求高手翻译英语论文
ThefirstreportoftheRCEPwasanevalua-tionofpollutionproblems,andlistedanumberofpr...
The first report of the RCEP was an evalua-
tion of pollution problems, and listed a
number of priorities for investigation. These
priorities included estuarine pollution and
radioactivity, which were later to be the sub-
ject of reports in their own right. Altogether
there have been 18 reports, listed in the
Appendix. Some of them, such as the First
Report[2], mentioned above, and the Fourth
Report[4], which looked at “progress and
problems of pollution control”, have been
general in nature. Others have dealt with
specific substances, such as lead[5] and oil[6],
or targeted sectors such as agriculture[7] or
nuclear power[8].
When the RCEP was still young, it was
suggested that it had two main functions. The
first was to be slightly distant from the White-
hall bureaucracy in order to provide indepen-
dent assessment of pollution problems and
policies. The second was to try to develop an
innovative approach and move away from
policy which merely reacted to apparent
problems[1, p. 91]. The Sixteenth Report by the
RCEP suggests that these parallel functions
remain the basis of its work. Current river
policy is implicitly criticized insofar as it is
noted that there has been “… a net deteriora-
tion over the past decade in contrast to the
improvements recorded over the 20 years up
to 1980”[9, p. 176].
Existing government policy is questioned
as the RCEP recommends:
…that the Government consider with local
and public health authorities whether ade-
quate monitoring of private boreholes,
springs and wells is being carried out and
adequate advice offered to users[9, p. 178].
Policy recommendations such as the protec-
tion of groundwater through contaminated
land clean-up suggest priorities for govern-
ment. In addition to such direct policy refer-
ences, there are also more more general, long-
term statements which call for sustainability,
for a precautionary approach and for the
improved monitoring which would make
these possible:
Future generations should have access to
water resources which will allow them no
less, and preferably a greater, range of
options than are enjoyed today[9, p. 176].
Again on principles, the RCEP devoted its
entire Twelfth Report to the concept of “best
practicable environmental option”. As was
pointed out in the conclusions, this was a
shift from practice hitherto:
This report is different; it is concerned with
the principles and practice of pollution
control in general[10].
Having said that this report marked a change
in emphasis it should be pointed out that
principles and ideas had been expounded in
previous reports. The report on waste man-
agement, for example, implicitly advocated
precaution in the following instance:
求人工翻译 展开
tion of pollution problems, and listed a
number of priorities for investigation. These
priorities included estuarine pollution and
radioactivity, which were later to be the sub-
ject of reports in their own right. Altogether
there have been 18 reports, listed in the
Appendix. Some of them, such as the First
Report[2], mentioned above, and the Fourth
Report[4], which looked at “progress and
problems of pollution control”, have been
general in nature. Others have dealt with
specific substances, such as lead[5] and oil[6],
or targeted sectors such as agriculture[7] or
nuclear power[8].
When the RCEP was still young, it was
suggested that it had two main functions. The
first was to be slightly distant from the White-
hall bureaucracy in order to provide indepen-
dent assessment of pollution problems and
policies. The second was to try to develop an
innovative approach and move away from
policy which merely reacted to apparent
problems[1, p. 91]. The Sixteenth Report by the
RCEP suggests that these parallel functions
remain the basis of its work. Current river
policy is implicitly criticized insofar as it is
noted that there has been “… a net deteriora-
tion over the past decade in contrast to the
improvements recorded over the 20 years up
to 1980”[9, p. 176].
Existing government policy is questioned
as the RCEP recommends:
…that the Government consider with local
and public health authorities whether ade-
quate monitoring of private boreholes,
springs and wells is being carried out and
adequate advice offered to users[9, p. 178].
Policy recommendations such as the protec-
tion of groundwater through contaminated
land clean-up suggest priorities for govern-
ment. In addition to such direct policy refer-
ences, there are also more more general, long-
term statements which call for sustainability,
for a precautionary approach and for the
improved monitoring which would make
these possible:
Future generations should have access to
water resources which will allow them no
less, and preferably a greater, range of
options than are enjoyed today[9, p. 176].
