谁能帮帮我翻译下,不要用英文在线翻译之类的。谢谢,跪求啊。
我个人认为哈姆莱特是一个矛盾的合体。在事件发生的时间哈姆莱特只是一个年轻人,顶多20多岁。哈姆莱特在先前对生活是充满希望,根本没有想到杀死自己亲生父亲并抢夺他母亲的就是他...
我个人认为哈姆莱特是一个矛盾的合体。
在事件发生的时间哈姆莱特只是一个年轻人,顶多20多岁。哈姆莱特在先前对生活是充满希望,根本没有想到杀死自己亲生父亲并抢夺他母亲的就是他叔叔。这是对于一个年轻人来说一很沉重的抉择——“生存还是死亡”。他对于这件事曾经深思过,如果进行谋杀、复仇,而且装疯卖傻得很像,一点都没有被人察觉,说明他捉摸人心挺准,又稠密计划,这是心细的表现。又想通过戏剧来揭穿事实的真相,以便于自己有证据。对于杀父仇人、篡位,报仇的确是有根据的。但为什么却给人的感觉优柔寡断呢?
我认为哈姆雷特是一个思想上的哲人,他的思考都有关哲学命题。他的关于人生价值和作为人的思考是深邃而成熟的,我不认为他是忧郁而优柔寡断的。他只是在思考,思考做这件事的意义和合理性。他要等考虑成熟后再行动,而不会贸然行事。他尊崇人的理智、高贵、正义等一切美好的东西。当他发现现实并不美好时,虽然他也有过怀疑,但他最终的思考结果是接受。
“生存还是毁灭,这是一个值得思考的问题”这是哈姆雷特深深思考过的问题。但他最终摆脱了,思考也成熟了,于是坚定了复仇的决心。
他勇敢机智,当他识破叔叔要将他致死的阴谋后,立刻改写了一封信让出卖他的“朋友”得到了惩罚,而他却安然地回来了。这足以体现他的果敢。
当他听到鬼魂的诉说后,并没有立即行动不能说明他是优柔寡断的,相反,这正体现了他的理智。因为他如果在事实没有得到证实之前就行动,就表明他过于轻信。但是他想到演戏剧来验证,正体现了他的聪明。 展开
在事件发生的时间哈姆莱特只是一个年轻人,顶多20多岁。哈姆莱特在先前对生活是充满希望,根本没有想到杀死自己亲生父亲并抢夺他母亲的就是他叔叔。这是对于一个年轻人来说一很沉重的抉择——“生存还是死亡”。他对于这件事曾经深思过,如果进行谋杀、复仇,而且装疯卖傻得很像,一点都没有被人察觉,说明他捉摸人心挺准,又稠密计划,这是心细的表现。又想通过戏剧来揭穿事实的真相,以便于自己有证据。对于杀父仇人、篡位,报仇的确是有根据的。但为什么却给人的感觉优柔寡断呢?
我认为哈姆雷特是一个思想上的哲人,他的思考都有关哲学命题。他的关于人生价值和作为人的思考是深邃而成熟的,我不认为他是忧郁而优柔寡断的。他只是在思考,思考做这件事的意义和合理性。他要等考虑成熟后再行动,而不会贸然行事。他尊崇人的理智、高贵、正义等一切美好的东西。当他发现现实并不美好时,虽然他也有过怀疑,但他最终的思考结果是接受。
“生存还是毁灭,这是一个值得思考的问题”这是哈姆雷特深深思考过的问题。但他最终摆脱了,思考也成熟了,于是坚定了复仇的决心。
他勇敢机智,当他识破叔叔要将他致死的阴谋后,立刻改写了一封信让出卖他的“朋友”得到了惩罚,而他却安然地回来了。这足以体现他的果敢。
当他听到鬼魂的诉说后,并没有立即行动不能说明他是优柔寡断的,相反,这正体现了他的理智。因为他如果在事实没有得到证实之前就行动,就表明他过于轻信。但是他想到演戏剧来验证,正体现了他的聪明。 展开
展开全部
I personally think Hamlet is a contradiction rolled into one.
In the event of time Hamlet just a young man, at most early 20s. Hamlet in previous to life is full of hope, it never occurred to kill their biological father and robbed his mother is his uncle. This is for a young person to a very heavy choices - "life and death". His description of the event ever thinking, and if it for killing, vengeance, and fool on occasion alike, had a bit of being noticed that his heart quite accurate, elusive and dense plan, this is the talk of performance. Think again through the drama to expose the truth, in order to oneself have evidence. For killed father an enemy, earthling thone vengeance is indeed motivated. But why is the sense that gives a person is indecision?
I think Hamlet is an ideological philosopher, and his thinking was about the philosophical proposition. He's about life value and as a person's thinking is abstruse and mature, I don't think he was somber and indecisive. He just thinking, thinking about doing this meaning and rationality. He will wait considered mature again after the action, not rashly. He exalted person's reason, noble, justice and all good things. When he found out that reality is not good, although he had doubts, but eventually he thinking results are acceptable.
