请教SAT语法,谢谢!
ThePonyExpresswasaningenioussystemforcarrying"mail;itwasinexistenceonlybriefly,howeve...
The Pony Express was an ingenious system for carrying "mail; it was in existence only briefly, however," before the telegraph system made it obsolete.
引号部分为画线部分
A.mail; it was in existence only briefly, however,
D.mail, having existed only briefly
答案说这道题选A,请问A中的it是指"The Pony Express"吗?
为什么D答案不对呢,在SAT语法中,有一条规则:subject+verb+object, doing(逗号后面的doing修饰主语subject) 所以我认为D中的having existed...修饰“The Pony Express",不对吗? 展开
引号部分为画线部分
A.mail; it was in existence only briefly, however,
D.mail, having existed only briefly
答案说这道题选A,请问A中的it是指"The Pony Express"吗?
为什么D答案不对呢,在SAT语法中,有一条规则:subject+verb+object, doing(逗号后面的doing修饰主语subject) 所以我认为D中的having existed...修饰“The Pony Express",不对吗? 展开
2个回答
展开全部
这个句子是由分号分隔的两个并列句。
第二分句 it was in existence only briefly, however," before the telegraph system made it obsolete 中,the telegraph system made it obsolete 的代词 it 显然是指代 Pony Express,也就是说是由于 telegraph system(电报系统)的出现才使得 Pony Express不再使用,因此 in existence only briefly(存在时间很短暂)当然也应该指代 Pony Express。
而在名词后用逗号分隔的分词短语相当于一个非限制性定语从句,其作用是就近对该名词给予补充说明,因此 having existed 是用来说明 mail 的,而不是 Pony Express,(等于 the mail had existed only briefly before …)。这样,句子的意思就变成了“在电报系统使得传递邮件不再使用以前,邮件只存在了很短暂的一段时间”,这显然是不符合事实的。
因此,答案 D 不对站不住脚,不能成立。
第二分句 it was in existence only briefly, however," before the telegraph system made it obsolete 中,the telegraph system made it obsolete 的代词 it 显然是指代 Pony Express,也就是说是由于 telegraph system(电报系统)的出现才使得 Pony Express不再使用,因此 in existence only briefly(存在时间很短暂)当然也应该指代 Pony Express。
而在名词后用逗号分隔的分词短语相当于一个非限制性定语从句,其作用是就近对该名词给予补充说明,因此 having existed 是用来说明 mail 的,而不是 Pony Express,(等于 the mail had existed only briefly before …)。这样,句子的意思就变成了“在电报系统使得传递邮件不再使用以前,邮件只存在了很短暂的一段时间”,这显然是不符合事实的。
因此,答案 D 不对站不住脚,不能成立。
更多追问追答
追问
thank you, but how do you explain this: "subject+verb+object, doing, 逗号后面的doing修饰主语subject, 不对吗?
追答
In the prase "subject + verb + object, doing...", the -ing form is a present participle and is used to additional remark the object; therefore, its logic subject is the object of the sentence rather than the subject. If such a form is used to modify the subject, the phrase must be changed into "subject, doing... + verb + object, "
It seems that I have explained it clearly in my Chinese explanation above: 而在名词后用逗号分隔的分词短语相当于一个非限制性定语从句,其作用是就近对该名词给予补充说明,因此 having existed 是用来说明 mail 的,而不是 Pony Express,(等于 the mail had existed only briefly before …)。这样,句子的意思就变成了“在电报系统使得传递邮件不再使用以前,邮件只存在了很短暂的一段时间”,这显然是不符合事实的。
推荐律师服务:
若未解决您的问题,请您详细描述您的问题,通过百度律临进行免费专业咨询