请教一个英语小问题?
请问这里为什么用副词apparently ,而不是形容词apparent,谢谢 。 展开
这句话的结构是一个主系表的句子结构。主语是their entry,系动词was,表语则是apparently后面的部分,从not一直到job这里。所以,这个句子中便不能在系动词was之后再使用形容词了,如果这里不是apparently而是apparent的话,,那么apparent放在was的后面,那它就是句子的表语,这时就出现了语法错误,一个系动词后面不可能跟着两个表语成分,而且这里使用形容词的话句子的语义也就不通了。使用副词,这时候副词可以修饰整个句子,使整个句子的语义更加完整。
咱们先来看apparent,然后再看apparently.
1 [more apparent; most apparent] : easy to see or understand
The other team's superiority was apparent [=evident] in the first half of the game.
The truth is apparent to me. [=I can clearly see the truth]
Her reasons for leaving were readily apparent. [=were obvious or easy to see]
2 always used before a noun : seeming to be true but possibly not true
We disagreed on the apparent meaning of the movie.
He died of an apparent heart attack. [=it appears that a heart attack caused his death]
What was the apparent cause of the accident?
看到了吧,apparent的意思,一个是显而易见的意思,咱们可以说一个事情或者东西是显而易见的。再不就是入在名词前头,表示看起来是正确的但是可能是不正确的。这句话如果写成:Their entry into his flat was apparent,是可以的,就是很明显有人进过他的公寓。但是后边再接的成分,咱们就没法解释了。
咱们再来看apparently。
— used to describe something that appears to be true based on what is known
The window had apparently been forced open.
We were surprised when their apparently [=seemingly, ostensibly] happy marriage ended after only two years.
Apparently, he died of a heart attack. = He died of a heart attack, apparently. = He apparently died of a heart attack. [=it appears that a heart attack caused his death]
这个副词表达的是基于某个事实(大家都知道的事情),然后看起来是正确的。
这样这个句子就好解释了:小偷进入他的公寓,然后有些迹象表明这不是第一次,整个过程是显而易见的,这个时候就需要用apparently.
再从句子结构中分析一下:Their entry into his flat was not the burglars' first job. 这个句子是一个完整的结构,如果你用了apparent,那这个句子结构就不对了,apparent与not the burglars' first job发生了冲突。这个时候用apparently就正好了。
这里的副词: apparently 是修饰系动词 was 而不是做表语。
只有做表语时用形容词。