Question

求大神帮忙翻译：

Lifespan theory brings coherence to these counter-intuitive patterns by contextualizing subjective LS trajectories in terms of key developmental motivations and tasks at each lifestage.For example, given the importance of growth and achievement during adulthood, it can be expected that young adults will generally view their lives as improving over time—even if the degree of positivity of these life evaluations varies between people as a function of individual differences in dispositional optimism. From a lifespan perspective, therefore, inclining subjective LS trajectories among young dispositional pessimists (who, by definition, should expect negative personal future outcomes) and declining trajectories among older dispositional optimists (who should expect positive future outcomes) are neither surprising nor puzzling.
Accordingly, if subjective LS trajectories are contoured by lifestage and if people hold lifestage-specific beliefs concerning how development typically unfolds across the lifespan, then adjusting for group normative LS ratings within age group should resolve the apparent paradoxes. Consistent with this hypothesis, a single dissociative pattern was found in the adjusted subjective LS trajectories for dispositional optimists and pessimists: at each lifestage, dispositional optimists evaluated their lives more positively, and dispositional pessimists evaluated their lives more negatively, than the group norm for each temporal perspective,

Answer 1

Lifespan theory brings coherence to these counter-intuitive patterns by contextualizing subjective LS trajectories in terms of key developmental motivations and tasks at each lifestage. For example, given the importance of growth and achievement during adulthood, it can be expected that young adults will generally view their lives as improving over time—even if the degree of positivity of these life evaluations varies between people as a function of individual differences in dispositional optimism. From a lifespan perspective, therefore, inclining subjective LS trajectories among young dispositional pessimists (who, by definition, should expect negative personal future outcomes) and declining trajectories among older dispositional optimists (who should expect positive future outcomes) are neither surprising nor puzzling.
寿命理论一致性,这些反直觉的模式中将主观LS轨迹的关键在每个lifestage发展动机和任务。例如,鉴于增长和成就的重要性在成年期,可以预期,年轻人将普遍认为他们的生活是改善时,如果这些生活质量评估的程度的积极性不同人与人之间的个体差异的函数性格乐观。从生命周期的角度来看,因此,倾斜主观LS轨迹年轻人性格悲观主义者(根据定义,谁应该负个人未来的结果)和下降轨迹老龄性格乐观主义者(他应该期待积极的未来结果)既不惊讶也不令人费解。
Accordingly, if subjective LS trajectories are contoured by lifestage and if people hold lifestage-specific beliefs concerning how development typically unfolds across the lifespan, then adjusting for group normative LS ratings within age group should resolve the apparent paradoxes. Consistent with this hypothesis, a single dissociative pattern was found in the adjusted subjective LS trajectories for dispositional optimists and pessimists: at each lifestage, dispositional optimists evaluated their lives more positively, and dispositional pessimists evaluated their lives more negatively, than the group norm for each temporal perspective,
因此,如果主观LS轨迹由lifestage波状外形的,如果人们持有lifestage-specific信仰有关开发通常如何展开整个寿命,然后调整组规范LS评级在年龄段应该解决这个明显的矛盾。符合这一假说,单个游离的模式被发现在调整主观LS性格乐观主义者和悲观主义者的轨迹:在每个lifestage,性格乐观评估他们的生活更积极,性格悲观评估他们的生活更消极,比每个时间的团体规范的角度来看,