请哪位英语高手帮我翻译一篇医学论文摘要

【摘要】目的:观察使用中心静脉导管作闭式引流术与传统硅胶管作胸腔闭式引流术治疗矽肺并发自发性气胸的疗效和并发症。方法:对2007年1月至2009年12月收治于我科18例矽... 【摘要】 目的:观察使用中心静脉导管作闭式引流术与传统硅胶管作胸腔闭式引流术治疗矽肺并发自发性气胸的疗效和并发症。方法: 对2007年1月至2009年12月收治于我科18例矽肺并发自发性气胸患者使用中心静脉导管作闭式引流术,观察疗效及并发症,并与之前传统常规硅胶管作胸腔闭式引流术比较。结果: 两种方法在疗效方面比较无明显统计学差异(P>0.05)。但在某些并发症上,中心静脉导管组较传统硅胶管组明显减少,统计学上具有显著性差异(P<0.05)。结论:使用中心静脉导管作闭式引流术治疗矽肺并自发性气胸疗效等同于传统硅胶管作胸腔闭式引流术,并且具有操作方法简便、并发症少等优点。 展开
 我来答
颜雪棠樱
2010-07-28 · TA获得超过1178个赞
知道答主
回答量:46
采纳率:0%
帮助的人:36.7万
展开全部
"The observation center for the purpose of using : conduit for expression to close and turned silicon 胶管 traditional for his style to the treatment of spontaneous art 矽肺 concurrent with the effect of his chest and complications. method : in january, 2007 and 2009 fire in my family on december 18 矽肺 concurrent spontaneity with the use of the centre was closed to make a tube, observe the curative effect and complications and traditional conventional silicon 胶管 before make his style to keep the art. results : two methods in effect in a.: The two methods in effect is no obvious difference in the statistics ( p. 0.05 ). but in some complications, the catheter into the center of a conventional silicon 胶管 group has dropped, statistics on a significant gender difference ( p < 0.05 ). conclusion : use the tube with the centre for your expression to the treatment of spontaneous art 矽肺 and with the effect to the traditional silicon 胶管 his style to a close, and an operation method is simple and less complications.

参考资料: 自己

已赞过 已踩过<
你对这个回答的评价是?
评论 收起
灵魂梦蝶
2010-07-28
知道答主
回答量:3
采纳率:0%
帮助的人:0
展开全部
Objective: To observe the use of central venous catheter to closed drainage with traditional silicone tube closed thoracic drainage for spontaneous pneumothorax in silicosis treatment efficacy and complications. Methods: from January 2007 to December 2009 were treated in our department 18 cases of silicosis and spontaneous pneumothorax in patients with central venous catheters in the closed drainage, therapeutic effect and complications with silicone tube as before with conventional closed chest Comparison of type drainage. Results: Comparison of two methods in efficacy was no significant difference (P> 0.05). However, some complications, the central venous catheter group than the traditional silicone tube significantly reduced, statistically significant difference (P <0.05). Conclusion: The use of central venous catheter to closed drainage treatment of silicosis and the effect of spontaneous pneumothorax the same as traditional silicone tube for closed thoracic drainage, and has the operation is simple, and fewer complications.
本回答被提问者采纳
已赞过 已踩过<
你对这个回答的评价是?
评论 收起
_黄雅淳
2010-07-28 · TA获得超过1962个赞
知道大有可为答主
回答量:1366
采纳率:0%
帮助的人:1110万
展开全部
可惜我用手机不然发那个翻译的网站给你,其实你直接到百度收中文翻译网站就可以了
已赞过 已踩过<
你对这个回答的评价是?
评论 收起
收起 更多回答(1)
推荐律师服务: 若未解决您的问题,请您详细描述您的问题,通过百度律临进行免费专业咨询

为你推荐:

下载百度知道APP,抢鲜体验
使用百度知道APP,立即抢鲜体验。你的手机镜头里或许有别人想知道的答案。
扫描二维码下载
×

类别

我们会通过消息、邮箱等方式尽快将举报结果通知您。

说明

0/200

提交
取消

辅 助

模 式