英文电影观后感
3个回答
展开全部
Ice Age 冰河世纪 英语影评
It’s not particularly surprising to be disappointed by any computer-animated film not bearing the Pixar logo. In fact, until Shrek, 2001’s rollicking success, I wouldn’t have even believed it could happen. What is surprising, is that Ice Age doesn’t even ATTEMPT to reach Pixar’s Toy Story heights, apparently content to revel in its status as Monster’s, Inc.'s second rate, half wit cousin.
Ice Age is yet another “extinction for kids” movie, one of many in a long line of baby dinosaurs, pterodactyl eggs, and sympathetic cavemen. This time, it’s the ice age, and wooly mammoths roam the earth alongside primitive man. Strangely enough, in this early world, animals can talk, and humans cannot. But when a group of would-be-enemies discover a lost human baby, wooly mammoth (Ray Romano), saber-toothed tiger (Dennis Leary), and giant sloth (John Leguizamo) must work along side each other in a journey to return the child to its home.
Visually, Ice Age is perhaps the poorest bit of CGI I have ever seen. Contrasted to the beautiful constructs of Monsters, Inc.; or even the gooey, gloppy creativity of Shrek; Ice Age is nothing but badly rendered polygons and Acme animated characters. No hint of photo-realism here. It’s like comparing a Bugs Bunny Cartoon to The Lion King. Actually, I suspect that is exactly what the folks at Ice Age were going for.
Ice Age is really little more than a collection of silly animal gags and Leguizamo one liners. Some of them are even quite funny. If that is all that we’re going for here, then I suppose I’m all for it. But then there are these strange attempts at gut wrenching sappiness, which fall painfully flat amidst sub-video game animation. Frankly, I’m not even sure the CGI they use here is up to the task of displaying the kinds of emotions these people are trying to illicit from their characters. The humans more closely resemble totem poles than they do living, breathing, creatures. It’s laughable watching their polygon-limited faces trying to emote in response to the story’s attempts at heartfelt, soft touches.
Thankfully, the main characters are animals, which are at least bearably rendered to slapstick fun levels. As a result, what slapstick there is, is highly entertaining. Sure, Ray Romano’s vocal talents aren’t particularly spectacular. But Dennis Leary and the always-odd John Leguizamo cover for his mammoth ineptitude without hesitation.
The story itself is bland, boring, and uninspired, as is the almost laughably bad animation. The film’s only real saving graces are some slapstick side trips into the world of an unlucky squirrel and a group of soon-to-be-extinct melon-hoarding dodos. Ice Age’s comedy is worthy of Bugs, but unless you’re under 5, you’ll be bored with everything else.
看看行不行
《冒牌天神2》观后感:
This should've gone straight to video. Evan Almighty was not able to manage the expectations of those who came to see it anticipating as riotous a ride as its predecessor Bruce Almighty. It retained the premise of the original as a spin-off but it doesn't work not because Steve Carell is less talented than Jim Carrey but because he had lousy material to work with. Even Morgan Freeman (who reprises his role as God) lost the zing and impressive qualities he had in the first installment.
Evan Almighty apparently targets a family audience with its decidedly more religious overtones (check out what ARK really means), so it shouldn't have attempted to fool the audience by maintaining the Almighty franchise because it doesn't fit; its brand of humor and story simply failed to keep up.
It would've probably done better if it were marketed differently instead of lazily riding on the success of Bruce Almighty when it painfully couldn't deliver the same punches.
It’s not particularly surprising to be disappointed by any computer-animated film not bearing the Pixar logo. In fact, until Shrek, 2001’s rollicking success, I wouldn’t have even believed it could happen. What is surprising, is that Ice Age doesn’t even ATTEMPT to reach Pixar’s Toy Story heights, apparently content to revel in its status as Monster’s, Inc.'s second rate, half wit cousin.
Ice Age is yet another “extinction for kids” movie, one of many in a long line of baby dinosaurs, pterodactyl eggs, and sympathetic cavemen. This time, it’s the ice age, and wooly mammoths roam the earth alongside primitive man. Strangely enough, in this early world, animals can talk, and humans cannot. But when a group of would-be-enemies discover a lost human baby, wooly mammoth (Ray Romano), saber-toothed tiger (Dennis Leary), and giant sloth (John Leguizamo) must work along side each other in a journey to return the child to its home.
