Question

高手进来帮忙翻译一下！！！（机译勿进）

Data which seem to be in poor agreement can produce quite high correlations. For example, Serfontein and Jaroszewicz 2 compared two methods of measuring gestational age.Babies with a gestational age of 35 weeks by one method had gestations between 34 and 39.5
weeks by the other, but r was high (0.85). On the other hand, Oldham et al. 3 compared the mini and large Wright peak flow meters and found a correlation of 0.992. They then connected the meters in series, so that both measured the same flow, and obtained a "material improvement" (0.996). If a correlation coefficient of 0.99 can be materially improved upon, we need to rethink our ideas of what a high correlation is in this context. As we show below,
the high correlation of 0.94 for our own data conceals considerable lack of agreement between the two instruments.

Answer 1

楼主帖子还没发完啊？
Data which seem to be in poor agreement can produce quite high correlations. 符合性似乎很差的数据可能产生很高的相关性。For example, Serfontein and Jaroszewicz 2 compared two methods of measuring gestational age.例如，Serfontein and Jaroszewicz【2】 比较了两种测量胎龄的方法。Babies with a gestational age of 35 weeks by one method had gestations between 34 and 39.5 weeks by the other, but r was high (0.85). 胎龄35周的胎儿用一种方法，妊娠34和39.5周之间的用另一种方法。On the other hand, Oldham et al. 3 compared the mini and large Wright peak flow meters and found a correlation of 0.992. 另一方面，Oldham等人【3】比较了小型和大型赖特峰值流量计，并发现0.992的相关性。They then connected the meters in series, so that both measured the same flow, and obtained a "material improvement" (0.996).然后他们将仪表串联连接，这样两台仪表都测量同样的流量，并得到“实质性的改善”（0.996）。 If a correlation coefficient of 0.99 can be materially improved upon, we need to rethink our ideas of what a high correlation is in this context.如果0.99的相关系数能得到实质性的改善，那我们对在此背景下什么才是高的相关性的概念就需要重新思考了。 As we show below, the high correlation of 0.94 for our own data conceals considerable lack of agreement between the two instruments正如我们在下面证明的，对于我们自己的数据，0.94的高相关性掩盖了两台仪表之间符合性相当大的缺乏。

Answer 2

似乎在恶劣的协议的数据可能导致相当高交互作用。 为例子， Serfontein和Jaroszewicz 2比较了测量孕龄二个方法。婴孩以35个星期的孕龄由一个方法有怀孕在34和39.5之间
几星期由其他，但r高(0.85)。 另一方面，奥德翰等。 3 比较了微型和大怀特洪峰米并且发现了交互作用 0.992。 他们在系列然后连接了米，因此两个测量了同一流程，并且获得了“物质改善” (0.996)。 如果可以物质改进相关系数0.99，我们需要重新考虑高交互作用我们的想法在这上下文。 我们下面显示，
高交互作用0.94为我们自己的数据隐瞒可观的缺乏协议在二台仪器之间。