become interconnected in one continuous evaluation process, involving feeling, thinking, and responding. In times of increased stress, as is common in health care settings, it is likely that people will employ faulty thinking that affects the communication process. Recognition of distortions and faulty logic will promote effective communication and save a lot of confusion or even prevent conflict. Box 17-1 presents examples of common cognitive distortions; following are examples of logical fallacies that are frequently encountered. For more information on logical fallacies,
Ad Hominem Abusive
Ad hominem abusive is an argument that attacks the person instead of the issue. The speaker hopes to discredit the other person by calling attention to some irrelevant fact about that per¬son. Perhaps a nurse has just had a disagreement with a physician about lab results that were not properly reported. The nurse makes the following comment to colleagues: "She thinks she's so smart just because she's a doctor." What does that have to do with the disagreement? Nothing. It is an unwarranted attack on the physician. Does it accomplish the purpose? Very likely, the group will be influenced by the disparaging comment. They may even become angry at the physician who had legitimate cause to be upset about not receiving lab results. Ultimately the issue of unreported lab values is lost in the attack against the physician.
麻烦不要机器翻译哦 展开
1个回答
展开全部
你好 以下为本人手工制作
COGNITIVE DISTORTIONS AND LOGICAL FALLACIES（认知和逻辑障碍）
Cognitive distortions and logical fallacies are related to an individual's culture, gender, background, and personal experiences and are barriers to meaningful communication.
认知和逻辑障碍（的形成）与个体所处的文化，其性别，其所处背景以及个人经历都有关系，并且（认知和逻辑障碍）是良好，有意义的沟通的障碍。
Individuals often can not separate moods, thoughts, and perceptions, for they become interconnected in one continuous evaluation process, involving feeling, thinking, and responding.
个人往往不能分开的情绪、想法和观点，因为它们在你连续的评估过程中互相联系的起来，涉及感觉，思考和反应。
In times of increased stress, as is common in health care settings, it is likely that people will employ faulty thinking that affects the communication process.
在压力增大的时候，正如在卫生保健机构中常见的那样，人们很可能会进行错误的思考进而影响交流沟通的过程 。
附：in times of 在……的时候
Recognition of distortions and faulty logic will promote effective communication and save a lot of confusion or even prevent conflict.
对于曲解和错误逻辑的认知可以有效地促进交流，并避免了很多误解，（有时）甚至能够避免冲突。
Box 17-1 presents examples of common cognitive distortions;
Box 17-1 展示了常见的认知曲解的一些例子；
following are examples of logical fallacies that are frequently encountered.
以下为常见逻辑谬误的一些例子。
For more information on logical fallacies,
想要了解更多关于逻辑谬误的信息，
Ad Hominem Abusive
（这个没法直译吧，或者我才疏学浅，确实不知道）
Ad hominem abusive is an argument that attacks the person instead of the issue.
Ad hominem abusive 是一种以攻击他人取代攻击事件的一种辩论（方法？技巧？）
The speaker hopes to discredit the other person by calling attention to some irrelevant fact about that person.
发言者借讨论与事件无关而与他人有关的事情以期搞臭他人。
Perhaps a nurse has just had a disagreement with a physician about lab results that were not properly reported.
也许一位护士刚刚和一位医师就未适当报道的试验结果起了分歧。
The nurse makes the following comment to colleagues: "She thinks she's so smart just because she's a doctor."
那位护士对其同事作了一下评论：“她认为她自己是如此聪明就因为她是位医生。”
What does that have to do with the disagreement? Nothing.
这样的评论与那分歧有何关系？没有一点关系。
It is an unwarranted attack on the physician.
这是对那位医生的一次毫无根据的攻击。
Does it accomplish the purpose? Very likely, the group will be influenced by the disparaging comment.
但这（攻击）会达到预期效果吗？非常可能，整个群体（应该是护士的群体）都会被这诽谤的评论所影响。
They may even become angry at the physician who had legitimate cause to be upset about not receiving lab results.
他们甚至还有可能对这位医生感到愤怒，而这位医生则为有正当的理由却未受到试验结果而感到沮丧。
Ultimately the issue of unreported lab values is lost in the attack against the physician.
最终，这本来关于那未报道的实验室评估的事件会在对那位医师猛烈的攻击中被人们所渐渐遗忘。
希望对你有帮助
COGNITIVE DISTORTIONS AND LOGICAL FALLACIES（认知和逻辑障碍）
Cognitive distortions and logical fallacies are related to an individual's culture, gender, background, and personal experiences and are barriers to meaningful communication.
认知和逻辑障碍（的形成）与个体所处的文化，其性别，其所处背景以及个人经历都有关系，并且（认知和逻辑障碍）是良好，有意义的沟通的障碍。
Individuals often can not separate moods, thoughts, and perceptions, for they become interconnected in one continuous evaluation process, involving feeling, thinking, and responding.
个人往往不能分开的情绪、想法和观点，因为它们在你连续的评估过程中互相联系的起来，涉及感觉，思考和反应。
In times of increased stress, as is common in health care settings, it is likely that people will employ faulty thinking that affects the communication process.
在压力增大的时候，正如在卫生保健机构中常见的那样，人们很可能会进行错误的思考进而影响交流沟通的过程 。
附：in times of 在……的时候
Recognition of distortions and faulty logic will promote effective communication and save a lot of confusion or even prevent conflict.
对于曲解和错误逻辑的认知可以有效地促进交流，并避免了很多误解，（有时）甚至能够避免冲突。
Box 17-1 presents examples of common cognitive distortions;
Box 17-1 展示了常见的认知曲解的一些例子；
following are examples of logical fallacies that are frequently encountered.
以下为常见逻辑谬误的一些例子。
For more information on logical fallacies,
想要了解更多关于逻辑谬误的信息，
Ad Hominem Abusive
（这个没法直译吧，或者我才疏学浅，确实不知道）
Ad hominem abusive is an argument that attacks the person instead of the issue.
Ad hominem abusive 是一种以攻击他人取代攻击事件的一种辩论（方法？技巧？）
The speaker hopes to discredit the other person by calling attention to some irrelevant fact about that person.
发言者借讨论与事件无关而与他人有关的事情以期搞臭他人。
Perhaps a nurse has just had a disagreement with a physician about lab results that were not properly reported.
也许一位护士刚刚和一位医师就未适当报道的试验结果起了分歧。
The nurse makes the following comment to colleagues: "She thinks she's so smart just because she's a doctor."
那位护士对其同事作了一下评论：“她认为她自己是如此聪明就因为她是位医生。”
What does that have to do with the disagreement? Nothing.
这样的评论与那分歧有何关系？没有一点关系。
It is an unwarranted attack on the physician.
这是对那位医生的一次毫无根据的攻击。
Does it accomplish the purpose? Very likely, the group will be influenced by the disparaging comment.
但这（攻击）会达到预期效果吗？非常可能，整个群体（应该是护士的群体）都会被这诽谤的评论所影响。
They may even become angry at the physician who had legitimate cause to be upset about not receiving lab results.
他们甚至还有可能对这位医生感到愤怒，而这位医生则为有正当的理由却未受到试验结果而感到沮丧。
Ultimately the issue of unreported lab values is lost in the attack against the physician.
最终，这本来关于那未报道的实验室评估的事件会在对那位医师猛烈的攻击中被人们所渐渐遗忘。
希望对你有帮助
本回答由提问者推荐
已赞过
已踩过<
评论
收起
你对这个回答的评价是？
推荐律师服务：
若未解决您的问题，请您详细描述您的问题，通过百度律临进行免费专业咨询
