请英语高手 求救 20
ThecollapseoftheplannedDeutsche-DresdnerBankmergertarnishedthereputationofbothparties...
The collapse of the planned Deutsche-Dresdner Bank merger tarnished the reputation of both parties DeutscheBank’s management was exposed as divided and confused.But even if the takeover has gone ahead,it would probably still have claimed its victims.Most completed takeovers damage one party-the company making the acquisition.
A long list of studies have all reached the same conclusion;the majority of takeovers damage the interests of the shareholders of the acquired company, who receive more for their shares than they were worth before the takeover was announced.
Why do so many mergers and acquisitions fail account of the different culture of the companies involved.
Melding corporate culture takes times, which senior management dose not have after a merger. Most merger are bosed on the idea of “let’s increase revenues”, but you have to have a functioning management team to manage that process. The nature of the problem is not so much that there’s open welfare between the sides. It’s that the cultures don’t meld quickly enough to take advantage of the opportunities.
Many consultants refer to how little time companies spend before a merger thinking about whether their organisations are compatible .The benefits of mergers are usually couched in financial or.
Mergers are about compatibility, which means agreeing whose values will prevail and who will be the dominant partner. Merger compaines are said to ‘tie the knot’. When mergers are called off, the two companies fail to ‘make it up the aisle’or their relationship remains ‘unconsummated’.Yet the metaphor fails to convey the scale of risk companies run when they launch acquisitions or mergers.Even in countries with high divorce rates,marriages have a better success rate than mergers.
How can acquires try to ensure they are successful in the acquisition?There are two conditions for success.
The first is to define what success means. The combined entities have to deliver better returns to the shareholders than they would of doing things will prevail mergers of equals can be so dangerous because it is not clear who is in change. Managers need to ask what advantages they will bring to the acquired company that competitors will find difficult to replicate.
Managers need to remember that competitors are not going to have around waitting for them to improve the performance of their new acquisition. Announcing a takeover will have alerted competitors to the acquiring company’s strategy. Given how heavily the odds are stacked against successful mergers, managers should consider whether their time and the shareholders’ money would not be better employed elsewhere.
Summary: 企业并购
1. How fail(The bank)
2. Studies daim the same conclusion
3. Reason (Why mergers and acquisitions fail)
4. Ways to ensure a auccessful acquisition
5. Conclusion.
将原文缩写成下面5个问题
各位英语高手 求救
回答问题 展开
A long list of studies have all reached the same conclusion;the majority of takeovers damage the interests of the shareholders of the acquired company, who receive more for their shares than they were worth before the takeover was announced.
Why do so many mergers and acquisitions fail account of the different culture of the companies involved.
Melding corporate culture takes times, which senior management dose not have after a merger. Most merger are bosed on the idea of “let’s increase revenues”, but you have to have a functioning management team to manage that process. The nature of the problem is not so much that there’s open welfare between the sides. It’s that the cultures don’t meld quickly enough to take advantage of the opportunities.
Many consultants refer to how little time companies spend before a merger thinking about whether their organisations are compatible .The benefits of mergers are usually couched in financial or.
Mergers are about compatibility, which means agreeing whose values will prevail and who will be the dominant partner. Merger compaines are said to ‘tie the knot’. When mergers are called off, the two companies fail to ‘make it up the aisle’or their relationship remains ‘unconsummated’.Yet the metaphor fails to convey the scale of risk companies run when they launch acquisitions or mergers.Even in countries with high divorce rates,marriages have a better success rate than mergers.
How can acquires try to ensure they are successful in the acquisition?There are two conditions for success.
The first is to define what success means. The combined entities have to deliver better returns to the shareholders than they would of doing things will prevail mergers of equals can be so dangerous because it is not clear who is in change. Managers need to ask what advantages they will bring to the acquired company that competitors will find difficult to replicate.
Managers need to remember that competitors are not going to have around waitting for them to improve the performance of their new acquisition. Announcing a takeover will have alerted competitors to the acquiring company’s strategy. Given how heavily the odds are stacked against successful mergers, managers should consider whether their time and the shareholders’ money would not be better employed elsewhere.
Summary: 企业并购
1. How fail(The bank)
2. Studies daim the same conclusion
3. Reason (Why mergers and acquisitions fail)
4. Ways to ensure a auccessful acquisition
5. Conclusion.
将原文缩写成下面5个问题
各位英语高手 求救
回答问题 展开
推荐律师服务：
若未解决您的问题，请您详细描述您的问题，通过百度律临进行免费专业咨询
