![](https://iknow-base.cdn.bcebos.com/lxb/notice.png)
请各位英语高手帮帮忙~~翻译一下下面这段外文!!急急~~! 5
Fifty-sixpercentoftheclaimsreceivedcompensation,atanaverageof$485,348(median,$206,400...
Fifty-six percent of the claims received compensation, at an average of $485,348 (median, $206,400) per paid claim. Fifteen percent of the claims were decided by trial verdict. The awards in verdicts for the plaintiff on average were nearly twice the size of payments made outside of court ($799,365 vs. $462,099). However, plaintiffs rarely won damages at trial, prevailing in only 21 percent of verdicts as compared with 61 percent of claims resolved out of court. Administrative (or overhead) costs associated with defending the claims averaged $52,521 per claim, with the mean administrative costs for claims that were resolved by trial ($112,968) nearly three times those for claims resolved out of court ($42,015).
Relationship between Error and Compensation
Sixty-three percent of the injuries were judged to be the result of error (Figure 1). Most claims involving injuries due to error received compensation (653 of 889 ), and most claims that did not involve errors (370 of 515 ) or injuries (31 of 37 ) did not. Overall, 73 percent (1054 of 1441) of all claims for which determinations of merit were made had outcomes concordant with their merit. Discordant outcomes in the remaining 27 percent of claims consisted of three types: payment in the absence of documented injury (6 of 1441 ), payment in the absence of error (10 percent), and no payment in the presence of error (16 percent). Thus, nonpayment of claims with merit occurred more frequently than did payment of claims that were not associated with errors or injuries. All results hereafter relate to the subsample of 1404 claims that involved injuries and for which determinations of error were made.
Figure 1. Overview of the Relationship among Claims, Injuries, Errors, and Outcomes of Litigation.
For claims classified as involving dignitary injury only, a breach of informed consent was the only injury alleged in the claim. Five of these claims resulted in payment.
Confidence in Judgments Regarding Error
Reviewers had a high level of confidence in the determination of error in 44 percent of claims (those receiving scores of 1 or 6) and a moderate level of confidence in 30 percent (those receiving scores of 2 or 5); the remaining 23 percent were deemed "close calls" (Figure 2). More than half the claims that were classified as not involving error had little or no evidence of error. The probability of payment increased monotonically with reviewers' confidence that an error had occurred.
Figure 2. Determinations of Error According to Confidence Level and Payment Status.
The 1404 claims exclude the 9 that were associated with dignitary injuries only, the 37 with no injuries, and the 2 for which no judgments regarding error were made. 展开
Relationship between Error and Compensation
Sixty-three percent of the injuries were judged to be the result of error (Figure 1). Most claims involving injuries due to error received compensation (653 of 889 ), and most claims that did not involve errors (370 of 515 ) or injuries (31 of 37 ) did not. Overall, 73 percent (1054 of 1441) of all claims for which determinations of merit were made had outcomes concordant with their merit. Discordant outcomes in the remaining 27 percent of claims consisted of three types: payment in the absence of documented injury (6 of 1441 ), payment in the absence of error (10 percent), and no payment in the presence of error (16 percent). Thus, nonpayment of claims with merit occurred more frequently than did payment of claims that were not associated with errors or injuries. All results hereafter relate to the subsample of 1404 claims that involved injuries and for which determinations of error were made.
Figure 1. Overview of the Relationship among Claims, Injuries, Errors, and Outcomes of Litigation.
For claims classified as involving dignitary injury only, a breach of informed consent was the only injury alleged in the claim. Five of these claims resulted in payment.
Confidence in Judgments Regarding Error
Reviewers had a high level of confidence in the determination of error in 44 percent of claims (those receiving scores of 1 or 6) and a moderate level of confidence in 30 percent (those receiving scores of 2 or 5); the remaining 23 percent were deemed "close calls" (Figure 2). More than half the claims that were classified as not involving error had little or no evidence of error. The probability of payment increased monotonically with reviewers' confidence that an error had occurred.
Figure 2. Determinations of Error According to Confidence Level and Payment Status.
The 1404 claims exclude the 9 that were associated with dignitary injuries only, the 37 with no injuries, and the 2 for which no judgments regarding error were made. 展开
展开全部
译文
其中56%的请求得到补偿,平均(中位数为485,348美元每206,400美元,支付索赔。百分之十五的声明是审判决定裁决。奖项的平均有利于原告的判决,几乎是大小的两倍,支付之外的799,365美元法院462,099与美元)。然而,很少赢得了赔偿原告的试验中,盛行于裁决仅有21%的人相比,61%的要求不诉诸法院解决。行政(或投影片上)的相关成本平均是$ 52,521保卫声称的平均每提出索赔要求行政成本,解决了试验(美元)112,968近3倍的索赔要求法院解决42,015美元)。
误差之间的关系和补偿
伤病中有63%的人错误的结果为(图1)。大多数声称涉及损害由于错误收到的653补偿(889例),大多数声称并没有让错误(370 515)或损伤(31日37)没有。总的来说,73%的曲目的(1054所有索赔的优点的测定结果与他们有了和谐的优点。不协调的结果在余下的27%的索赔,主要包括三种类型:付款记录在案的损伤没有6),付款推动没有错误(10%),并没有付款的存在错误(16%)。因此,欠交广告费情况下的价值发生频率较债权比支付声称并没有联系与错误或受伤而致死。所有的结果以后与subsample 1404声称涉及的伤病或错误的决定。
图1。整体的要求之间的关系,伤病,错误,以及效果诉讼。
为索赔要求只涉及特权受伤违反知情同意所谓是唯一一个在比赛中受伤的索赔。这五个声称导致了付款。
关于对判断错误
评论家
其中56%的请求得到补偿,平均(中位数为485,348美元每206,400美元,支付索赔。百分之十五的声明是审判决定裁决。奖项的平均有利于原告的判决,几乎是大小的两倍,支付之外的799,365美元法院462,099与美元)。然而,很少赢得了赔偿原告的试验中,盛行于裁决仅有21%的人相比,61%的要求不诉诸法院解决。行政(或投影片上)的相关成本平均是$ 52,521保卫声称的平均每提出索赔要求行政成本,解决了试验(美元)112,968近3倍的索赔要求法院解决42,015美元)。
误差之间的关系和补偿
伤病中有63%的人错误的结果为(图1)。大多数声称涉及损害由于错误收到的653补偿(889例),大多数声称并没有让错误(370 515)或损伤(31日37)没有。总的来说,73%的曲目的(1054所有索赔的优点的测定结果与他们有了和谐的优点。不协调的结果在余下的27%的索赔,主要包括三种类型:付款记录在案的损伤没有6),付款推动没有错误(10%),并没有付款的存在错误(16%)。因此,欠交广告费情况下的价值发生频率较债权比支付声称并没有联系与错误或受伤而致死。所有的结果以后与subsample 1404声称涉及的伤病或错误的决定。
图1。整体的要求之间的关系,伤病,错误,以及效果诉讼。
为索赔要求只涉及特权受伤违反知情同意所谓是唯一一个在比赛中受伤的索赔。这五个声称导致了付款。
关于对判断错误
评论家
推荐律师服务:
若未解决您的问题,请您详细描述您的问题,通过百度律临进行免费专业咨询