Question

在线求翻译..

Arnott and Inci [Arnott, R. and Inci, E., 2006. An integrated model of downtown parking and traffic congestion. Journal of Urban Economics 60, 418–442] developed an integrated model of curbside parking and traffic congestion in a downtown area. Curbside parking is exogenously priced below its social opportunity cost, and the stock of cars cruising for parking, which contributes to traffic congestion, adjusts to clear the market for curbside parking spaces. Denser downtown areas have garage as well as curbside parking. Because of economies of scale in garage construction, garages are discretely spaced. The friction of space confers market power on parking garages. Spatial competition between parking garages, as modeled in Arnott [Arnott, R., 2006. Spatial competition between downtown parking garages and downtown parking policy. Transport Policy 13, 458–469], determines the equilibrium garage parking fee and spacing between parking garages. Also, the stock of cars cruising for parking adjusts to equalize the full prices of curbside and garage parking. This paper combines the ingredients of these two models, hence presenting an integrated model of curbside parking, garage parking, and traffic congestion, and examines curbside parking policy in this context through a numerical example with parameters representative of a medium-sized US city. The central result is that raising the curbside parking fee appears to be a very attractive policy since it generates efficiency gains that may be several times as large as the increased revenue raised.
大哥真夸张，，，直接在线翻译就发来了，看看成什么句子？？？？？

Answer 1

Arnott和Inci[Arnott > >和Inci,2006。集成模型的泊车和交通堵塞。市中心《城市经济发展,418-442 60集成模型[j].路边停车和交通拥堵在市区中心。路边停车是exogenously定价低于其社会的机会成本、存货的汽车巡航停车,使交通拥堵,调整以明确的市场为路边停车空间。致密市区有车库以及路边停车。由于经济规模在车库的建设、车库都假定行距。摩擦的空间能为市场力量在停车场。空间之间的竞争在停车场、Arnott[Arnott作为建模、,2006年。市区空间之间的竞争,市中心的停车场停车泊位的政策。13例,交通政策,确定了458-469]平衡车库停车费、间距停车场。同时,股票的汽车巡航停车,使完整的价格调整的路边停车及地下车库。本文结合的成分,因此这两个模型集成模型的表现,路边停车泊位停车,交通拥挤,并检视路边停车政策在此背景下,通过数值算例与参数的中型我们的城市。中央的结果就是提高路边停车收费似乎是一个非常有吸引力的政策以来,它能提高能源利用效率,也许好几倍增加收入。

Answer 2

阿诺特和入射光[阿诺特，R.和入射光，大肠杆菌，2006年。一个市区停车和交通拥堵的综合模型。城市经济学60，杂志418-442]发展在市区路边的一个停车和交通拥堵的综合模型。路边停车是外生售价低于其社会的机会成本，而停车，这有助于交通挤塞，巡航车库存调整以清除路边停车位的市场。密集的市中心地区有车库以及路边停车。由于经济建设规模的车库，车库是离散的间隔。摩擦的空间赋予车库的市场力量。停车库之间的空间竞争，在阿诺特模型[阿诺特，河，2006年。空间之间的竞争市中心城区停车场和停车政策。运输政策13，458-469]，决定了均衡车库停车费和停车库之间的间距。另外，停车巡航车来平衡库存调整和车库的路边停车全部价格。本文结合这两种模式的成分，因此提出了路边停车，车库停车和交通拥堵的综合模型，并探讨通过与参数的一个中型美国城市的代表在这方面算例路边停车政策。中央结果是提高路边停车费似乎是一个非常有吸引力的政策，因为它可能产生的效率收益大数倍增加收入的提高

Answer 3

Arnott和Inci[Arnott > >和Inci,2006。集成模型的泊车和交通堵塞。市中心《城市经济发展,418-442 60集成模型[j].路边停车和交通拥堵在市区中心。路边停车是exogenously定价低于其社会的机会成本、存货的汽车巡航停车,使交通拥堵,调整以明确的市场为路边停车空间。致密市区有车库curbsid一样