帮忙翻译成中文,用软件的不要进,谢谢
Personalinterviewing(面试)ismosteffectivewhenallthepeopletobeinterviewedarelocatedinare...
Personal interviewing (面试) is most effective when all the people to be interviewed are located in a relatively small geographical area. Otherwise, the time and expense spent in traveling from one person to another makes this type of interviewing economically impractical. Personal interviewing is usually used when the information needed is too complex to be gathered by another technique. For example, a problem being studied may require the interviewer to probe beyond the more superficial answers that might be obtained with another method.
It is sometimes assumed that personal interviewing is the most accurate of all survey research techniques. Although personal interviewing may be accurate in many cases, human errors may prevent a researcher from obtaining valid results. Questions perceived by the interviewee (应试者) as an invasion of privacy or threatening in any way will probably produce false or partially true answers. Also, since the interviewer (面试者) must interpret the respondent's statements, a certain amount of information loss results even though the respondent may be answering truthfully.
In spite of the problems, at least two major advantages are provided by this research technique. First, the alert interviewer can generally tell if the respondent is being truthful or if he or she is giving superficial or untrue responses. Second, the interviewer can rephrase questions, give more explanation, or probe more deeply if the initial questions do not produce the information desired. As a result, the information gleaned should be more accurate than that provided by interviews where no one is present to clarify questions or to interpret answers. 展开
It is sometimes assumed that personal interviewing is the most accurate of all survey research techniques. Although personal interviewing may be accurate in many cases, human errors may prevent a researcher from obtaining valid results. Questions perceived by the interviewee (应试者) as an invasion of privacy or threatening in any way will probably produce false or partially true answers. Also, since the interviewer (面试者) must interpret the respondent's statements, a certain amount of information loss results even though the respondent may be answering truthfully.
In spite of the problems, at least two major advantages are provided by this research technique. First, the alert interviewer can generally tell if the respondent is being truthful or if he or she is giving superficial or untrue responses. Second, the interviewer can rephrase questions, give more explanation, or probe more deeply if the initial questions do not produce the information desired. As a result, the information gleaned should be more accurate than that provided by interviews where no one is present to clarify questions or to interpret answers. 展开
1个回答
展开全部
Personal interviewing (面试) is most effective when all the people to be interviewed are located in a relatively small geographical area. Otherwise, the time and expense spent in traveling from one person to another makes this type of interviewing economically impractical. Personal interviewing is usually used when the information needed is too complex to be gathered by another technique. For example, a problem being studied may require the interviewer to probe beyond the more superficial answers that might be obtained with another method.
当所有接受采访的人聚集在相对较小的地方时,此刻的面谈调查效率最高。否则的话,从一个接受采访的人转移到另一个所花的时间和金钱让这种采访不划算。当所需信息太复杂而难以用其他方法收集时,人们通常采用面谈调查这种方法。例如,进行采访的人可能因正在研究的难题而去探讨更深层次的答案,他可以通过其他方法得到这些答案。
It is sometimes assumed that personal interviewing is the most accurate of all survey research techniques. Although personal interviewing may be accurate in many cases, human errors may prevent a researcher from obtaining valid results. Questions perceived by the interviewee (应试者) as an invasion of privacy or threatening in any way will probably produce false or partially true answers. Also, since the interviewer (面试者) must interpret the respondent's statements, a certain amount of information loss results even though the respondent may be answering truthfully.
人们有时候认为面谈调查是所有调查研究方法中最准确的。尽管面谈调查在很多方面可能很准确,但人们的失误也许会妨碍研究员得到有效的结果。如果接受采访认为问题侵犯了他们的隐私或对他们构成了各种威胁,他们很有可能给出假的答案或部分真实的答案。由于进行采访的人必须解释应答者的回答,因此即使应答者真实地回答问题,也会造成一定数量的信息流失。
In spite of the problems, at least two major advantages are provided by this research technique. First, the alert interviewer can generally tell if the respondent is being truthful or if he or she is giving superficial or untrue responses. Second, the interviewer can rephrase questions, give more explanation, or probe more deeply if the initial questions do not produce the information desired. As a result, the information gleaned should be more accurate than that provided by interviews where no one is present to clarify questions or to interpret answers.
尽管使用在这种研究方法时会遇到难题,但是它至少有两大优点。第一,进行采访的人警觉度高,他通常能分辨出应答者是否诚实,是否如实回答问题。第二,如果进行采访的人不能从最初的问题得到想要的信息,他可以复述问题,给出更多的解释,或者进行深层次的调查。因此,收集到的信息应该比那些无人在场解释问题或答案的调查得来的信息更准确。
附:你好,请问这是有关面试的文章吗?我觉得是关于调查的文章,不知道你对我的翻译满意吗?
当所有接受采访的人聚集在相对较小的地方时,此刻的面谈调查效率最高。否则的话,从一个接受采访的人转移到另一个所花的时间和金钱让这种采访不划算。当所需信息太复杂而难以用其他方法收集时,人们通常采用面谈调查这种方法。例如,进行采访的人可能因正在研究的难题而去探讨更深层次的答案,他可以通过其他方法得到这些答案。
It is sometimes assumed that personal interviewing is the most accurate of all survey research techniques. Although personal interviewing may be accurate in many cases, human errors may prevent a researcher from obtaining valid results. Questions perceived by the interviewee (应试者) as an invasion of privacy or threatening in any way will probably produce false or partially true answers. Also, since the interviewer (面试者) must interpret the respondent's statements, a certain amount of information loss results even though the respondent may be answering truthfully.
人们有时候认为面谈调查是所有调查研究方法中最准确的。尽管面谈调查在很多方面可能很准确,但人们的失误也许会妨碍研究员得到有效的结果。如果接受采访认为问题侵犯了他们的隐私或对他们构成了各种威胁,他们很有可能给出假的答案或部分真实的答案。由于进行采访的人必须解释应答者的回答,因此即使应答者真实地回答问题,也会造成一定数量的信息流失。
In spite of the problems, at least two major advantages are provided by this research technique. First, the alert interviewer can generally tell if the respondent is being truthful or if he or she is giving superficial or untrue responses. Second, the interviewer can rephrase questions, give more explanation, or probe more deeply if the initial questions do not produce the information desired. As a result, the information gleaned should be more accurate than that provided by interviews where no one is present to clarify questions or to interpret answers.
尽管使用在这种研究方法时会遇到难题,但是它至少有两大优点。第一,进行采访的人警觉度高,他通常能分辨出应答者是否诚实,是否如实回答问题。第二,如果进行采访的人不能从最初的问题得到想要的信息,他可以复述问题,给出更多的解释,或者进行深层次的调查。因此,收集到的信息应该比那些无人在场解释问题或答案的调查得来的信息更准确。
附:你好,请问这是有关面试的文章吗?我觉得是关于调查的文章,不知道你对我的翻译满意吗?
推荐律师服务:
若未解决您的问题,请您详细描述您的问题,通过百度律临进行免费专业咨询