Question

急求英语翻译啊

As a result, immediately following the
acquittals the Minister of Justice announced the establishment of a working party
to look at the process of instruction, detention and the treatment of evidence from
child victims. The objective was to see what lessons might be learned from the
case, in order to avoid such a situation reoccurring. The report was published in
February 2005 (Viout, 2005) and recommended the appointment of two juges
d’instruction in complex and sensitive cases, in order that the workload could be
shared and theories and ideas cross-checked, thus avoiding the ‘tunnel vision’ of
case construction. Implicitly, this recognises the limitation of the defence role. The
lawyer is unable to participate in a way that might effectively displace the case theory
and assumptions of the juge d’instruction.
In cases supervised by the procureur, it is very much more difficult for the
defence to play any part in the investigation, or to have any impact on the construction
of the dossier. Her role during the GAV is limited to a 30 minute consultation
with the suspect (the nature of which is discussed below), and many
cases are then listed for trial shortly afterwards, effectively closing the investigation.
In non-instruction cases, the avocat’s role tends to focus on accompanying
the accused if she is brought before the procureur121 and representing her in bail
hearings. Field and West observed some informal exchanges resulting in mutual
concessions, but this depended upon the avocat having a degree of trust in, and
some form of personal relationship with, the procureur. Such exchanges were the
exception rather than the rule:
Any image of a dossier constructed on the basis of real dialogue between prosecutor and
defence with the latter using a reading of the dossier and client interview to prompt the
prosecutor to order further investigations was a long way from reality. (Field and West,
2003:295)
The Defence Role at Trial
This narrow understanding of the defence function also extends to the avocat’s
role at trial, where she was considered by many procureurs to have little effect upon
the case outcome. Instead, her value was more in giving the appearance of representation
both to the defendant and the outside world:
I think that, unfortunately, the lawyer does not know a great deal. Sometimes there are
aspects of the accused’s personality which they might play on.

Answer 1

因此搭念,紧接
犯罪嫌疑人被无罪释放正义部长宣布建立一个工作小组
看的教学过程、拘留及治疗的证据
孩子的受害者。,我们的目标就是看看可能从中学到了教训
情况下,为了避免这种情况下复发。这份报告刊登在
2005年2月(Viout 2005年出版)和推荐两juges的任命
在复杂的'instruction,d敏感案件,以便工作量
共享和理论和观点,这样就避免了交叉检查的视野的
案例建设。隐式,该认识到了限制国防的作用。这
律师是不能参加一种方式,如何有效地取代了案例理论
与假设的'instruction juge d。
在这种情况下procureur监督,很更难了
国防打参加调查,或影响到建设
的档案。她的角色在GAV仅限于30分渗枝乎钟的咨询
同嫌疑犯(它的性质在下面被谈论),许多
病例首先列出审判不久,有效地关闭的调查。
在non-instruction情况下,avocat的作用往往集中在伴随
被告如果她带到这个procureur121代表她在保释
听证会。场和西观察一些英语交流造成的相互影响
的让步,但这有赖于avocat有一定程度的信任,和
某种形式的人际关系,procureur。这种交流是
例外情况,而非规则:
任何的形象是一个档案真正的基础上建构检察官和对话
则采用的防线的阅读档案和客户访问提示
检察官订购进一步的调查是一个离现实还有很丛悉远。(场和西部,
2003:295)
国防作用的审判
这条狭窄的叔叔
大概就是这个意思哈 呵呵 希望可以帮上你哦

Answer 2

因此,紧接
犯罪嫌疑人被无罪释放正义部长宣布建立一个工作小组
看的教学过程、拘留及治疗的证据
孩子的受芹胡害者。,我们的目标就是看看可能从中学到了教训
情况下,为了避免这种情况下复发。这份报告刊登在
2005年2月(Viout 2005年出版)和推荐两juges的任命
在复杂的'instruction,d敏感案件,以便工作量
共享和理论和观点,这样就避免了交叉检查的视野的
案例建设。隐式,该认识到了限制国防的作用。这
律师是不能参加一种方式,如何有效地取代了案例理论
与假设的'instruction juge d。
在这种情况下procureur监督,很更难了
国防打参加调查,或影响到建设
的档案。她的角色在GAV仅限于30分钟的咨询
同嫌疑犯(它的性质在下面被谈论),许多
病例首先列出审判不久,有效地关闭的调查。
在non-instruction情况下,avocat的作用往往集中在伴随
被告如果她带到这个procureur121代表她在保释
听证会。场和西观察一些英语交旦碰流造成的相互影响
的让步,但这有赖于avocat有一定程度的信任,和
某种形式的人际关系,procureur。这种交流是
例外情况,而非规则:
任何模首谈的形象是一个档案真正的基础上建构检察官和对话
则采用的防线的阅读档案和客户访问提示
检察官订购进一步的调查是一个离现实还有很远。(场和西部,
2003:295)
国防作用的审判
这条狭窄的叔叔