Question

英语求助

Neighborhoods with high levels of collective efficacy may have residents with higher levels of neighborhood attachment (Brown et al., 2003). Collective efficacy is defined as “the link between mutual trust and a shared willingness to intervene for the common good of the neighborhood” (Sampson, Raudenbush, & Earls, 1997), and is comprised of two major components: levels of social cohesion and informal social control within a neighborhood. Social cohesion involves solidarity, trust, and social connections among neighbors. Higher neighborhood attachment levels have been observed in persons who have friendly relationships with their neighbors (Mesch & Manor, 1998; Sampson & Groves, 1989). Informal social control involves feelings of control over neighborhood happenings and conditions, and may be connected to neighborhood attachment, which has been theorized to provide individuals with a sense of security, identity, and control (Proshansky et al., 1983; Riger, LeBailly, & Gordon, 1981).

Answer 1

那些参与过自己家庭内部或是社区园艺活动的居民，
也同时有着更高程度的邻里依恋。园艺是一个所有人都可以参与进去的社区活动（这句话比较难，属于难句子，我没看懂，就这么简单的翻译了一下）。此外，园艺需要家庭成员、朋友以及邻居的积极参与、支持和交流(Ferris, Norman, & Sempik, 2001;Glover, 2004; Kaplan, 1973; Kaplan & Kaplan, 2005; Teig et al.,2009)。这些互动对于增强当地居民的彼此感情十分重要。我们需要进一步调查以便了解：邻里依恋对于那些 关乎于人身体健康行为的 社会以及认知过程的重要性（这句话比较长，小妹看着弄吧）。

Answer 2

Neighborhoods with high levels of collective efficacy may have residents with higher levels of neighborhood attachment (Brown et al., 2003). Collective efficacy is defined as “the link between mutual trust and a shared willingness to intervene for the common good of the neighborhood” (Sampson, Raudenbush, & Earls, 1997), and is comprised of two major components: levels of social cohesion and informal social control within a neighborhood. Social cohesion involves solidarity, trust, and social connections among neighbors. Higher neighborhood attachment levels have been observed in persons who have friendly relationships with their neighbors (Mesch & Manor, 1998; Sampson & Groves, 1989). Informal social control involves feelings of control over neighborhood happenings and conditions, and may be connected to neighborhood attachment, which has been theorized to provide individuals with a sense of security, identity, and control (Proshansky et al., 1983; Riger, LeBailly, & Gordon, 1981). 邻近地区用高度集体的效能可能用比较高度邻近地区附着有居民。（布朗等人， 2003) 集体的效能被定义为 " 联编在相互的信赖和被分享的自动自发之间为邻近地区 (Sampson ， Raudenbush， & 伯爵， 1997)的共同美好事物干涉 ", 而且两个主要成份被包含： 在邻近地区里面的社会结合和非正式的社会控制的程度。 社会的结合包括在邻居之中的团结、信赖和社会的连接。 比较高的邻近地区附着水平已经在有和他们的邻居的友好关系的人中被观察. （Mesch ＆庄园， 1998; Sampson ＆小树林， 1989) 非正式的社会控制包括对邻近地区的控制事件的感觉和情况，而且可能被连接到已经被建立理论提供安全感、身份和控制给个体的邻近地区附着。（Proshansky 等人， 1983; 装配， LeBailly， & 戈登， 1981)

Answer 3

邻近地区用高度集体的效能可能用比较高度邻近地区附着有居民。（布朗等人， 2003) 集体的效能被定义为 " 联编在相互的信赖和被分享的自动自发之间为邻近地区 (Sampson ， Raudenbush， & 伯爵， 1997)的共同美好事物干涉 ", 而且两个主要成份被包含： 在邻近地区里面的社会结合和非正式的社会控制的程度。 社会的结合包括在邻居之中的团结、信赖和社会的连接。 比较高的邻近地区附着水平已经在有和他们的邻居的友好关系的人中被观察. （Mesch ＆庄园， 1998; Sampson ＆小树林， 1989) 非正式的社会控制包括对邻近地区的控制事件的感觉和情况，而且可能被连接到已经被建立理论提供安全感、身份和控制给个体的邻近地区附着。（Proshansky 等人， 1983; 装配， LeBailly， & 戈登， 1981)