英语学习 奥巴马演讲?
therewillnodoubtbethoseforwhommystatementsofcondemnationarenotenough应该怎么划分句子成分,,谓语是哪个...
there will no doubt be those for whom my statements of condemnation are not enough 应该怎么划分句子成分,,谓语是哪个,怎么理解这句话
展开
1个回答
展开全部
您好,There will no doubt be those for whom my statements of condemnation are not enough. 个人认为是一个 there be 句型,夹带了一个定语从句。
no doubt = doubtless,做修饰用(毫无疑问地)
句子可以压缩到最基本的句型:
There will be those.【会有那些。】
There will no doubt be those.【毫无疑问,会有那些。】
定语从句是由(介宾)结构的 for whom 引导,引导词 whom 在定语从句中充当宾语,替代先行词 those。句子改写会比较清楚:
my statements of condemnation are not enough for those.
(我的谴责声明对于那些人来说是不够的。)
介词 for 调到了从句句首,构成(介词+which)的结构,也就是
for those my statements of condemnation are not enough.
(对于那些人来说,我的谴责声明是不够的。)
所以:
There will no doubt be those for whom my statements of condemnation are not enough.
(毫无疑问,对那些人来说,我的谴责声明是不够的。)
no doubt = doubtless,做修饰用(毫无疑问地)
句子可以压缩到最基本的句型:
There will be those.【会有那些。】
There will no doubt be those.【毫无疑问,会有那些。】
定语从句是由(介宾)结构的 for whom 引导,引导词 whom 在定语从句中充当宾语,替代先行词 those。句子改写会比较清楚:
my statements of condemnation are not enough for those.
(我的谴责声明对于那些人来说是不够的。)
介词 for 调到了从句句首,构成(介词+which)的结构,也就是
for those my statements of condemnation are not enough.
(对于那些人来说,我的谴责声明是不够的。)
所以:
There will no doubt be those for whom my statements of condemnation are not enough.
(毫无疑问,对那些人来说,我的谴责声明是不够的。)
已赞过
已踩过<
评论
收起
你对这个回答的评价是?
推荐律师服务:
若未解决您的问题,请您详细描述您的问题,通过百度律临进行免费专业咨询