Question

跪求翻译啊~~~

质疑证人的可信性
所谓证人，广义上是因为自己对于犯罪有亲身之请，并且据有对事实的映像能准确的接收、存储和回忆的能力的人。在受到法院、辩方、控方的传唤后，证人有义务上庭作证。但证人言也不可尽信，法庭上的任何一方都能质疑证人的可信性。主要可以从以下几个方面入手质疑：
首先是关于证人的品格和行为证据。一般出于攻击证人可信性时，不能作为质疑根据，但如果法官自由裁量认为可以的除外。如你发现此证人并不诚实的时候，可以质疑其可信性。
其次是对于曾经定过罪的证人。如果其罪涉及不诚实罪，如：诈骗、伪证，则可作为质疑根据；而对于被告以外的证人，只有被判过死刑或一年以上刑罚的罪才能作为质疑根据。从时间上来讲，一般只有十年以内的犯罪可以用来质疑证人的可信性。超出十年的，由法官裁判是否能质疑，一经同意则需提议方足够提前地用书面通知告诉对方，以示公平。 对于赦免、撤销、复权证书的效力。如果原来犯过罪的，但复权后没有再犯过死刑或一年以上刑罚的罪的，则不能用先前的罪质疑可信性；如果一开始就是清白的，错判后被赦免、撤销则不能质疑可信性。 对于在青少年时期的犯罪证据一般是不能用来作为质疑根据的。但在刑事案件中的一位已满18周岁的非被告人证人的关键性证言也是可以成为质疑证据的。 对于上诉未决的质疑证据是可用的，但证人的宗教信仰是无法削弱和增强证人证言的可信性的。
综上所述，质疑证人可信性是十分复杂的，不可单一而论，只有细分才能体现出证据法的严谨和公正。
质疑证人可信性：impeachment of the witness'credibility

Answer 1

Questioned the credibility of witnesses
The so-called witnesses, because of his broad person's request for the crime, and in possession of the facts can accurately image the reception, storage and recall capacity. In response to a court, the defense, the prosecution called, the issuer is obligated to testify in court. However, the witness statement must not believe everything, the court can be challenged by any party on the credibility of witnesses. Main aspects can be questioned from the following:
First is the evidence of the witness's character and behavior. For attack the credibility of witnesses generally, it can not as a challenge basis, but if the judge's discretion that can be excluded. If you find that this witness is not honest, they can question their credibility.
Followed by the crime for a witness had been given. If the severity of the offense involving dishonesty crimes, such as: fraud, perjury, may act as a challenge basis; and for a witness other than the defendant, and only through death or sentenced to more than one year sentence for the crime to question the basis. From the time of speaking, usually only less than a decade of crime can be used to question the credibility of witnesses. Than ten years, the judge questioned whether the referee, upon consent is required to use the proposed party written notice sufficiently in advance to tell each other to ensure fairness. For the pardon, withdrawal, re-power the effectiveness of the certificate. If you had committed a crime, but the recovery of the right to the death penalty is not repeated more than one year sentence or the crime, you can not question the credibility of the previous offense; if the start is innocent, wrongly convicted after the pardon, can not be revoked questioned credibility. For evidence of the crime at a young age can not be used as a general question basis. But in criminal cases, a full 18 years of non-defendant witness testimony is crucial evidence can be questioned. Evidence for the appeal pending question is available, but witnesses could not weaken the religious beliefs and enhanced the credibility of witness testimony.
In conclusion, questioning the credibility of witnesses is very complex, not a single speaking, only the segments in order to reflect the rigor and impartiality of the law of evidence.

Answer 2

你可以登录微软英酷网，一个连《论语》都能翻译的网站。