Question

帮忙翻译下吧，不胜感激

Gathering of information in the internet
environment is very challenging since the information may be
available at different places. There are many methods to gather
information and one of it is by way of discovery of document.
This discovery process is adopted when preparing one’s case for
a full trial. It is used to gather information which is not
adequate and the party needs to get relevant documents from
the opposite party as to complete his case. The opposite party in
the suits may be an individual, company, government agency or
its servant. When the court order for discovery the opposite
party is expected to comply with it but in some cases, the
opposite party refuses to do so citing privacy issue as his or their
reason for refusal. The issues are how to effectively implement
discovery against them and how to balance between the right to
discovery and right to protect the privacy of their clients. What
is actually their liability towards the plaintiff and what are the
consequences of failure to comply with discovery order. This
paper will discuss and analyse the above issues by presenting
laws and court decisions pertaining to discovery of documents
as practiced in Malaysia and several other countries.

Answer 1

在互联网信息采集
环境是非常具有挑战性，因为信息可以
在不同的地方。有许多方法来收集
信息之一，它通过发现文件。
这个发现的过程是通过制备一案时
一个完整的审判。它是用来收集信息，这是不
充分，党需要得到相关的文件
对方当事人为完成他的案件。相反的方
此次诉讼可能是个人，公司，政府机构或
它的仆人。当法院为了发现对面
党将遵守，但在某些情况下，该
对方拒绝这样做并为他或他们的隐私问题
拒绝的理由。问题是如何有效地实施
发现攻击他们，如何权之间的平衡
发现和保护客户的隐私权。什么
实际上是对原告的责任是什么
未遵守发现命令的后果。这
本文将讨论和通过分析上面的问题
法律和法院判决的有关文书的发现
在马来西亚和其他几个国家的实践。