2009-10-05
展开全部
用future有点中国式的Chinglish
最好改为 yesterday,today and tomorrow
Harvey Schachter is a freelance journalist, lecturer on the media, and former editor of The Kingston Whig-Standard. Some of the research for this paper was conducted while he was a Skelton-Clark fellow at Queen's University for the 1995-96 academic year.
Conrad Black and his Nepoleonic zeal drew attention to newspapers with his purchase last year of Southam Inc. and a swath of Thomson newspapers. But the clamour he provoked may have diverted us from the real difficulties faced by Canadian newspapers. Anyone concerned about public policy should be concerned about newspapers. But they should be looking beyond Black to more fundamental changes in the industry--changes that offer both peril and promise for the future.
Michael Crichton, who attracts more readers than all of Black's newspapers put together, appeared a few years ago before the Washington Press Gallery to talk about the American media. He opened by noting that he was an expert on dinosaurs, having written a trilogy on the subject--his novels on Jurassic Park, Japanese-U.S. trade relations, and sexual harassment. (1)
"But I would like to discuss another dinosaur, one that may be on the road to extinction. I am referring to the American media. And I use the term extinction literally. To my mind, it is likely that what we now understand as the mass media will be gone within ten years. Vanished, without a trace."
It's easy to dismiss his statement as heperbole. But Crichton has succeeded by divining the sensitive issues we face and capitalizing on them with gripping novels. And by zeroing in on the American media--walking into the den of the establishment and telling the Washington Press Gallery that The New York Times, CBS and the lot might soon be extinct--he has again found a sensitive spot.
Extinction is unlikely for the entire media, of course, but it's at least possible for most newspapers and quite likely for many. And the rest of the media will be subject to massive change in the years ahead, as people flock to new information technologies and delivery systems yet to be built.
You can't predict the future by extrapolating from the past, but, before looking at that future, it might be helpful to scrutinize the changes that have hammered newspapers. (2) Newspapers have traditionally been the medium for daily, intelligent discussion and dissemination of public issues and news. If they degenerate or disappear, public policy could suffer.
最好用谷-哥 搜索下 会有很多发现的
最好改为 yesterday,today and tomorrow
Harvey Schachter is a freelance journalist, lecturer on the media, and former editor of The Kingston Whig-Standard. Some of the research for this paper was conducted while he was a Skelton-Clark fellow at Queen's University for the 1995-96 academic year.
Conrad Black and his Nepoleonic zeal drew attention to newspapers with his purchase last year of Southam Inc. and a swath of Thomson newspapers. But the clamour he provoked may have diverted us from the real difficulties faced by Canadian newspapers. Anyone concerned about public policy should be concerned about newspapers. But they should be looking beyond Black to more fundamental changes in the industry--changes that offer both peril and promise for the future.
Michael Crichton, who attracts more readers than all of Black's newspapers put together, appeared a few years ago before the Washington Press Gallery to talk about the American media. He opened by noting that he was an expert on dinosaurs, having written a trilogy on the subject--his novels on Jurassic Park, Japanese-U.S. trade relations, and sexual harassment. (1)
"But I would like to discuss another dinosaur, one that may be on the road to extinction. I am referring to the American media. And I use the term extinction literally. To my mind, it is likely that what we now understand as the mass media will be gone within ten years. Vanished, without a trace."
It's easy to dismiss his statement as heperbole. But Crichton has succeeded by divining the sensitive issues we face and capitalizing on them with gripping novels. And by zeroing in on the American media--walking into the den of the establishment and telling the Washington Press Gallery that The New York Times, CBS and the lot might soon be extinct--he has again found a sensitive spot.
Extinction is unlikely for the entire media, of course, but it's at least possible for most newspapers and quite likely for many. And the rest of the media will be subject to massive change in the years ahead, as people flock to new information technologies and delivery systems yet to be built.
You can't predict the future by extrapolating from the past, but, before looking at that future, it might be helpful to scrutinize the changes that have hammered newspapers. (2) Newspapers have traditionally been the medium for daily, intelligent discussion and dissemination of public issues and news. If they degenerate or disappear, public policy could suffer.
最好用谷-哥 搜索下 会有很多发现的
展开全部
直接抄别人写的对提高自己英语写作水平没帮助,只是应付作业罢了。
请参考赵本山小品《昨天 今天 明天》台词,重新组织一下再自己尝试着翻译,至少提高了自己的汉译英翻译水平。
开篇语:
本山大叔的小品一向风趣幽默,对社会现实也有一定深度的反映,深得我喜爱。看到此标题,我忍不住重温其作品《昨天 今天 明天》......
烦劳楼主翻译了。
这样老师一看就知道,你是下了功夫的,绝对不是抄的。
请参考赵本山小品《昨天 今天 明天》台词,重新组织一下再自己尝试着翻译,至少提高了自己的汉译英翻译水平。
开篇语:
本山大叔的小品一向风趣幽默,对社会现实也有一定深度的反映,深得我喜爱。看到此标题,我忍不住重温其作品《昨天 今天 明天》......
烦劳楼主翻译了。
这样老师一看就知道,你是下了功夫的,绝对不是抄的。
参考资料: http://zhidao.baidu.com/question/605254.html
已赞过
已踩过<
评论
收起
你对这个回答的评价是?
推荐律师服务:
若未解决您的问题,请您详细描述您的问题,通过百度律临进行免费专业咨询