Question

帮忙翻译下面一段英文，谢谢！

Somehow, we must begin by correlating sentences with world affairs, correspondence of words with things coming after. The articulation of the sentence into elements that are supposed to correspond must result from this analysis rather than being the basis of it—and so with the articulation of the world affair that the sentence maps.

How Intentional Icons Map onto the World

What I will describe is the correspondence relation between an indicative intentional icon and its real value. Description of the correspondence relation for imperative intentional icons is exactly parallel.
When an indicative intentional icon has a real value, it is related to that real value as follows: (1) The real value is a Normal condition for performance of the icon's direct proper functions. (2) There are operations upon or transformations (in the mathematical sense) of the icon that correspond one-to-one to operations upon or transformations of the real value such that (3) any transform of the icon resulting from one of these operations has as a Normal condition for proper performance the corresponding transform of the real value.

The governing idea here is that, in the first instance at least, it is transformations of the icon that correspond to transformations of the real value—operations upon the icon that correspond to operations upon the real value—not elements of the icon that correspond to elements of the real value.

Whatever is considered as subject to a set of transformations is as such "articulate" in a certain way. It is not articulated into parts but into invariant and variant aspects. What remains unchanged under all transformations in a transformation set is the invariant aspect of a thing relative to that set; what changes under these transformations are variant aspects. If it is transformations of an intentional icon that correspond to transformations of its real value, thus yielding correspondence between icons and world affairs, an intentional icon is always "articulate" in the above sense, and so is the affair to which it corresponds. But neither the articulation of the icon nor of the affair is an articulation into parts. Neither the icon nor the iconed is originally articulated as a configuration or concatenation of objects or of elements and relations.

In the case of bee dances, transformations of the dance (say, increase the number of loops by one, rotate the angle of the axis of the figure eight 20º clockwise) correspond to transformations of the sun-hive-nectar relation that is mapped. I do not know what is invariant in the bee dance. But invariant in the real value is the relata of the relation mapped—sun, hive, nectar. For example, there is no transformation of the bee dance that corresponds to replacing the sun with the moon such that the resulting dance maps the relation of moon, hive, and nectar.

Answer 1

不管怎样，我们必须首先与世界事务中相互关联的句子，与未来的事情后对应词。到那个应该对应，而不是-等与世界地图的事说了一句衔接在此基础上，必须从这样的分析结果元素衔接的句子。

我将描述是故意之间的指示图标，其真正的价值对应关系。故意为必要的图标对应关系的描述是完全平行。
当指示故意图标有一个真正的价值，这是与真正的价值如下：（1）真正的价值是一个图标的直接正确履行职能正常状态。 （2）有或变换操作时的图标（在数学意义上的），对应一至一到操作时的实际价值或转换，使（3）任何从这些图标变换操作之一造成作为一个拥有适当履行正常状态的相应变换的真正价值。

理事这里的想法是，在第一时间至少，这是对应的图标后，图标对应的图标后，真正的价值而不是分子行动的真正价值的操作转换到对应的转换要素的实际价值。

无论是作为主体的变换集的一个考虑的是如“阐明”以某种方式。这不是地接合部分，但不变的，变到方方面面。剩下的下一个转换设置的所有变换不变是相对的事情不变的方面来设定，根据这些变化是什么样的变化变种方面。如果是有意的图标对应其真正的价值转换，从而产生的图标和世界事务之间的通信，故意图标始终是“阐明”在上述意义上说，这一事件也是如此转换，它相对应。但是，无论是图标的衔接，也没有对此事的衔接是一个分成几部分。无论是图标还是iconed原来的战略是配置或对象或元素和关系串连。

在蜜蜂舞蹈时，舞蹈的转换（例如，增加一个的循环数，旋转的图形的8个20度的夹角顺时针）对应于太阳蜂房-花蜜的关系，对应的转换。我不知道什么是在蜂舞不变。但在实际价值不变是这种关系的映射，太阳，蜂房，花蜜relata。例如，有没有对应的蜜蜂舞蹈取代太阳与月亮的转变，这样生成的舞蹈绘制了月球，蜂房，和花蜜的关系。

Answer 2

翻译为
在某种程度上,我们必须开始用相关的句子相符的国际事务中文字的东西来。把这句子发音的元素,都应该从这些分析结果必须一致而不是服务的基础上与世界事务,发音标准,一句话的地图。

如何有意的图标集映射到世界

我将描述就是对应关系故意一个指示图标,其真正的价值。描述的对应关系的故意》就必须完全平行。
当一个象征故意图标有一个真正的价值,它涉及到真正的价值为:(1)的真正价值是一种正常的条件的图标的性能直接适当的功能。(2)有操作(在转变数学意义)相对应的图标一对一的营运在变革的真正价值,(3)图标的转变对这些操作一种由贪婪导致的行为已经作为一个正常条件对应的正确实施的转变的实际价值。
在这里,执政理念的起初至少,这是变革的图标流动相对应的真正value-operations对应的图标上在真正的value-not操作的图标的元素的元素对应的实际价值。

无论被认为是必须遵照一套转变是“表达”在某种程度上。它不是挂接成几部分的而是不变集和不同的方面。在所有不变什么转变的变化,是不变的方面相对于一件事;什么变化在这些转变是不同的方面。如果是有意的转换的图标的转换与它的真正价值高,具有之间的对应图标和世界事务,故意图标总是