Question

高手帮忙

The same things maintain a constant size and color in spite of changing distance, perspective and lighting; different things are taken to be examples of a single type of object (a tree, house, etc)；learning skills also refers to typical instruments and situations; finally, the constancy of meaning mediates intersubjectively between different individual experiences and actions.
This constancy gives experience directives and contexts; it is the basis of the relative reliability of the things and the familiarity of the world. As long as this identity of meaning is maintained, experience moves within a fixed framework which only allows for further determinations. What we are confronted with here is an openness within specific rule structures. The following considerations show that this constancy is not absolute.
(d) Potential change of meaning. The same thing can also appear as something different. The given meaning does not exhaust the possible significations of reality; every fulfillment of our intentions is confronted with a superabundance of the given, with an excess of reality. On this basis a redetermination is possible. Old and new meaning can complement one another (Napoleon as victor of Jena and as defeated of Waterloo) or be disjunctive. In the latter case there is a conflict or correction: that which is intended is not merely more than we intend, but other. To the extent that the reversibility of our assumptions presupposes the incompleteness of our experience, this is of fundamental importance.

Answer 1

同样的事情保持恒定的大小和颜色的改变,尽管距离、角度和照明;不同的东西都是例子,一个类型的对象(树,房子,等等),学习能力也指的是典型的仪器和情况;最后,恒久的意义intersubjectively斡旋个人经验和行动之间的不同。
该恒定的指示和语境经验的基础上,它是相对的可靠性和熟悉事物的世界。只要这个身份的意思是,在一个固定的框架的经验,为进一步的决定只允许。我们正面临着这里是一个开放的特定的规则结构内。下列因素表明该恒定不是绝对的。
(d)潜在的变化的意义。同样的事情也会出现不同的东西。给定的意义并不排放可能有着现实的;每个圆满我们的意图是面对投入多余量给定的,用过多的现实。在此基础上,对一个redetermination是可能的。旧和新意义可以互补(拿破仑失败,如耶维特滑铁卢)或被分隔。后者的例子中,有一种冲突或更正:那是不仅仅是超过了我们的意愿,但其他。在某种程度上,我们的假设相反的过程本身的经验,这是我们的根本的重要性。

Answer 2

同样的事情保持距离的变化，尽管角度和照明固定大小和颜色;采取不同的东西成为对象的一个单一类型的例子（一树，房子等）;学习技能还提到典型的文书和情况，最后，主体间的意义不同个体之间的调解经验和行动坚定不移。
这恒常提供经验和背景的指令，它是对的事情相对可靠性的基础上与世界的了解。只要这是保持身份的意思，一个固定的框架内，只允许作进一步确定行动的经验。我们现在面临着这里是一个在特定的规则结构的开放性。下列因素表明，这种恒定是不是绝对的。
（d）项所指的潜在变化。同样的事情也可以表现为不同的东西。给定的意义并不排气现实的可能意蕴;每一个实现我们的意图是与面临的过剩给定，与现实的过剩。在此基础上重新确定是可能的。旧的和新的含义可以互相补充（拿破仑作为胜利者的耶拿和滑铁卢战败），或析取。在后一种情况是有冲突或更正：即该议定书的目的不只是比我们更打算，但其他。从某种程度上说，我们的假设可逆性的前提是我们的经验不完备，这是至关重要的。