Question

亲亲 英译汉 谢谢

The problematisation of some variants of family and community behaviour and the pathologisation of poverty lends credence to the social control critique. Spicker (1993 : 74) observes that these pathological explanations of poverty have individualistic, familial and subcultural dimensions. Social work was at the centre of this process. The problematising orientation of post-war social work embodied in the concept of 'the problem family' was justified by the widely shared, if ephemeral, belier that structural poverty had been eliminated-in Galbraith's phrase, 'the myth of the affluent society'. The fallacious assumption that poverty would be eliminated by economic growth dominated post-war policy-making. Haveman and Schwabish (1999 : 1) have observed that :'For much of the 1950s and 1960s, this faith in the anti-poverty effectiveness of economic growth seemed well grounded'.

Answer 1

一些家庭和社区的行为和贫困的pathologisation印证社会控制的problematisation批判的变体。斯皮格（1993：74）认为，这些病理解释贫困的个人，家庭和文化维度。社会工作是在这个过程的中心。在problematising取向战后社会工作体现在“问题家庭”的概念是有道理的，广泛共享的，短暂的，信仰，结构性贫困一直在加尔布雷思的话中消除，“小康社会”的神话。贫困是经济增长的主导的战后政策消除错误的假设。哈夫曼和Schwabish（1999：1）所观察到的：“许多1950年代和1960年代，这个信念，在经济增长的反贫困效果似乎有根有据的”。
如果你认可我的回答，敬请及时采纳，
~如果你认可我的回答，请及时点击【采纳为满意回答】按钮
~~手机提问的朋友在客户端右上角评价点【满意】即可。
~你的采纳是我前进的动力
~~O(∩_∩)O，记得好评和采纳，互相帮助