Again on principles, the RCEP devoted its
entire Twelfth Report to the concept of “best
practicable environmental option”. As was
pointed out in the conclusions, this was a
shift from practice hitherto:
This report is different; it is concerned with
the principles and practice of pollution
control in general[10].
Having said that this report marked a change
in emphasis it should be pointed out that
principles and ideas had been expounded in
previous reports. The report on waste man-
agement, for example, implicitly advocated
precaution in the following instance:
求人工翻译 展开
展开全部
RCEP的第一份报告,是一种evalua -
实践,并列举了环境污染等问题
许多重点进行调查。这些
重点包括河口污染和
后来放射性的子-
对象的报告在他们自己的权力。完全
有18报告,列入
附录。他们中的一些人,如第一
报告[2]的基础上,上面所提及的,和第四节
报告[4]观察“进步
控制”、污染问题
一般的性质。别人处理
特定的物质,如铅[5]和油[6],
农业等行业的或有[7]
核能[8]。
当RCEP还年轻的时候,它是什么吗
表明它有两个主要职能。这
一是稍远的白色-
大厅官僚主义为了提供indepen -
凹痕污染问题的评估
政策。第2种是努力发展
创新的方法和离开
政策,它只对明显
问题[1]p。91]。第十六届报告
RCEP表明这些平行的功能
保持的基础工作。电流河
政策被隐含的批评在它
指出,有“…净deteriora -
在过去十年中操纵与
20多年来进行了改进
到1980年”[9,p。176]。
现有的政府政策质疑
为RCEP推荐:
政府…考虑当地的市场
和公共卫生当局由于是否-
quate监测的私人钻井,
泉水和井水正在执行
足够的建议提供给用户[9,p。178]。
政策建议如布鲁泰克-
通过被污染的地下水实践
清理土地管理的优先顺序建议-
品德。另外,此类直接政策参考-
ences,还有更多的更一般的,长-
学期报告呼吁可持续性,
为和预防性措施
这将使提升监测
这些可能的:
应该有机会接受未来几代人
将使他们水资源
少的,最好是更大的,射程
选择比享受今天[9,p。176]。
再在原则,致力于RCEP
整个12报告最好”的概念
可行的环境选择。”是
结论指出,这是一个巨大的成功
从实践中转移到如今:
这份报告是不同的;它是关心的问题
的原理和实践的污染
一般[10]所控制。
我已经说过这份报告标志着一个变化
对重点应该指出
原理与想法,论述了
先前的报道。报告有关废物的人——
管理,例如,隐式提倡
预防在接下来的如:
插入图片插入地图
实践,并列举了环境污染等问题
许多重点进行调查。这些
重点包括河口污染和
后来放射性的子-
对象的报告在他们自己的权力。完全
有18报告,列入
附录。他们中的一些人,如第一
报告[2]的基础上,上面所提及的,和第四节
报告[4]观察“进步
控制”、污染问题
一般的性质。别人处理
特定的物质,如铅[5]和油[6],
农业等行业的或有[7]
核能[8]。
当RCEP还年轻的时候,它是什么吗
表明它有两个主要职能。这
一是稍远的白色-
大厅官僚主义为了提供indepen -
凹痕污染问题的评估
政策。第2种是努力发展
创新的方法和离开
政策,它只对明显
问题[1]p。91]。第十六届报告
RCEP表明这些平行的功能
保持的基础工作。电流河
政策被隐含的批评在它
指出,有“…净deteriora -
在过去十年中操纵与
20多年来进行了改进
到1980年”[9,p。176]。
现有的政府政策质疑
为RCEP推荐:
