Question

求助，求英语高手帮忙翻译，急用，谢谢

毕业论文需要，求英语高手帮忙翻译一下下面的话：
：我国刑法上并没有关于假象防卫的立法，理论界对于假象防卫也是众说纷纭，除了在概念，特征上有比较同意的说法以外，对于假象防卫的范围、罪过形式以及是否确立假象防卫过当问题上都存在着很大的分歧和争论。这给我国的司法审判工作也造成了极大的的不便。本文在分析这些分歧和争论时，简要的论述一下自己的一些观点。

Answer 1

There is no illusion of defense legislation according to China's criminal law. There are also different views for the illusion of defense in theoretical circles. Besides the concept and features people agree on a statement, there are still great difference and controversies outside the scope of defense for the illusion, sin, and whether the form of over-defense issues, which caused great inconvenience. Based on the analysis of these differences and disputes, a brief discussion about some of their own point of view are to be given.

Answer 2

Thesis necessary, seek expert help in English translation of what the following words:
: China's criminal law, and no illusion of defense legislation, theoretical circles were also different views for the illusion of defense, in addition to the concept, features a relatively agreed on a statement outside the scope of defense for the illusion, sin, and whether to establish the form of over-defense issue of false There are great differences and controversies. This gives China's judicial work caused great inconvenience. Based on the analysis of these differences and disputes, a brief discussion about some of their own point of view.

Answer 3

China's criminal law and no illusions about defense legislation, theoretical retricted to defend is false, except in the concept, characteristics of comparative agree on defense for false, the form of sin, and the scope of undue defence establishment whether false issues exist significant differences and debate. This gave our judicial work also caused a great inconvenience. Based on the analysis of these differences and disagreements, briefly discusses some of yourself.

能帮得到忙吗?

Answer 4

China's criminal law, and no illusion of defense legislation, theoretical circles were also different views for the illusion of defense, in addition to the concept, features a relatively agreed on a statement outside the scope of defense for the illusion, sin, and whether the form of over-defense issues, they have to establish a false impression there are significant differences and controversies. This gives China's judicial work caused great inconvenience. Based on the analysis of these differences and disputes, a brief discussion about some of their own point of view.