Question

求翻译不要谷歌百度有道没逻辑的翻译 要人工的 谢谢你

The idea is to use a set of ratios in an overview as the basis for the financial risk management.This provides even more information than the analysis of historical data and allows reacting fast on critical developments and managing the identified risks. However not only the internal data can be used for the risk management. In addition to that also the information available in the papers can be used.Some of them state average values for the defaulted or bankrupt companies one year prior bankruptcy -and few papers also for a longer time horizon. Those values can be used as a comparison value to evaluate the risk situation of the company. For this an appropriate set of ratios has to be chosen.
The ratios, which will be included in the overview and analysis sheet, should fulfill two main requirements. First of all they should match the main financial risks of the company in order to deliver significant information and not miss an important risk factor. Secondly the ratios need to be relevant in two different ways. On the one hand they should be applicable independently of other ratios. This means that they also deliver useful information when not used in a regression, as it is applied in many of the papers. On the other hand to be appropriate to use them, the ratios need to show a different development for healthy companies than for those under financial distress. The difference between the values of the two groups should be large enough to see into which the observed company belongs.

Answer 1

建议在概述中使用一个理论模型作为财务风险管理的基本原则，这比历史数据的分析提供更多信息并且能够立即影响到关键开发模式和管理已发现的风险。定距数据和文献上的数据都能够用于财务风险管理，部分文献陈述了违约或破产的公司的平均值，少数文献介绍了这种情况发生的界限。这些能作为一个参考值来评估公司的风险状况，因此一个应该选择一个合适的理论模型。
在概述和分析表格中应该包含完成两个必要条件的比率，首先概述和分析表哥中应该适合主要财务风险，这样才能提供重要资料且不漏掉任何重要的风险因素，这意味着它们需要提供过去没有出现的但在很多文献中提到的有用的信息，另外为了能合适的使用概述和风险表格，比率应该展现针对健康公司而不是那些处于财务困境下的公司的不同的发展方向,这两类值之间的差异应该足够大以便了解被观察的公司属于哪种情况

追答

能力有限翻译有错误请见谅