关于电影的英语作文，单词不用多，主要是做手抄报用，谢谢大家了，大家百度也行，找一篇就行，谢谢大家了
关于电影的英语作文，单词不用多，主要是做手抄报用，谢谢大家了，大家百度也行，找一篇就行，谢谢大家了，急急急急急急急急急急急急急急急急急急急急急急急急急急急急急急急急急急...
关于电影的英语作文，单词不用多，主要是做手抄报用，谢谢大家了，大家百度也行，找一篇就行，谢谢大家了，急急急急急急急急急急急急急急急急急急急急急急急急急急急急急急急急急急
展开
展开全部
Ice Age 冰河世纪 英语影评(删减一下也可)
It’s not particularly surprising to be disappointed by any computer-animated film not bearing the Pixar logo. In fact, until Shrek, 2001’s rollicking success, I wouldn’t have even believed it could happen. What is surprising, is that Ice Age doesn’t even ATTEMPT to reach Pixar’s Toy Story heights, apparently content to revel in its status as Monster’s, Inc.'s second rate, half wit cousin.
Ice Age is yet another “extinction for kids” movie, one of many in a long line of baby dinosaurs, pterodactyl eggs, and sympathetic cavemen. This time, it’s the ice age, and wooly mammoths roam the earth alongside primitive man. Strangely enough, in this early world, animals can talk, and humans cannot. But when a group of would-be-enemies discover a lost human baby, wooly mammoth (Ray Romano), saber-toothed tiger (Dennis Leary), and giant sloth (John Leguizamo) must work along side each other in a journey to return the child to its home.
Visually, Ice Age is perhaps the poorest bit of CGI I have ever seen. Contrasted to the beautiful constructs of Monsters, Inc.; or even the gooey, gloppy creativity of Shrek; Ice Age is nothing but badly rendered polygons and Acme animated characters. No hint of photo-realism here. It’s like comparing a Bugs Bunny Cartoon to The Lion King. Actually, I suspect that is exactly what the folks at Ice Age were going for.
Ice Age is really little more than a collection of silly animal gags and Leguizamo one liners. Some of them are even quite funny. If that is all that we’re going for here, then I suppose I’m all for it. But then there are these strange attempts at gut wrenching sappiness, which fall painfully flat amidst sub-video game animation. Frankly, I’m not even sure the CGI they use here is up to the task of displaying the kinds of emotions these people are trying to illicit from their characters. The humans more closely resemble totem poles than they do living, breathing, creatures. It’s laughable watching their polygon-limited faces trying to emote in response to the story’s attempts at heartfelt, soft touches.
Thankfully, the main characters are animals, which are at least bearably rendered to slapstick fun levels. As a result, what slapstick there is, is highly entertaining. Sure, Ray Romano’s vocal talents aren’t particularly spectacular. But Dennis Leary and the always-odd John Leguizamo cover for his mammoth ineptitude without hesitation.
The story itself is bland, boring, and uninspired, as is the almost laughably bad animation. The film’s only real saving graces are some slapstick side trips into the world of an unlucky squirrel and a group of soon-to-be-extinct melon-hoarding dodos. Ice Age’s comedy is worthy of Bugs, but unless you’re under 5, you’ll be bored with everything else.
It’s not particularly surprising to be disappointed by any computer-animated film not bearing the Pixar logo. In fact, until Shrek, 2001’s rollicking success, I wouldn’t have even believed it could happen. What is surprising, is that Ice Age doesn’t even ATTEMPT to reach Pixar’s Toy Story heights, apparently content to revel in its status as Monster’s, Inc.'s second rate, half wit cousin.
Ice Age is yet another “extinction for kids” movie, one of many in a long line of baby dinosaurs, pterodactyl eggs, and sympathetic cavemen. This time, it’s the ice age, and wooly mammoths roam the earth alongside primitive man. Strangely enough, in this early world, animals can talk, and humans cannot. But when a group of would-be-enemies discover a lost human baby, wooly mammoth (Ray Romano), saber-toothed tiger (Dennis Leary), and giant sloth (John Leguizamo) must work along side each other in a journey to return the child to its home.
Visually, Ice Age is perhaps the poorest bit of CGI I have ever seen. Contrasted to the beautiful constructs of Monsters, Inc.; or even the gooey, gloppy creativity of Shrek; Ice Age is nothing but badly rendered polygons and Acme animated characters. No hint of photo-realism here. It’s like comparing a Bugs Bunny Cartoon to The Lion King. Actually, I suspect that is exactly what the folks at Ice Age were going for.
