Question

非常急！！ 谁能帮我翻译这两段？！！不胜感激~在线等！！！

热电的方面的，谁专业点？帮我翻译一下 谢谢~~
1) Environmental:
NG fired plants is environmentally friendly - produces green energy (with NOx emission 25 ppm only). Emission of CO2 are well below that of coal fired plants.
Coal fired plants, is the opposite: Burning coal produces more carbon dioxide than burning NG, which contributes to greenhouse effect warming the Earth.
Coal-fired plants need huge amounts of fuel, which means ship-loads/train-loads of coal almost constantly. In order to cope with changing demands for power, the station needs reserves. This means covering a large area of the industrial park next to the power station with piles of coal, which destroys plants and ruins landscapes. Logistics will also be more difficult/complicated, when compared to NG – where it can simply be piped to the plant.
3) Cost of steam and power:
Cost of natural gas is more expensive than coal. However, considering the environmental pressure on China to reduce carbon emission going forward, and in line with China policy to reduce energy consumptions, it will be prudent for the park authorities to consider the more environmental friendly, highly efficient and energy saving NG fired cogen plant.

Answer 1

杜绝机译，请放心采用。
1) Environmental:
NG fired plants is environmentally friendly - produces green energy (with NOx emission 25 ppm only). Emission of CO2 are well below that of coal fired plants.
1)环境的：
天然气燃气电厂是环境友好的——产生绿色能源（NOx的排放量只有25ppm）。二氧化碳排放量大大低于燃煤电厂的二氧化碳排放量。
Coal fired plants, is the opposite: Burning coal produces more carbon dioxide than burning NG, which contributes to greenhouse effect warming the Earth.
燃煤电厂则相反：燃烧中的煤比燃烧中的天然气产生更多的二氧化碳，这对地球变暖的温室效应造成了贡献。
Coal-fired plants need huge amounts of fuel, which means ship-loads/train-loads of coal almost constantly. In order to cope with changing demands for power, the station needs reserves.燃煤电厂需要大量的燃料，这意味着几乎不断的煤的船运或列车载运。为了应付电力需求的变化，发电厂就需要煤的储存。 This means covering a large area of the industrial park next to the power station with piles of coal, which destroys plants and ruins landscapes. 这意味着在靠近电厂的工业园要涵盖很大的面积堆积一堆堆的煤，这破坏了植被和毁坏的景观。Logistics will also be more difficult/complicated, when compared to NG – where it can simply be piped to the plant.
与天然气相比，后勤保障也变得更加困难而复杂，天然气只要简单地用管道通到电厂即可。
3) Cost of steam and power:
3）蒸汽和电力的成本：
Cost of natural gas is more expensive than coal. 天然气的成本比煤要贵。However, considering the environmental pressure on China to reduce carbon emission going forward, and in line with China policy to reduce energy consumptions, it will be prudent for the park authorities to consider the more environmental friendly, highly efficient and energy saving NG fired cogen plant. 可是考虑到中国减少碳排放正在前进的压力，以及与中国降低能耗的政策相一致，对于工业园的管理当局来说，考虑更加环境友好的、高效而节能的天然气燃气电厂当然是明智的。

Answer 2

1）环境：
吴电厂是环保-生产绿色能源（与氮氧化物排放量25百万只）。二氧化碳的排放量远低于煤炭发电厂。
燃煤发电厂，是相反：燃烧煤炭生产超过燃烧议员，这有助于温室效应使地球变暖的二氧化碳。
燃煤发电厂需要大量燃料，这意味着煤炭ship-loads/train-loads几乎不断。为了应付不断变化的电力需求，需要储备站。这意味着覆盖了工业园区与旁边的煤炭桩，这既破坏了遗址的景观植物和大面积电站。物流也将更加困难/复杂，相对于吴-地方可以简单地通过管道输送到工厂。
3）成本的蒸汽和权力：
天然气的成本是比煤炭更昂贵。但是，考虑到关于中国的环境压力，以减少二氧化碳排放量前进，并与中国的政策，以减少能源消耗，这将是审慎的公园当局应考虑更环保，高效节能燃煤热电工厂吴。

Answer 3

NG电厂是环保-生产绿色能源（氮氧化物排放量只有25ppm）。二氧化碳的排放量远低于煤炭发电厂。
燃煤发电厂，则正相反：燃烧煤比燃烧NG产生了更多的二氧化碳，这有助于温室效应使地球变暖的二氧化碳。这种温室效应使地球变暖。
燃煤发电厂需要大量燃料，这意味着煤炭船运的载重与/火车的载重几乎不断。为了应付不断变化的电力需求，需要储备站。这意味着要覆盖工业园区与旁边用煤的电站，这种情况既破化了植物又毁坏了景观。物流因此也将变得更困难和复杂，相比之下NG可以简单地通过管道输送到工厂。

这不是一段很难翻译的文章，可惜我不够专业，有些词汇你可以再参考其他人的翻译。 如果有简单的问题，可以E-mail我的邮箱。519144611@qq.com

Answer 4

1）环境：
吴电厂是环保-生产绿色能源（与氮氧化物排放量25百万只）。二氧化碳的排放量远低于煤炭发电厂。
燃煤发电厂，是相反：燃烧煤炭生产超过燃烧议员，这有助于温室效应使地球变暖的二氧化碳。
燃煤发电厂需要大量燃料，这意味着煤炭ship-loads/train-loads（这句请检查一下是不是打错了！）几乎不断。为了应付不断变化的电力需求，需要储备站。这意味着覆盖了工业园区与旁边的煤炭桩，这既破坏了遗址的景观植物和大面积电站。物流也将更加困难/复杂，
相比吴-地方可以简单地通过管道输送到工厂。
3）蒸汽成本和权力：
天然气的成本是比煤炭更昂贵。但是，考虑到关于中国的环境压力，以减少二氧化碳排放量前进，并与中国的政策，以减少能源消耗，这将是审慎的公园当局应考虑更环保，高效节能燃煤热电工厂吴