政府…考虑当地的市场
和公共卫生当局由于是否-
quate监测的私人钻井,
泉水和井水正在执行
足够的建议提供给用户[9,p。178]。
政策建议如布鲁泰克-
通过被污染的地下水实践
清理土地管理的优先顺序建议-
品德。另外,此类直接政策参考-
ences,还有更多的更一般的,长-
学期报告呼吁可持续性,
为和预防性措施
这将使提升监测
这些可能的:
应该有机会接受未来几代人
将使他们水资源
少的,最好是更大的,射程
选择比享受今天[9,p。176]。
再在原则,致力于RCEP
整个12报告最好”的概念
可行的环境选择。”是
结论指出,这是一个巨大的成功
从实践中转移到如今:
这份报告是不同的;它是关心的问题
的原理和实践的污染
一般[10]所控制。
我已经说过这份报告标志着一个变化
对重点应该指出
原理与想法,论述了
先前的报道。报告有关废物的人——
管理,例如,隐式提倡
预防在接下来的如:
插入图片插入地图
展开全部
RCEP的第一份报告,是一种evalua -
实践,并列举了环境污染等问题
许多重点进行调查。这些
重点包括河口污染和
后来放射性的子-
对象的报告在他们自己的权力。完全
有18报告,列入
附录。他们中的一些人,如第一
报告[2]的基础上,上面所提及的,和第四节
报告[4]观察“进步
控制”、污染问题
一般的性质。不
当RCEP还年轻的时候,它是什么吗
表明它有两个主要职能。这
一是稍远的白色-
大厅官僚主义为了提供indepen -
凹痕污染问题的评估
政策。第2种是努力发展
创新的方法和离开
政策,它只对明显
问题[1]p。91]。第十六届报告
RCEP表明这些平行的功能
保持的基础工作。电流河
政策是implici
政府…考虑当地的市场
和公共卫生当局由于是否-
quate监测的私人钻井,
泉水和井水正在执行
足够的建议提供给用户[9,p。178]。
政策建议如布鲁泰克-
通过被污染的地下水实践
清理土地管理的优先顺序建议-
品德。另外,此类直接政策参考-
ences,还有更多的更一般的,长-
学期报告呼吁可持续性,
为precautionar
应该有机会接受未来几代人
将使他们水资源
少的,最好是更大的,射程
选择比享受今天[9,p。176]。
再在原则,致力于RCEP
整个12报告最好”的概念
可行的环境选择。”是
结论指出,这是一个巨大的成功
从实践中转移到如今:
这份报告是不同的;它是关心的问题
的原理和实践的污染
一般[10]所控制。
我已经说过,
实践,并列举了环境污染等问题
许多重点进行调查。这些
重点包括河口污染和
后来放射性的子-
对象的报告在他们自己的权力。完全
有18报告,列入
附录。他们中的一些人,如第一
报告[2]的基础上,上面所提及的,和第四节
报告[4]观察“进步
控制”、污染问题
一般的性质。不
当RCEP还年轻的时候,它是什么吗
表明它有两个主要职能。这
一是稍远的白色-
大厅官僚主义为了提供indepen -
凹痕污染问题的评估
政策。第2种是努力发展
创新的方法和离开
政策,它只对明显
问题[1]p。91]。第十六届报告
RCEP表明这些平行的功能
保持的基础工作。电流河
政策是implici
政府…考虑当地的市场
和公共卫生当局由于是否-
quate监测的私人钻井,
泉水和井水正在执行
足够的建议提供给用户[9,p。178]。
政策建议如布鲁泰克-
通过被污染的地下水实践
清理土地管理的优先顺序建议-
品德。另外,此类直接政策参考-
ences,还有更多的更一般的,长-
学期报告呼吁可持续性,
为precautionar
应该有机会接受未来几代人
将使他们水资源
少的,最好是更大的,射程
选择比享受今天[9,p。176]。
再在原则,致力于RCEP
整个12报告最好”的概念
可行的环境选择。”是
结论指出,这是一个巨大的成功
从实践中转移到如今:
这份报告是不同的;它是关心的问题
的原理和实践的污染
一般[10]所控制。
我已经说过,
本回答被网友采纳
已赞过
已踩过<
评论
收起
你对这个回答的评价是?
展开全部
这么长 还没分..
只能换回google翻译了...
只能换回google翻译了...
已赞过
已踩过<
评论
收起
你对这个回答的评价是?
推荐律师服务:
若未解决您的问题,请您详细描述您的问题,通过百度律临进行免费专业咨询