法律问题!!!!急!!!!!

BobDisformitycameupontheofficeoflocalattorneysNateLawyerFirmashelookedforsomeonetorep... Bob Disformity came upon the office of local attorneys Nate Lawyer Firm as he looked for someone to represent him in a claim of personal injury following a horrible hunting accident during bow-hunting season for deer. The window of the Nate Lawyer Firm office indicated that they specialized in personal injury claims, and had secured six-figure judgments in all such cases that they had handled. Bob talked with Nate, partner in the firm, who explained that Bob would not have to pay Nate Lawyer Firm anything unless and until they were successful in the suit; they agreed orally that there would be a contingent fee and Nate Lawyer Firm would receive 40% of the proceeds of the suit.
(Nate Lawyer Firm had worked hard to get all attorneys in their city to agree to set a 38% rate for all contingent fee personal injury cases, and had three written agreements with three other local firms that they would agree upon fee schedules on the contingent fees as requested by Nate Lawyer Firm, and other fees would be set by agreement on domestic relations and criminal cases as well. One portion of the agreement indicated that representation in the criminal matters would mandate that the potential client also agree to fees for expungement.) Nate Lawyer Firm received an offer for settlement from the defendant in the amount of $115,000.00. This offer was communicated to Bob, and Nate aggressively pushed for the rejection of the offer. Before Bob made any decision, Nate communicated to defendant’s insurance carrier that the offer was in fact, rejected.
Defendant’s attorneys indicate that no further settlement offer would be forthcoming, and as a result Nate Lawyer Firm informed Bob that they would no longer represent him in the case as they do not have the required resources to handle the litigation; Bob was never informed that the $115,000.00 settlement offer was rejected.
Following the news that Nate Lawyer Firm would no longer represent him, Bob became distraught. He was still convinced that Nate Lawyer Firm were specialists, and the only firm equipped to get him a "guaranteed" six-figure settlement.

Q1:Can Bob sue Nate Lawyer Firm for breach of contract based upon their withdraw as counsel? His complaint seeks specific performance as the remedy.
Q2:Discuss any antitrust issues implicated in the activities of Nate Lawyer Firm.
我不是要翻译,我是想请懂法律的朋友帮忙分析下……
展开
寻找周舟
2010-12-11 · TA获得超过495个赞
知道小有建树答主
回答量:212
采纳率:0%
帮助的人:108万
展开全部
这个提问适用哪国法律??
在中国这种反垄断可能是个问题!
英语水平有限啊!
百度网友cc79d484
2010-12-11 · TA获得超过858个赞
知道小有建树答主
回答量:703
采纳率:0%
帮助的人:557万
展开全部
百度搜索在线翻译,复制粘贴,一下就搞定了
已赞过 已踩过<
你对这个回答的评价是?
评论 收起
推荐律师服务: 若未解决您的问题,请您详细描述您的问题,通过百度律临进行免费专业咨询
您可能需要的服务
百度律临官方认证律师咨询
平均3分钟响应 | 问题解决率99% | 24小时在线
立即免费咨询律师
15113人正在获得一对一解答
深圳蓝天飞翔3分钟前提交了问题
青岛梦幻岛2分钟前提交了问题
深圳蓝天飞翔3分钟前提交了问题
下载百度知道APP,抢鲜体验
使用百度知道APP,立即抢鲜体验。你的手机镜头里或许有别人想知道的答案。
扫描二维码下载
×

类别

我们会通过消息、邮箱等方式尽快将举报结果通知您。

说明

0/200

提交
取消
还有疑问? 马上咨询34321位在线律师,3分钟快速解答
立即免费咨询律师

辅 助

模 式