急需一篇有关music的英语短文
1个回答
展开全部
Music is an art,entertainment,or other human activity which involves organized and audible sound,though definitions vary.
Allegory of Music,by Filippino Lippi
Allegory of Music,by Lorenzo Lippi Music Portal
The definition of music as sound with particular characteristics is taken as a given by psychoacoustics,and is a mon one in musicology and performance.In this view,there are observable patterns to what is broadly labeled music,and while there are understandable cultural variations,the properties of music are the properties of sound as perceived and processed by people.
Traditional philosophies define music as tones ordered horizontally (as melodies) and vertically (as harmonies).Music theory,within this realm,is studied with the presupposition that music is orderly and often pleasant to hear.
John Cage is the most famous advocate of the idea that anything can be music,saying,for example,"There is no noise,only sound," though some argue that this somewhat fascistically imposes the definition on everything.According to musicologist Jean-Jacques Nattiez (1990 p.47-8,55):"The border between music and noise is always culturally defined--which implies that,even within a single society,this border does not always pass through the same place; in short,there is rarely a consensus.By all accounts there is no single and intercultural universal concept defining what music might be."
In support of the view that music is a label for a totality of different aspects which are culturally constructed.Often a definition of music lists the aspects or elements that make up music.Molino (1975:43) argues that,in addition to a lack of consensus,"any element belonging to the total musical fact can be isolated,or taken as a strategic variable of musical production." Nattiez gives as examples Mauricio Kagel's Con Voce [with voice],where a masked trio silently mimes playing instruments.In this example sound,a mon element,is excluded,while gesture,a less mon element,is given primacy.
The platonic ideal of music is currently the least fashionable in the philosophy of critici *** and music,because it is crowded on one side by the physical view - what is the metasubstance of music made of,if not sound?- and on the other hand by the constructed view of music - how can one tell the difference between any metanarrative of music and one which is merely intersubjective?However,its appeal,finding unexpected mathematical relationships in music,and finding *** ogies between music and physics,for example string theory,means that this view continues to find adherents,including such critics and performers as Charles Rosen and Edward Rothstein.
Allegory of Music,by Filippino Lippi
Allegory of Music,by Lorenzo Lippi Music Portal
The definition of music as sound with particular characteristics is taken as a given by psychoacoustics,and is a mon one in musicology and performance.In this view,there are observable patterns to what is broadly labeled music,and while there are understandable cultural variations,the properties of music are the properties of sound as perceived and processed by people.
Traditional philosophies define music as tones ordered horizontally (as melodies) and vertically (as harmonies).Music theory,within this realm,is studied with the presupposition that music is orderly and often pleasant to hear.
John Cage is the most famous advocate of the idea that anything can be music,saying,for example,"There is no noise,only sound," though some argue that this somewhat fascistically imposes the definition on everything.According to musicologist Jean-Jacques Nattiez (1990 p.47-8,55):"The border between music and noise is always culturally defined--which implies that,even within a single society,this border does not always pass through the same place; in short,there is rarely a consensus.By all accounts there is no single and intercultural universal concept defining what music might be."
In support of the view that music is a label for a totality of different aspects which are culturally constructed.Often a definition of music lists the aspects or elements that make up music.Molino (1975:43) argues that,in addition to a lack of consensus,"any element belonging to the total musical fact can be isolated,or taken as a strategic variable of musical production." Nattiez gives as examples Mauricio Kagel's Con Voce [with voice],where a masked trio silently mimes playing instruments.In this example sound,a mon element,is excluded,while gesture,a less mon element,is given primacy.
The platonic ideal of music is currently the least fashionable in the philosophy of critici *** and music,because it is crowded on one side by the physical view - what is the metasubstance of music made of,if not sound?- and on the other hand by the constructed view of music - how can one tell the difference between any metanarrative of music and one which is merely intersubjective?However,its appeal,finding unexpected mathematical relationships in music,and finding *** ogies between music and physics,for example string theory,means that this view continues to find adherents,including such critics and performers as Charles Rosen and Edward Rothstein.
已赞过
已踩过<
评论
收起
你对这个回答的评价是?
推荐律师服务:
若未解决您的问题,请您详细描述您的问题,通过百度律临进行免费专业咨询
广告 您可能关注的内容 |