Visually, Ice Age is perhaps the poorest bit of CGI I have ever seen. Contrasted to the beautiful constructs of Monsters, Inc.; or even the gooey, gloppy creativity of Shrek; Ice Age is nothing but badly rendered polygons and Acme animated characters. No hint of photo-realism here. It’s like comparing a Bugs Bunny Cartoon to The Lion King. Actually, I suspect that is exactly what the folks at Ice Age were going for.
Ice Age is really little more than a collection of silly animal gags and Leguizamo one liners. Some of them are even quite funny. If that is all that we’re going for here, then I suppose I’m all for it. But then there are these strange attempts at gut wrenching sappiness, which fall painfully flat amidst sub-video game animation. Frankly, I’m not even sure the CGI they use here is up to the task of displaying the kinds of emotions these people are trying to illicit from their characters. The humans more closely resemble totem poles than they do living, breathing, creatures. It’s laughable watching their polygon-limited faces trying to emote in response to the story’s attempts at heartfelt, soft touches.
Thankfully, the main characters are animals, which are at least bearably rendered to slapstick fun levels. As a result, what slapstick there is, is highly entertaining. Sure, Ray Romano’s vocal talents aren’t particularly spectacular. But Dennis Leary and the always-odd John Leguizamo cover for his mammoth ineptitude without hesitation.
The story itself is bland, boring, and uninspired, as is the almost laughably bad animation. The film’s only real saving graces are some slapstick side trips into the world of an unlucky squirrel and a group of soon-to-be-extinct melon-hoarding dodos. Ice Age’s comedy is worthy of Bugs, but unless you’re under 5, you’ll be bored with everything else.
看看行不行
《冒牌天神2》观后感:
This should've gone straight to video. Evan Almighty was not able to manage the expectations of those who came to see it anticipating as riotous a ride as its predecessor Bruce Almighty. It retained the premise of the original as a spin-off but it doesn't work not because Steve Carell is less talented than Jim Carrey but because he had lousy material to work with. Even Morgan Freeman (who reprises his role as God) lost the zing and impressive qualities he had in the first installment.
Evan Almighty apparently targets a family audience with its decidedly more religious overtones (check out what ARK really means), so it shouldn't have attempted to fool the audience by maintaining the Almighty franchise because it doesn't fit; its brand of humor and story simply failed to keep up.
