Question

请帮我翻译一段英文

<p>Finally, any free program is threatened constantly by software
patents. We wish to avoid the danger that companies distributing free
software will individually obtain patent licenses, thus in effect
transforming the program into proprietary software. To prevent this,
we have made it clear that any patent must be licensed for everyone's
free use or not licensed at all.</p>
<p>Most GNU software, including some libraries, is covered by the
ordinary GNU General Public License, which was designed for utility
programs. This license, the GNU Library General Public License,
applies to certain designated libraries. This license is quite
different from the ordinary one; be sure to read it in full, and don't
assume that anything in it is the same as in the ordinary license.</p>
<p>The reason we have a separate public license for some libraries
is that they blur the distinction we usually make between modifying or
adding to a program and simply using it. Linking a program with a
library, without changing the library, is in some sense simply using
the library, and is analogous to running a utility program or
application program. However, in a textual and legal sense, the linked
executable is a combined work, a derivative of the original library,
and the ordinary General Public License treats it as such.</p>
<p>Because of this blurred distinction, using the ordinary General
Public License for libraries did not effectively promote software
sharing, because most developers did not use the libraries. We
concluded that weaker conditions might promote sharing better.</p>
<p>However, unrestricted linking of non-free programs would deprive
the users of those programs of all benefit from the free status of the
libraries themselves. This Library General Public License is intended
to permit developers of non-free programs to use free libraries, while
preserving your freedom as a user of such programs to change the free
libraries that are incorporated in them. (We have not seen how to
achieve this as regards changes in header files, but we have achieved
it as regards changes in the actual functions of the Library.) The
hope is that this will lead to faster development of free libraries.</p>
<p>The precise terms and conditions for copying, distribution and
modification follow. Pay close attention to the difference between a
``work based on the library'' and a ``work that uses the library''.
The former contains code derived from the library, while the latter
only works together with the library.</p>
<p>Note that it is possible for a library to be covered by the
ordinary General Public License rather than by this special one.</p>
<h2>Terms and Conditions for Copying, Distribution and Modification</h2>

Answer 1

<p>最后，任何自由软件不断受到软件的威胁
专利。我们希望避免这样的风险，公司免费派发
软件以个人名义获得专利许可证，从而影响
转变为私有软件程序。为了避免这种情况，
我们已经说得很清楚，任何专利必须以允许每个人的
免费使用或不许可的。“/页”
<p>大多数GNU软件，包括一些图书馆，范围涵盖
普通的GNU通用公共许可证，这是实用设计
程序。该许可证，GNU库通用公共许可证，
适用于某些指定的图书馆。该许可证是相当
有别于一般之一，一定要完全读它，不
假设你相信它是在普通许可相同。“/页”
<p>我们之所以有一些独立的图书馆公共许可证
是他们模糊的区别，我们通常之间作出修改或
增加了一个程序，只是使用它。联系起来的程序
库库不改变，只不过是用在某种意义上
图书馆，和类似于运行实用程序或
应用程序。然而，在文字和法律意识，联系
可执行文件是一个综合的工作，原始图书馆衍生物，
和一般通用公共许可证将其视为这样。“/页”
由于这种<p>模糊的界线，使用普通的一般
公共图书馆许可证没有有效地促进软件
分享，因为大多数开发人员没有使用图书馆。我们
结论是，较弱的条件下可能会促进更好的交流。“/页”
<p>但是，无限制的连接的非免费计划将剥夺
所有从地位受惠程序的用户
图书馆本身。该图书馆通用公共许可证的目的
允许非开发人员使用的免费程序，免费图书馆，而
维护由于这种程序来改变你的自由免费用户
库被纳入其中。 （我们还没有看到如何
做到这一点，就在头文件中的变化，但我们已经取得
它关于在图书馆的实际功能的变化。）的
希望这将导致更快的免费图书馆的发展。“/页”
<p>的明确条款及条件复制，发布和
修改遵循。密切关注之间的区别
``工作的基础上图书馆''和``工作使用该库''。
前者包含从图书馆获得的代码，而后者则
只能与图书馆。“/页”
<p>请注意，有可能图书馆由包括
一般通用公共许可证，而不是这个特殊的一年。“/页”
<h2>条款及复制，发布和修改“/氢气条件”

Answer 2

估计楼主没有经验吧 这个东西没有100分不能搞定的

Answer 3

大哥 这不叫一段英文 这叫一篇英文。。。