Question

谢谢帮忙翻译一下 急死了

In this paper, I will explore the exceptional
story of Canada through a political economy
perspective, invoked in a general rather than
specific sense. In my view, the two fundamental
assumptions of a political economy framework
are, first, that the two are mutually constitutive
and, second, that neither can be reduced to the
other. I do not imply that a particular type of
political economy approach – for example, neo-
Ricardian or Marxist – animates my analysis. I
begin by discussing three important contextual
elements: the rise of neoliberalism; the performance
of the Canadian economy, and the character
of recent immigration policy. These fundamental
points lead to a core issue for this paper: the relationship
between immigration and the economic
performance of Canada. I next consider the
contradictory discourses that have emerged
in Canada around the economic situation of
immigrants. Basically, immigrants are seen as
essential to Canadian prosperity on the one hand,
but there is also a growing recognition that
immigrants are faring poorly in the Canadian
labour market on the other. The analysis that
follows seeks to explain the declining fortunes
of immigrants in Canada. Subsequently, I return
to the relationship between the political economy
of immigration and the favourable political
atmosphere for immigration and minorities
in Canada. I argue that the two are integrally
related, and that Canadians view immigration
in a positive light, in part, because they see it as
contributing to their wellbeing.

Answer 1

您好 以下为本人手工制作

In this paper, I will explore the exceptional story of Canada through a political economy perspective, invoked in a general rather than specific sense.
在这篇论文中，我将以政治经济学的角度，从更为一般而不是具体的意义上，来探索加拿大特殊的故事。

In my view, the two fundamental assumptions of a political economy framework are, first, that the two are mutually constitutive and, second, that neither can be reduced to the other.
在我看来，政治经济学架构的两个基本假设是：第一，它们之间有互相构建性，第二，两个假设中的任意一个也不会变为另一个。

I do not imply that a particular type of political economy approach – for example, neo-Ricardian or Marxist – animates my analysis.
我并没有说某种特别的政经方法 — 比如，新李嘉图主义或马克思主义 —能够使我的分析更富有活力。

I begin by discussing three important contextual elements: the rise of neoliberalism； the performance of the Canadian economy, and the character of recent immigration policy.
我将以3个重要的前提要件来开始我的讨论：新自由主义的兴起，加拿大经济的表现，以及近来移民政策的特点。

These fundamental points lead to a core issue for this paper: the relationship between immigration and the economic performance of Canada.
这3个基本点会导向本论文的核心论题：移民和加拿大经济表现间的关系。

I next consider the contradictory discourses that have emerged
in Canada around the economic situation of immigrants.
接下来我将会考虑由关于移民经济状况而在加拿大出现的互相矛盾的论述。

Basically, immigrants are seen as essential to Canadian prosperity on the one hand, but there is also a growing recognition that
immigrants are faring poorly in the Canadian labour market on the other.
基本上，一方面移民们被看作是使加拿大繁荣的关键所在，而另一方面，关于移民们在加拿大劳动力市场待遇不佳的共识也越来越为人们所接受。

The analysis that follows seeks to explain the declining fortunes
of immigrants in Canada.
紧接着的分析将会探寻解释移民们在加拿大没落的原因。

Subsequently, I return to the relationship between the political economy of immigration and the favourable political
atmosphere for immigration and minorities in Canada.
然后，我（的论文所论述的内容）将会回到加拿大移民的政治经济和被移民们以及加拿大少数民族所倾心的政治氛围之间的关系。

I argue that the two are integrally related, and that Canadians view immigration in a positive light, in part, because they see it as
contributing to their wellbeing.
我认为这两个（假设）是整体相关的，而且加拿大人民是以积极的眼光看待移民的，至少在部分上，因为他们认为移民对于他们的富足生活功不可没。

希望对你有帮助

Answer 2

在本文中，我将探讨例外
加拿大的故事，通过政治经济
角度来看，而不是在一般调用
特定意义。在我看来，两个基本
假设一个政治经济框架
是，第一，这两者是相互构
第二，这既可以减少到
其他。我并不意味着一个特定类型的
政治经济学的方法 - 例如，新
李嘉图和马克思主义 - 动画我的分析。我
首先讨论了三个重要内容
内容：新自由主义的崛起;的表现
加拿大经济，字符
最近的移民政策。这些基本
点导致对这份文件的核心问题：关系
移民与经济
加拿大的表现。下面我考虑
已经出现的矛盾的论述
在加拿大各地的经济情况
移民。基本上，移民被视为
必须一方面加拿大的繁荣，
但也有越来越认识到，
移民在加拿大命途多舛
劳动力市场上的其他。分析认为
旨在解释如下没落
在加拿大的移民。其后，我回
之间的政治经济关系
移民及有利的政治
移民和少数民族的气氛，
在加拿大。我认为，这两者是一体
相关，而加拿大人看法移民
以积极的眼光，部分是因为他们把它看作
促进他们的身心健康。