Question

各位高手帮帮忙翻译，十万火急！谢谢！！

If China enters the Pacific Trade system with a trade structure that defines that
system, as it is already doing, that system will not be able to accommodate China very
long without major structural rehabilitation of the kind that flattens eager, but unwary,
home buyers. The problem is not just the size, but the form-the architecture, if you
will-of that trade system. The Pacific trade system is a structured system of investment,
specialization and trade that links the different Asian economies with one
another and with the rest of the world, especially the United States and Japan who
together play the defining roles in that system. It can best be understood as a complex
production organization-more a factory than a fortress (as some have argued), or an
international Ricardian system tending towards equilibrium (as most economists
posit), that is, a self-regulating, and self-directing system of shy governments and
contestable markets. It is a factory that is heavily dependent on a huge net positive
trade balance with the U.S. and Europe (mostly the U.S.), in good part because of a
persistent unwillingness, or inability, by Japan to radicaEly increase imports of manufactured
goods to offset its exports.

Answer 1

如果中国进入有着系统贸易结构的太平洋贸易体系，

虽它已经在进行，该系统将无法适应中国非常

长期没有发生重大的结构性的那种渴望恢复平展，但粗心的，

置业人士。这个问题不仅是大小，而且是建筑的外形，如果你

意志的贸易制度。太平洋贸易体系是投资结构体系，

专业化和贸易联系起来不同的亚洲经济体之一

另外，与世界其他地区，尤其是美国和日本谁

在该制度一起发挥的决定性作用。它最能理解为一个复杂的

生产组织，更是一个比一个堡垒工厂（如一些人所认为的那样），或1

李嘉图对国际体系趋于平衡（正如大多数经济学家

断定），即是一种自我调节，自我指导和害羞政府系统

可竞争市场。这是一家工厂，在很大程度上依赖于一个巨大的净正

贸易平衡与美国和欧洲（主要是美国），因为在一个良好的一部分

坚持不愿或不能由日本，radicaEly增加进口制造

货物，以抵消其出口。