It would've probably done better if it were marketed differently instead of lazily riding on the success of Bruce Almighty when it painfully couldn't deliver the same punches.
参考资料： 百度
已赞过
已踩过<
评论
收起
你对这个回答的评价是？
展开全部
有些事情似乎很难改变。比如说，当人类面临危机时，往往把自己的生命放在第一位考虑，在难以周全的情况下，总会牺牲其他动物的生命，即便它们刚刚救过自己的命。《南极大冒险》中，那8只忠心耿耿的雪橇犬就在南极科考队遭遇暴风雪紧急撤退时被暂时放弃了。当然，队员们当时的想法是，救人要紧！当时必须把在雪地考察中受伤的杰里和博士送回医疗条件足够的总部医院去，然后再驾直升机回基地接那8只雪橇犬——它们刚在考察中神勇地救过博士和杰里。
可是，飞机没有能再次回到基地。同样还是那个道理：有些事情很难改变。比如说，当人类决定是否去做一件事情时，会权衡利弊，而不会意气用事不顾一切。因为罕见的恶劣天气，南极科考队总部取消了一切任务，拒绝出动飞机冒险去救8只狗，理由很简单：救人还来不及呢！
与雪橇犬朝夕相处的主人杰里很难接受这个事实，他四处奔波，试图说服上级雪橇犬是科考队的成员，可还是无法改变什么。他还想到另辟蹊径，请求那位博士拨出部分科研款项帮助他再次回到南极，他以为博士会顾念雪橇犬的救命之恩，可他最后一丝希望也破灭了。博士告诉他科研款项不能浪费在不切实际的事情上，还劝慰他接受现实。整个世界都跟杰里作对，他只能放弃了，把自己放逐到麻木的工作中去——人毕竟还是要面对现实。
可是那些可爱的雪橇犬的身影还是无法从心中抹去，杰里坐卧不安，陷入消沉。于是他去拜访了最早养育这些雪橇犬的老人，在那儿听到的一个故事改变了他。故事讲的是一个人带着他的4条爱犬进森林捕猎，不幸受到一只黑熊的袭击。当那人从昏迷中醒来时，发现有2只狗为了保护他而牺牲了，黑熊和另2只狗却不见踪影。那人恢复后开始四处寻找另外那2只狗，找了很久。有人劝他放弃，告诉他那已经没有什么意义了。可他仍然坚持，哪怕爱犬已经死去，他也要找到它们，因为唯有这样他才能求得内心的平静。听完这个故事后，杰里终于知道怎样才能使自己的内心真正获得平静。他决定立即返回南极，靠自己的力量！无论多么困难，这世上总有些东西值得他不顾一切地去做。
当杰里破除万难回到基地，与6只存活下来的雪橇犬重逢时，那个场面让我激动得热泪盈眶，几乎想要欢呼。要知道，那时雪橇犬在零下8度的暴风雪中已经独立生存了整整180天！180天，在沙漠般死寂的雪原，它们并肩战斗，从未失去对生的渴望，并且仍然相信主人会回来。让人庆幸的是，6条雪橇犬终于等到了那一刻；让人难受的是，有2位那样可爱的伙伴永远留在了那里。在死亡的威胁下，那些雪橇犬表现得那样勇敢那样坚强那样团结，难以用言语和文字表达，只有看过电影的人才有切身的感受，那就是：恨不得立刻插上翅膀去极地解救它们！
我一下就爱上了那8只可爱的雪橇犬，在两小时内为它们的命运而饱受折磨。我觉得人与动物之间的爱有时更为长久。等条件成熟时，我一定会养狗。
可做些修改
可是，飞机没有能再次回到基地。同样还是那个道理：有些事情很难改变。比如说，当人类决定是否去做一件事情时，会权衡利弊，而不会意气用事不顾一切。因为罕见的恶劣天气，南极科考队总部取消了一切任务，拒绝出动飞机冒险去救8只狗，理由很简单：救人还来不及呢！
与雪橇犬朝夕相处的主人杰里很难接受这个事实，他四处奔波，试图说服上级雪橇犬是科考队的成员，可还是无法改变什么。他还想到另辟蹊径，请求那位博士拨出部分科研款项帮助他再次回到南极，他以为博士会顾念雪橇犬的救命之恩，可他最后一丝希望也破灭了。博士告诉他科研款项不能浪费在不切实际的事情上，还劝慰他接受现实。整个世界都跟杰里作对，他只能放弃了，把自己放逐到麻木的工作中去——人毕竟还是要面对现实。
可是那些可爱的雪橇犬的身影还是无法从心中抹去，杰里坐卧不安，陷入消沉。于是他去拜访了最早养育这些雪橇犬的老人，在那儿听到的一个故事改变了他。故事讲的是一个人带着他的4条爱犬进森林捕猎，不幸受到一只黑熊的袭击。当那人从昏迷中醒来时，发现有2只狗为了保护他而牺牲了，黑熊和另2只狗却不见踪影。那人恢复后开始四处寻找另外那2只狗，找了很久。有人劝他放弃，告诉他那已经没有什么意义了。可他仍然坚持，哪怕爱犬已经死去，他也要找到它们，因为唯有这样他才能求得内心的平静。听完这个故事后，杰里终于知道怎样才能使自己的内心真正获得平静。他决定立即返回南极，靠自己的力量！无论多么困难，这世上总有些东西值得他不顾一切地去做。
当杰里破除万难回到基地，与6只存活下来的雪橇犬重逢时，那个场面让我激动得热泪盈眶，几乎想要欢呼。要知道，那时雪橇犬在零下8度的暴风雪中已经独立生存了整整180天！180天，在沙漠般死寂的雪原，它们并肩战斗，从未失去对生的渴望，并且仍然相信主人会回来。让人庆幸的是，6条雪橇犬终于等到了那一刻；让人难受的是，有2位那样可爱的伙伴永远留在了那里。在死亡的威胁下，那些雪橇犬表现得那样勇敢那样坚强那样团结，难以用言语和文字表达，只有看过电影的人才有切身的感受，那就是：恨不得立刻插上翅膀去极地解救它们！
我一下就爱上了那8只可爱的雪橇犬，在两小时内为它们的命运而饱受折磨。我觉得人与动物之间的爱有时更为长久。等条件成熟时，我一定会养狗。
可做些修改
已赞过
已踩过<
评论
收起
你对这个回答的评价是？
展开全部
已赞过
已踩过<
评论
收起
你对这个回答的评价是？
更多回答（1）
推荐律师服务：
若未解决您的问题，请您详细描述您的问题，通过百度律临进行免费专业咨询
