Question

高手们，救救我吧，翻译一段话

From the field study it was evident that ineffective inventory control is a major problem and further that even the very basic inventory control concepts are not used in the majority of organisations studied. The general observations made here were similar to the findings of a different study[8] conducted in another developing country. Ineffective inventory control must lead to a great deal of inefficiency in the system and, further, the apparent reluctance to employ basic inventory control techniques must inevitably result in higher inventory costs. Under such conditions of glaring inefficiency and higher operating costs, it is surprising that the companies manage to survive financially. This is largely explained if one looks carefully at the general background of most industries in developing countries. The majority of companies set-up in developing countries tend to be either government or privately owned virtual monopolies in their respective spheres of manufacture. Government policy of encouraging import substitution industries has, in some instances, resulted in the banning of all imports to protect local industry. However, the capacity of industry is often unable to meet demand and hence there is a general shortage of consumer goods. As a result, with few local competitors around, most companies enjoy a virtual monopoly through which they can dictate the price of their products at will. Such a situation enables the manufacturers to pass on any increase in the cost of production, due to their own inefficiency, to the consumers in the form of a higher price, without fear of losing their market share. Further, under such conditions there is no incentive for manufacturers to reduce costs through efficient inventory control techniques. Their main aim is to ensure that raw materials and parts are readily available to meet the production targets set. Certain cost considerations for the reasons stated were given a low priority.

Answer 1

从领域研究它证实了无效的库存控制是一个严重的问题,而且还说即使是很基本的库存控制概念没有被使用在大多数组织研究。一般的观察结果相似,这里曾是不同的研究[8]以另一个发展中国家。无效的库存控制必须导致了大量的低效率的制度,并且再进一步,这明显不愿意雇用基本库存控制技术将不可避免地导致更高的库存成本。条件下的低效率和更高的经营成本,我感到很惊讶,因为公司可以存在经济上的资助。这在很大程度上解释了如果你仔细看那概要背景的多数行业都在发展中国家。大多数的公司建立于发展中国家,往往倾向于要么是政府或私有在各自的领域虚拟垄断的制造。政府的政策鼓励进口替代产业,在有些情况下,导致了禁止所有进口货物保护国内产业。然而,行业的能力往往不能以满足需求,因此这有一般消费品短缺。作为一个结果,与一些本地竞争者四周,大多数公司享受一个虚拟的垄断,藉此决定产品的价格。这种情况下使汽车制造商会将任何的生产成本的增加成时,由于他们的自己的效率低下、消费者的形式,一更高的价格,而不再害怕失去市场份额。此外,在这种情况下他们没有动机为制造商降低成本高效的库存控制技术。他们的主要目的是为了保证原材料和部分是现成的,满足生产目标。一定成本方面原因被给予规定低的公关

翻得好辛苦啊 记得加分哦

Answer 2

从研究领域看，显而易见，无效存货管制是个主要问题，并且甚至大多数研究机构不用非常基础的存货管制概念。在这里，总体数据与不同的研究结果相似，引导着另一个发展中国家。在体系中，无效存货管制必定会导致一定的效率低下，进一步地，使用基础存货管制技术的表观磁阻必然要导致更高的存货成本。在这样明显效率低下和更高营运成本的条件下，这样的公司在金融上存活是出人意料的。主要的原因，如果仔细看大部分工业的整体背景都在发展中国家。在发展中国家，大多数公司在他们各自的制造业领域里机构不是趋向政体就是私人垄断。政府的政策鼓励进口代替制造业，在某些情况下，导致禁止所有进口货物保护国内制造业。然而，制造业的能力往往不能达到要求，所以一般消费品不足。因此，由于本地周围没有竞争者，大部分公司都喜欢随意改变商品价格在实际上垄断。这种情况下使制造厂家在生产成本上继续增加，由于他们自己的效率低，对于消费者以更高的价格形式，不怕失去市场占有率。此外，在这种情况下，没有动机为制造厂家通过高效存货管制技术来降低成本。他们主要的目的是确保原材料和其他材料在生产目标上可用。某些因上述原因的成本因素被放在并不优先的位置上。

Answer 3

拿着牛津词典对着翻译啊