求一篇200字的作文 速度 在线等！！！
第一篇：Doyouagreeordisagreewiththefollowingstatement?Televisionhasdestoryedcommunityamon...
第一篇：Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Television has destoryed community among friends and family.Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.
第二篇： Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is better to be a member of a group than to be the leader of a group.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
两片任选。。急！！ 展开
第二篇： Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is better to be a member of a group than to be the leader of a group.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
两片任选。。急！！ 展开
展开全部
Yes, I completely agree with the statement that it is better to be a member of a group than to be the leader of a group. Realistically, mentally, and physically, being just a member is much easier. Realistically, the fault of the group will be blamed onto the leader, not the members. Mentally, most things happening in a group have to be planned by the leader and dealt with by the leader. Physically, leaders have to be at every important event and on the contrary, members don't.
The above differences between a leader and a common member in a group are clearly shown in the German government during World War II. Hitler, as the leader of Germany, had to take all the blame for the many immoral things the German army did during the war. We know that even though he deserved his fate, the whole catastrophe wasn’t caused by him alone. Mentally, Hitler had to plan the industrial recovery of German alone, although it wasn’t for a good purpose, as a leader, he struggled for many years trying to get Germany’s economy to what it once was. Lastly, physically Hitler had to attend all the event held in Germany during the war time and could not had been able to run away when the Germany defenses fell apart later in the war. As a leader, he physically gave away his life for the failure of the group. However, in contrast to the leader mentioned above, members of the German army weren’t all punished after the war and did not all take responsibilities during the war. As the subordinates of the “evil government” many of them were let off easy.
In conclusion, being a mere member is way better than being a leader of a group.
The above differences between a leader and a common member in a group are clearly shown in the German government during World War II. Hitler, as the leader of Germany, had to take all the blame for the many immoral things the German army did during the war. We know that even though he deserved his fate, the whole catastrophe wasn’t caused by him alone. Mentally, Hitler had to plan the industrial recovery of German alone, although it wasn’t for a good purpose, as a leader, he struggled for many years trying to get Germany’s economy to what it once was. Lastly, physically Hitler had to attend all the event held in Germany during the war time and could not had been able to run away when the Germany defenses fell apart later in the war. As a leader, he physically gave away his life for the failure of the group. However, in contrast to the leader mentioned above, members of the German army weren’t all punished after the war and did not all take responsibilities during the war. As the subordinates of the “evil government” many of them were let off easy.
In conclusion, being a mere member is way better than being a leader of a group.
本回答由提问者推荐
已赞过
已踩过<
评论
收起
你对这个回答的评价是？
展开全部
一天一日通过好人与体育吐吐天宇天宇天宇uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu而二人太好vgfrsdydgxgcjdststdgdddddddddddgsdwyfdwszhxzgcxfgfcwdydhh摄氏度的的点对点的独特太太太太太太太太太特人突然一天一样一样一样一样他人好日日日日日日日语好一天会让他一回头一日一日一哈哈fsfgfdvrtyrwhklxzcvbnmjhgfdsdsrertryt75y547666合法化热7uewte627e9wyqetq8euiqte无缺企业认为惹我玩儿我一日一日房改房因为分隔一个服务个人土覆盖的素养如图同日方公司法告诉法院告诉二人官员赴各地方市场vshjsfvf是大方点回复是福特让人峰会的设计方一位辅导员说
已赞过
已踩过<
评论
收起
你对这个回答的评价是？
推荐律师服务：
若未解决您的问题，请您详细描述您的问题，通过百度律临进行免费专业咨询
