Question

英文翻译 谢谢啦

Nowadays, a standard for measuring power has changed. These changes foretell a new standard for measuring power. No longer will a nation's political influence be based solely on the strength of its military forces. Of course, military effectiveness will remain a primary measure of power. But political influence is also closely tied to industrial competitiveness. It's often said that without its military the Soviet Union would really be a third-world nation. The new standard of power and influence that is evolving now places more emphasis on the ability of a country to compete effectively in the economic markets of the world.
America must recognize this new course of events. Our success in shaping world events over the past 40 years has been the direct result of our ability to adapt technology and to take advantage of the capabilities of our people for the purpose of maintaining peace. Our industrial prowess (杰出才能) over most of this period was unchallenged. It is ironic that it is just the prowess that has enabled other countries to prosper(繁荣) and in turn to threaten our industrial leadership.
The competitiveness of America's industrial base is an issue bigger than the Department of Defense and is going to require the efforts of the major institutional forces in our society--not be a strong force in the process because we will. But we simply cannot be, nor should we be, liked upon by others as the savior (救星) of American industry.

Answer 1

译：
如今，测量功率变化的标准。这些变化预测的新标准的检测能力。将不再是国家的政治影响是完全基于它的军事实力。当然，军事效能将仍然是基本的权利。但是政治影响力也密不可分的产业竞争力。人们常说，没有它的军事苏联就真的是三分之一世界国家。这个新标准的权力和影响力，是进化现在更强调一个国家在世界经济市场的有效竞争能力。
美国必须认识到这种新的活动的过程。我们在塑造世界的事件，在过去40年的成功是我们去适应技术和利用我们的人的能力的目的是为了维护和平的能力的直接结果。我们的工业实力在这一时期的大部分时间是无可匹敌的。具有讽刺意味的是，这仅仅是实力，使得其他国家的繁荣反过来威胁我们的工业的领导。
美国的工业竞争力的基础是一个问题比国防部需要在我们的社会中主要的制度力量的努力——不是在处理一个强烈的力，因为我们会。但我们不能，我们也不应该，喜欢在别人的救世主美国工业。

望采纳！