
法律问题!!!!急!!!!!
BobDisformitycameupontheofficeoflocalattorneysNateLawyerFirmashelookedforsomeonetorep...
Bob Disformity came upon the office of local attorneys Nate Lawyer Firm as he looked for someone to represent him in a claim of personal injury following a horrible hunting accident during bow-hunting season for deer. The window of the Nate Lawyer Firm office indicated that they specialized in personal injury claims, and had secured six-figure judgments in all such cases that they had handled. Bob talked with Nate, partner in the firm, who explained that Bob would not have to pay Nate Lawyer Firm anything unless and until they were successful in the suit; they agreed orally that there would be a contingent fee and Nate Lawyer Firm would receive 40% of the proceeds of the suit.
(Nate Lawyer Firm had worked hard to get all attorneys in their city to agree to set a 38% rate for all contingent fee personal injury cases, and had three written agreements with three other local firms that they would agree upon fee schedules on the contingent fees as requested by Nate Lawyer Firm, and other fees would be set by agreement on domestic relations and criminal cases as well. One portion of the agreement indicated that representation in the criminal matters would mandate that the potential client also agree to fees for expungement.) Nate Lawyer Firm received an offer for settlement from the defendant in the amount of $115,000.00. This offer was communicated to Bob, and Nate aggressively pushed for the rejection of the offer. Before Bob made any decision, Nate communicated to defendant’s insurance carrier that the offer was in fact, rejected.
Defendant’s attorneys indicate that no further settlement offer would be forthcoming, and as a result Nate Lawyer Firm informed Bob that they would no longer represent him in the case as they do not have the required resources to handle the litigation; Bob was never informed that the $115,000.00 settlement offer was rejected.
Following the news that Nate Lawyer Firm would no longer represent him, Bob became distraught. He was still convinced that Nate Lawyer Firm were specialists, and the only firm equipped to get him a "guaranteed" six-figure settlement.
Q1:Can Bob sue Nate Lawyer Firm for breach of contract based upon their withdraw as counsel? His complaint seeks specific performance as the remedy.
Q2:Discuss any antitrust issues implicated in the activities of Nate Lawyer Firm.
我不是要翻译,我是想请懂法律的朋友帮忙分析下…… 展开
(Nate Lawyer Firm had worked hard to get all attorneys in their city to agree to set a 38% rate for all contingent fee personal injury cases, and had three written agreements with three other local firms that they would agree upon fee schedules on the contingent fees as requested by Nate Lawyer Firm, and other fees would be set by agreement on domestic relations and criminal cases as well. One portion of the agreement indicated that representation in the criminal matters would mandate that the potential client also agree to fees for expungement.) Nate Lawyer Firm received an offer for settlement from the defendant in the amount of $115,000.00. This offer was communicated to Bob, and Nate aggressively pushed for the rejection of the offer. Before Bob made any decision, Nate communicated to defendant’s insurance carrier that the offer was in fact, rejected.
Defendant’s attorneys indicate that no further settlement offer would be forthcoming, and as a result Nate Lawyer Firm informed Bob that they would no longer represent him in the case as they do not have the required resources to handle the litigation; Bob was never informed that the $115,000.00 settlement offer was rejected.
Following the news that Nate Lawyer Firm would no longer represent him, Bob became distraught. He was still convinced that Nate Lawyer Firm were specialists, and the only firm equipped to get him a "guaranteed" six-figure settlement.
Q1:Can Bob sue Nate Lawyer Firm for breach of contract based upon their withdraw as counsel? His complaint seeks specific performance as the remedy.
Q2:Discuss any antitrust issues implicated in the activities of Nate Lawyer Firm.
我不是要翻译,我是想请懂法律的朋友帮忙分析下…… 展开
展开全部
这个提问适用哪国法律??
在中国这种反垄断可能是个问题!
英语水平有限啊!
在中国这种反垄断可能是个问题!
英语水平有限啊!
推荐律师服务:
若未解决您的问题,请您详细描述您的问题,通过百度律临进行免费专业咨询
您可能需要的服务
百度律临官方认证律师咨询
平均3分钟响应
|
问题解决率99%
|
24小时在线
立即免费咨询律师
15113人正在获得一对一解答
深圳蓝天飞翔3分钟前提交了问题
青岛梦幻岛2分钟前提交了问题
深圳蓝天飞翔3分钟前提交了问题