法律英语，有点难．高手帮帮忙啊！
法律英语，有点难．高手帮帮忙翻译下啊Inmostactionsfordamages,thepartieshavearighttohavethefactstriedbyaj...
法律英语，有点难．高手帮帮忙翻译下啊
In most actions for damages,the parties have a right to have the facts tried by a jury.This right is assured in the federal courts by the Seventh Amendmentto the Constitution,and is protected in the courts of most states by similar constitutional provisions. If there is a right to trial by jury,either partymay asserts it,but if neither wishes to do so ,a judge will try the facts as well as the law.Largely for historical reasons growing out of a division of authority in the English court structure,there are many civil actions in which neither party has a right to a jury trial: these include most cases in which plaintiff wants an order directing or prohibiting specified action by defendant rather than a judgment for damages----a so-called equitable remedy.
If a jury has been demanded,the first order of business at trial will be to impanel the jury.A large number of people.selected in an impartial manner from various lists,tax rolls,or street directories,will have been ordered to report to the courthouse for jury at a given term of court.The prospective jurors will be questioned---usually by the judge but sometimes by the lawyers as to their possible biases.If one of the parties,he or she probably will be successfully challenged for cause and excused.But suppose Aikins is an architect and her lawyer finds that one of the jury panel has recently constructed a house and believes that he was greatly overcharged for its design and construction;this will likely not be enough to persuade the judge to excuse him,but fearing the juror maybe prejudiced against her client,Aikins lawyer will probably exercise one of the small number of peremptoty challenges allowed for which no reason need be given.Ultimately,a panel of between six and twelve hopefully unbiased jurors will be selected. 展开
In most actions for damages,the parties have a right to have the facts tried by a jury.This right is assured in the federal courts by the Seventh Amendmentto the Constitution,and is protected in the courts of most states by similar constitutional provisions. If there is a right to trial by jury,either partymay asserts it,but if neither wishes to do so ,a judge will try the facts as well as the law.Largely for historical reasons growing out of a division of authority in the English court structure,there are many civil actions in which neither party has a right to a jury trial: these include most cases in which plaintiff wants an order directing or prohibiting specified action by defendant rather than a judgment for damages----a so-called equitable remedy.
If a jury has been demanded,the first order of business at trial will be to impanel the jury.A large number of people.selected in an impartial manner from various lists,tax rolls,or street directories,will have been ordered to report to the courthouse for jury at a given term of court.The prospective jurors will be questioned---usually by the judge but sometimes by the lawyers as to their possible biases.If one of the parties,he or she probably will be successfully challenged for cause and excused.But suppose Aikins is an architect and her lawyer finds that one of the jury panel has recently constructed a house and believes that he was greatly overcharged for its design and construction;this will likely not be enough to persuade the judge to excuse him,but fearing the juror maybe prejudiced against her client,Aikins lawyer will probably exercise one of the small number of peremptoty challenges allowed for which no reason need be given.Ultimately,a panel of between six and twelve hopefully unbiased jurors will be selected. 展开
3个回答
展开全部
在多数损害诉讼，党有权利安排事实由陪审员尝试。这权利在联邦法庭在多数状态法院保证由第七Amendmentto宪法和被保护由相似的宪法供应。 如果有权利到试验由陪审员， partymay的二者之一断言它，但，如果两个愿望对不如此，法官将尝试事实并且法律。主要为生长出于当局分裂的历史原因在英国法院结构，有两个党没有权利到陪审团审讯的许多民事诉讼： 这些包括原告想要命令指挥或禁止指定的行动的由被告而不是评断为损伤的多数案件----所谓的公平的补救。
如果陪审员被要求了，事务第一等级在试验将是列于陪审名单陪审员。很大数量的people.selected以公平的方式从各种各样的名单、税务名单或者街道目录，将被定购向法院大楼报告为陪审员在法院的一个特定期限。未来的陪审员将被问---通常由法官，但有时由律师至于他们可能的偏心。如果其中一个党，他或她为起因将成功地大概被质询并且辨解。但假设Aikins是建筑师，并且她的律师发现一个陪审团盘区最近修建了房子并且相信他为它的设计和建筑很大地被索价过高; 这可能不会是说服法官的足够辨解他，但是恐惧对她的客户可能存偏见的陪审员， Aikins律师大概将行使允许的很小数量的peremptoty挑战之一原因不需要被给。最后，在六个和十二个有希望地公正的陪审员之间盘区将被选择。
如果陪审员被要求了，事务第一等级在试验将是列于陪审名单陪审员。很大数量的people.selected以公平的方式从各种各样的名单、税务名单或者街道目录，将被定购向法院大楼报告为陪审员在法院的一个特定期限。未来的陪审员将被问---通常由法官，但有时由律师至于他们可能的偏心。如果其中一个党，他或她为起因将成功地大概被质询并且辨解。但假设Aikins是建筑师，并且她的律师发现一个陪审团盘区最近修建了房子并且相信他为它的设计和建筑很大地被索价过高; 这可能不会是说服法官的足够辨解他，但是恐惧对她的客户可能存偏见的陪审员， Aikins律师大概将行使允许的很小数量的peremptoty挑战之一原因不需要被给。最后，在六个和十二个有希望地公正的陪审员之间盘区将被选择。
本回答由提问者推荐
已赞过
已踩过<
评论
收起
你对这个回答的评价是？
推荐律师服务：
若未解决您的问题，请您详细描述您的问题，通过百度律临进行免费专业咨询
