Question

请帮忙翻译一下下面这段话.急!急!急!

民事侵权关系中的因果关系,是困扰法院与学者的问题，在我国司法实践中有诸多民事侵权关系由于因果关系的理解与应用不同出现了归责不同的局面,本文通过实证分析不同类型的民事侵权案例来证明相当因果关系理论的可行性,通过对比分析应用不同类型的因果关系理论对案例的处理结果来说明相当因果关系的公平与价值性，同时将相当因果关系理论与法规目的学理论相结合分析得出其可行性,其核心内容为在损害后果属于法规保护的前提下，且行为是后果的必要条件,通过一般人的社会经验和认知水平去确定行为与后果之间的相当性.通过实证分析得出在民事侵权因果关系中相当性与法规目的性相结合是处理民事侵权关系中的因果关系问题的适当可行理论,在实际中能够充分体现出法律的公平与正义.

Answer 1

Tort in the relations between the causal relationship, the court is plagued with the problem of scholars in China's judicial practice in many tort because causal relationship between the different understanding and application of a different situation attribution, the paper through the empirical analysis of different types of civil Infringement case to prove a causal link between the theory of the feasibility, through comparative analysis of different types of causal link between the theory of the case to illustrate the results of a causal relationship between the equity and value, while a causal relationship between theory and the theory of the purpose of regulations Analyzed the feasibility of, the core content of damaging consequences for the protection of laws and regulations under the premise, and the consequences of the acts are necessary conditions for ordinary people through the social experience and to determine the level of cognitive behavior and the consequences of a sexual. Through empirical analysis that the tort of a causal relationship between sexual and regulations combined with the purpose of dealing with tort in the relations between the causal link between the issue of the appropriate viable theory, in practice can give full expression to the law of equity and justice

Answer 2

wa