Ice Age is really little more than a collection of silly animal gags and Leguizamo one liners. Some of them are even quite funny. If that is all that we’re going for here, then I suppose I’m all for it. But then there are these strange attempts at gut wrenching sappiness, which fall painfully flat amidst sub-video game animation. Frankly, I’m not even sure the CGI they use here is up to the task of displaying the kinds of emotions these people are trying to illicit from their characters. The humans more closely resemble totem poles than they do living, breathing, creatures. It’s laughable watching their polygon-limited faces trying to emote in response to the story’s attempts at heartfelt, soft touches.
Thankfully, the main characters are animals, which are at least bearably rendered to slapstick fun levels. As a result, what slapstick there is, is highly entertaining. Sure, Ray Romano’s vocal talents aren’t particularly spectacular. But Dennis Leary and the always-odd John Leguizamo cover for his mammoth ineptitude without hesitation.
The story itself is bland, boring, and uninspired, as is the almost laughably bad animation. The film’s only real saving graces are some slapstick side trips into the world of an unlucky squirrel and a group of soon-to-be-extinct melon-hoarding dodos. Ice Age’s comedy is worthy of Bugs, but unless you’re under 5, you’ll be bored with everything else.
已赞过
已踩过<
评论
收起
你对这个回答的评价是？
展开全部
The movie is by the activity and slide-show art combined with neuroscientists have developed a kind of modern art.Is a can accommodate literature drama,photography,painting,music,dance,art DuoZhong comprehensive art,but it also has the artistic characteristics of alone.The movie in the artistic expression on not only have a variety of other art characteristics,and because this can use montage of strong artistic skill,has formed the movie beyond all other means the performance of art.
The movie a with modern science and technology achievements for tools and materials,and USES create visual image and the lens of performance means,formed in the screen of space and time,in the shape of the combination of the great movement,realistic specific image,to reflect the social life of modern art.Movies can accurately "reduction" the real world,give a person with BiZhenGan,close move,just like the scene.The film features,it can satisfy people the broader,more real feel the desire to live in.
电影是由活动照相术和幻灯放映术结合发展起来的一种现代艺术.是一门可以容纳文学戏剧、摄影、绘画、音乐、舞蹈等多种艺术的综合艺术,但它又具有独自的艺术特征.电影在艺术表现力上不但具有其它各种艺术的特征,又因可以运用蒙太奇这种艺术性极强的电影组接技巧,具有超越其它一切艺术的表现手段.
电影一种以现代科技成果为工具与材料,运用创造视觉形象和镜头组接的表现手段,在银幕的空间和时间里,塑造运动的、音画结合的、逼真的具体形象,以反映社会生活的现代艺术.电影能准确地“还原”现实世界,给人以逼真感、亲近感,宛如身临其境.电影的这种特性,可以满足人们更广阔、更真实地感受生活的愿望.
The movie a with modern science and technology achievements for tools and materials,and USES create visual image and the lens of performance means,formed in the screen of space and time,in the shape of the combination of the great movement,realistic specific image,to reflect the social life of modern art.Movies can accurately "reduction" the real world,give a person with BiZhenGan,close move,just like the scene.The film features,it can satisfy people the broader,more real feel the desire to live in.
电影是由活动照相术和幻灯放映术结合发展起来的一种现代艺术.是一门可以容纳文学戏剧、摄影、绘画、音乐、舞蹈等多种艺术的综合艺术,但它又具有独自的艺术特征.电影在艺术表现力上不但具有其它各种艺术的特征,又因可以运用蒙太奇这种艺术性极强的电影组接技巧,具有超越其它一切艺术的表现手段.
电影一种以现代科技成果为工具与材料,运用创造视觉形象和镜头组接的表现手段,在银幕的空间和时间里,塑造运动的、音画结合的、逼真的具体形象,以反映社会生活的现代艺术.电影能准确地“还原”现实世界,给人以逼真感、亲近感,宛如身临其境.电影的这种特性,可以满足人们更广阔、更真实地感受生活的愿望.
追问
好谢谢您
已赞过
已踩过<
评论
收起
你对这个回答的评价是？
展开全部
钱少了 笨
更多追问追答
追问
我不用你
你才一级
已赞过
已踩过<
评论
收起
你对这个回答的评价是？
更多回答（1）
推荐律师服务：
若未解决您的问题，请您详细描述您的问题，通过百度律临进行免费专业咨询
