Question

英语翻译，请帮忙，急~~

周一要做一个PpT介绍，可是英语不怎么好，想请大家帮忙翻译一下~拜托了~

1，大家好~我是&*&，下面由我来介绍——和——部分。
2，首先让我们来先看看——部分、
3.这个部分分为五条，第一条是。。。。
4.但是，64岁一下的disabled old people除外，这种情况下，受益者大大缩小，“只有一部分人受益，却需要全民负担保险费”的问题被提出来了。所以，以后制度方向需要重新设定。
5，本人负责20%，这比日本的￥￥￥保险本人负担10%和德国只负责食宿费相比大多了.
6,满足不了老人服务的多样化，没有有效地质量评价和管理方案。
7.下面来介绍）））部分，根据上面的问题点，提出以下改善方案，
8.以上是我的发表，

Answer 1

1 hello ~ I am & * & below, let me introduce - and - part.
2, first let us see first part, -
3. This section is divided into five, the first is...
4. But, 64, once of harbor it except the competition, this kind of circumstance, beneficiaries dramatically narrow, "only one part person benefit, but it takes a national burden premium" questions are carried out. So, later institutional directions reset the.
Five, I was responsible for 20%, this than Japan's $xx insurance him burden 10% and Germany responsible only for accommodation costs compared mostly.
Six, can't satisfy the elderly service diversity, no effective quality evaluation and management plan.
7. To introduce below), according to the above) part points, put forward the following improvements,
8. Above is my published
翻译如上，望采纳！

Answer 2

1. Good morning / good afternoon everyone. I am &*&, and I will be introducing ___ and ___ parts of this presentation.
2. First, let us look at ___.
3. This part can be categorized into five sub sections. The first is..
4. However, disabled people under 64 are excluded. This greatly reduce eligible beneficiaries. The challenge of "Everyone has to pay for a program where only some people can benefit" is raised. This requires new thinking on policy direction.
5. Individual has to pay 20%. This is a lot more than Japan's YYY insurance with 10% rate, and with Germany where individuals only have to pay for room and board.
6. This cannot satisfy the diverse requirement of senior care, and there is no effective quality measurement or management policy.
7. Please allow me to introduce the following section. Looking at the issues that were raised previously, I will suggest the following improvement.
8. This is my presentation.

Answer 3

1. Hello everybody, I'm &*& Today I'll introduce _ part and _ part.
2. First, let's look at the _ part.
3. We divided this part into five and the first is ...
4. Except the disabled old people under 64. In this situation, the beneficiaries dramatically decrease. The question of 'only a part of people can be benefited while the whole people should bear the expenses of insurance' has been raised up. Therefore, the direction of regulations need to be reset later.
5. I'm responsible for 20 per cent. It's much larger than the 10 per cent shouldered by the Japanese ￥￥￥ insurance and the accommodation expenses shouldered by Germany.
6. It cannot satisfied the diversity of old people service, also no effective quality evaluation and management plan.
7. Then goes the _ part. According to the question points above, we give these suggestions for improvement.
8. That's all. Thanks for your listening.

Answer 4

1Hello ~ I am & * & below, let me introduce - and - part.
2First let us see first part, -
3This section is divided into five, the first is...
4But, 64, once of harbor it except the competition, this kind of circumstance, beneficiaries dramatically narrow, "only one part person benefit, but it takes a national burden premium" questions are carried out. So, later institutional directions reset the.
5I was responsible for 20%, this than Japan's $xx insurance him burden 10% and Germany responsible only for accommodation costs compared mostly.
6Can't satisfy the elderly service diversity, no effective quality evaluation and management plan.