Question

法律英语翻译网

A person who suffers legal damages may be able to use tort law to
receive compensation from someone who is legally responsible,or “liable”,for those injuries..Torts cover intentional acts and accidents.
For instance ,Alice throws a ball and accidentally hits Brenda in the eye.Brenda may sue Alice for losses occasioned by the accident(e.g.,costs of medical treatment,lost income during time off work,pain and suffering,etc.)whether or not Brenda wins her suit depends on if she can prove Alice engaged in tortious conduct.
One of the main topics of the substance of tort law is determining the “standard of care”—a legal phrase that means distinguishing between when conduct is or is not tortious.Put another way, the big issue is whether a person suffers the loss from his own injury ,or whether it gets transferred to someone else.
If it was an accident,Brenda must prove negligence.To do this,Brenda must show that her injury was reasonable foreseeable,that Alice owed Brenda a duty of care not to hit her with the ball,and that Alice failed to meet the standard of care required.
In much of the western world ,the touchstone of tort liability is negligence.If the injured party cannot prove that the person believed to have caused the injury acted with negligence,at the very least,tort law will not compensate them.Tort law also recognizes intentional torts and strict liability,which apply to defendants who engage in certain actions.
亲们可以不用翻译软件吗 这样我也会呀！！

Answer 1

a person who患有may be able to use法律金错Law to receive从某人谁是legally负责赔偿金”，承担责任”，for those损伤..torts封面intentional Acts and事故例如，爱丽丝throws球和不小心打布伦达的眼睛。布伦达May苏爱丽丝for损失事故（例如，occasioned by the costs of medical treatment，失去的收入在时间关闭工作，面包和痛苦，等。）whether or not布伦达赢得她如果她能证明是取决于我们tortious爱丽丝engaged in行为one of the手topics of the物质是Determining the Law of错了“护理标准”句that means区别之间的法律行为是当金is not tortious。put another way，The Big Issue is whether a person患有the loss from his own损伤，或whether it gets transferred to别人如果它是年的事故，布伦达必须证明疏忽。要做到这一点，我要展示她的损伤是合理的Foreseeable，，爱丽丝欠布伦达duty of care not to hit her with the球，and that爱丽丝failed to meet the standard of care requiredin much of the Western World，试金石of错责任是玩忽职守。if the injured party不能证明that the person to have caused the损伤认为做以及疏忽，at the very least，will not compensate他们错法。错误的法律也承认intentional错误和严格责任，which apply to engage in一定defendants谁的行动

Answer 2

一个人遭受法律赔偿可能能够使用侵权法
接受赔偿法律责任的人,或者“责任”,对那些伤害. .侵权故意行为和事故的发生。
例如,爱丽丝抛出一个球,意外地击中了布伦达的眼睛。布伦达可能起诉爱丽丝损失引起的事故(如。、医疗费用、损失的收入在下班时间,痛苦等)是否Brenda赢得她的衣服取决于她是否能证明爱丽丝从事侵权行为。
的主要议题之一侵权法的实质是确定的“标准”——法律名词,是指当行为是否侵权行为的区分。换句话说,最大的问题是一个人是否遭受损失从自己的伤害,或是否会转移到别人了。
如果那是一次意外,布伦达必须证明过失。为此,布伦达必须表明她的伤是合理的可预见的,爱丽丝欠布伦达的注意义务不与球,打她,爱丽丝没有达到所需的医护标准。
在西方世界的很多地方,是过失侵权责任的试金石。如果受害人不能证明的人认为造成伤害和过失行为,至少,侵权法不能补偿他们。侵权法也承认故意侵权和严格责任,它适用于被告从事某些行为。

Answer 3

一个人遭受法律赔偿可能能够使用侵权法
　　接受赔偿法律责任的人,或者“责任”,对那些伤害. .侵权故意行为和事故的发生。
　　例如,爱丽丝抛出一个球,意外地击中了布伦达的眼睛。布伦达可能起诉爱丽丝损失引起的事故(如。、医疗费用、损失的收入在下班时间,痛苦等)是否Brenda赢得她的衣服取决于爱丽丝如果她能证明了我