"To be or not to be, that is a question" is this Hamlet deeply thinking problem. But he finally got rid, thinking, mature, hence established the determination.
His brave wit, when he wised uncle will make his deadly conspiracy, immediately rewriting a letter to betray his friends get punished, while he comfortably in the back. It is enough to reflect his manly character.
When he heard the ghost of telling, didn't immediately action can not shows that he is indecisive, instead, it reflects the his reason. Because if he is in fact no confirmed before they act, it shows he is too credulity. But he thought of playing drama to verify, and reflected his clever.
In the event of time Hamlet just a young man, at most early 20s. Hamlet in previous to life is full of hope, it never occurred to kill their biological father and robbed his mother is his uncle. This is for a young person to a very heavy choices - "life and death". His description of the event ever thinking, and if it for killing, vengeance, and fool on occasion alike, had a bit of being noticed that his heart quite accurate, elusive and dense plan, this is the talk of performance. Think again through the drama to expose the truth, in order to oneself have evidence. For killed father an enemy, earthling thone vengeance is indeed motivated. But why is the sense that gives a person is indecision?
I think Hamlet is an ideological philosopher, and his thinking was about the philosophical proposition. He's about life value and as a person's thinking is abstruse and mature, I don't think he was somber and indecisive. He just thinking, thinking about doing this meaning and rationality. He will wait considered mature again after the action, not rashly. He exalted person's reason, noble, justice and all good things. When he found out that reality is not good, although he had doubts, but eventually he thinking results are acceptable.
"To be or not to be, that is a question" is this Hamlet deeply thinking problem. But he finally got rid, thinking, mature, hence established the determination.
His brave wit, when he wised uncle will make his deadly conspiracy, immediately rewriting a letter to betray his friends get punished, while he comfortably in the back. It is enough to reflect his manly character.
When he heard the ghost of telling, didn't immediately action can not shows that he is indecisive, instead, it reflects the his reason. Because if he is in fact no confirmed before they act, it shows he is too credulity. But he thought of playing drama to verify, and reflected his clever.
展开全部
I personally think that Hamlet is a contradiction of fitness.
At the time of the event is a hamlet only young people, at most 20-year-old. Hamlet in a previous life is full of hope, no thought to kill his own father and snatch his mother was his uncle. This is for a young man, a very heavy burden of choice — "to be or not." He had thought about it, if you murder, revenge, and screaming insanity is like, without being aware that he imagined the people very prospective and dense, it is somebody's performance. Want to expose through theatre to the truth, so that their own evidence. For father's enemy, was deposed, revenge is indeed. But why do people feel indecisive?
I think that Hamlet is an ideological considerations of the philosopher, he is the philosophical propositions. He's on the value of life and as a person's thinking is deep and mature, I don't think he is sad and indecision. He's just thinking, thinking it's significance and rationality. He has to wait for further action after mature consideration, not rush. He respected human reason, noble, justice, etc. everything good. When he found that reality is not good, although he also had doubts, but he eventually of the result is acceptable.
"To be or not to be, that is a question worth considering" this is a hamlet deep thought about the problem. But he finally shaken off, thinking also mature and strengthened the resolve of revenge.
His brave wit, when he saw through his uncle's death, immediately after overwriting a letter to betray his "friends" get punished, but he managed to come back. This is enough to embody his bold.
When he heard the telling of ghost, and no immediate action is not able to explain his indecision, on the contrary, it reflects his reason. Because if he did not in fact be confirmed prior to the action, indicated his credulity. But he thought playing drama to verify that reflects his clever.
At the time of the event is a hamlet only young people, at most 20-year-old. Hamlet in a previous life is full of hope, no thought to kill his own father and snatch his mother was his uncle. This is for a young man, a very heavy burden of choice — "to be or not." He had thought about it, if you murder, revenge, and screaming insanity is like, without being aware that he imagined the people very prospective and dense, it is somebody's performance. Want to expose through theatre to the truth, so that their own evidence. For father's enemy, was deposed, revenge is indeed. But why do people feel indecisive?
I think that Hamlet is an ideological considerations of the philosopher, he is the philosophical propositions. He's on the value of life and as a person's thinking is deep and mature, I don't think he is sad and indecision. He's just thinking, thinking it's significance and rationality. He has to wait for further action after mature consideration, not rush. He respected human reason, noble, justice, etc. everything good. When he found that reality is not good, although he also had doubts, but he eventually of the result is acceptable.
"To be or not to be, that is a question worth considering" this is a hamlet deep thought about the problem. But he finally shaken off, thinking also mature and strengthened the resolve of revenge.
His brave wit, when he saw through his uncle's death, immediately after overwriting a letter to betray his "friends" get punished, but he managed to come back. This is enough to embody his bold.
When he heard the telling of ghost, and no immediate action is not able to explain his indecision, on the contrary, it reflects his reason. Because if he did not in fact be confirmed prior to the action, indicated his credulity. But he thought playing drama to verify that reflects his clever.
已赞过
已踩过<
评论
收起
你对这个回答的评价是?
推荐律师服务:
若未解决您的问题,请您详细描述您的问题,通过百度律临进行免费专业咨询