Question

跪求好心人翻译

One finds a similar schizophrenic mindset if one attempts to evaluate the views of the average American about questions related to civil rights and liberties. Public opinion researchers have consistently found that respondents to surveys overwhelmingly assert that they are strong supporters of freedom of speech and of the press, as long as one is speaking in generalities. Move to specific circumstances, however, and that support will quickly dissipate.
In short, the views of the average American citizen about a host of important questions regarding the appropriate role of government, from both a positive and negative perspective, display what can only charitably be called a conspicuous lack of consistency and sophistication. In this context, positive refers to questions germane to what is the proper role of government in establishing and carrying out policies designed to further the common good and the public interest. Negative refers to formalized limitations on governmental power, such as protecting individual citizens from governmental intrusion into areas involving freedom of speech, press, and religion.

Answer 1

当人们尝试去评价普通美国人对民权和自由相关问题的观点时，会发现他们类似精神分裂症的心态。民意研究人员在调查中发现绝大多数受访者声称他们是言论自由和新闻自由的坚定支持者。
但是，涉及到具体客观环境时，他们就不支持了。
总之，当谈及普通美国公民对于政府在重要问题中的所充当角色的看法时，存在肯定的和否定的两方面观点。显示出他们明显的缺乏坚定的立场和教养。在这种环境下，肯定是指对政府在建立和实施旨在促进共同利益和公众利益的政策时所承担的恰当角色。否定是指应采取一定的方式限制政府权力，如在保护公民言论自由，新闻自由，宗教信仰等方面不受政府干扰。

翻译完了，可能不是太好，仅供参考吧。