求中文翻译

AbstractThispapersurveyssomeapplicationsofcooperativegametheorytosupplychainmanagemen... Abstract
This paper surveys some applications of cooperative game theory to supply chain management.Special emphasis is
placed on two important aspects of cooperative games:profit allocation and stability.The paper first describes the con-
struction of the set of feasible outcomes in commonly seen supply chain models,and then uses cooperative bargaining
models to find allocations of the profit pie between supply chain partners.In doing so,several models are analyzed and
surveyed,and include suppliers selling to competing retailers,and assemblers negotiating with component manufacturers
selling complementary components.The second part of the paper discusses the issue of coalition formation among supply
chain partners.An exhaustive survey of commonly used stability concepts is presented.Further,new ideas such as farsight-
edness among supply chain players are also discussed and analyzed.The paper also opens some avenues of future research
in applying cooperative game theory to supply chain management.
1.Introduction
Traditional research in operations management
focused on providing tools and recipes to help deci-
sion makers with tactical operational decisions.
These include production planning,capacity invest-
ment and allocation,inventory decisions on how
much(quantity)and where(location)to produce,
procure and store,shipment schedules,and more
recently,joint pricing and inventory decisions as
well.The tools used in analyzing these problems lar-
gely relied upon dynamic programming and other
optimization techniques.This stream of research
was fruitful in providing practitioners a variety of
algorithms designed to compute optimal quantities,
schedules,etc.,as well as provide theoretical insights
to researchers.
In the last several years,the evolution of supply
chain management recognized that(i)a business
process consists of several decentralized firms
and(ii)operational decisions of these different
entities impact each others’profit,and thus the
profit of the whole supply chain.With thisunderstanding came a great deal of interest in
modeling and understanding the impact of strate-
gic operational decisions of the various players
in supply chains.To e?ectively model and analyze
decision making in such multi-person situation
where the outcome depends on the choice made
by every party,game theory is a natural choice.
Researchers in supply chain management now
use tools from game theory and economics to
understand,predict,and help managers to make
strategic operational decisions in complex multi-
agent supply chain systems.
Loosely speaking,game theory models situations
where players make decisions to maximize their own
utility,while taking into account that other players
are doing the same and that decisions made by play-
ers impact each others utilities.There is a broad
division of game theory into two approaches:the
cooperative and the non-cooperative approach.
展开
baohuzhuoka
2011-01-06 · TA获得超过109个赞
知道小有建树答主
回答量:108
采纳率:0%
帮助的人:70.9万
展开全部
Abstract

文摘

This paper surveys some applications of cooperative game theory to supply chain management. Special emphasis is

该文介绍了其中的一些应用合作博弈理论,以供应链管理特别强调的是

placed on two important aspects of cooperative games:profit allocation and stability. The paper first describes the con-

放在两个很重要的方面合作游戏:利润分配和稳定性本文首先对犯人-

struction of the set of feasible outcomes in commonly seen supply chain models,and then uses cooperative bargaining

可行的领域中的常见预后供应链模型,然后利用合作讨价还价

models to find allocations of the profit pie between supply chain partners. In doing so,several models are analyzed and

模型来找到分配的利润派供应链伙伴之间在这一过程中,各种模式进行了分析和

surveyed,and include suppliers selling to competing retailers,and assemblers negotiating with component manufacturers

接受调查,并卖给竞争包括供应商谈判中汇编零售商及零部件生产商

selling complementary components. The second part of the paper discusses the issue of coalition formation among supply

销售互补的组件。第二部分论述形成联合的探讨这个问题在供应

chain partners. An exhaustive survey of commonly used stability concepts is presented. Further,new ideas such as farsight-

连锁伙伴。一种常用的详细调查了稳定性概念此外,新思想的,如远见的-

edness among supply chain players are also discussed and analyzed. The paper also opens some avenues of future research

edness供应链中球员也作了论述和分析文章还了渠道未来的研究方向

in applying cooperative game theory to supply chain management.

在应用合作博弈理论,以供应链管理。

1.Introduction

1.Introduction

Traditional research in operations management

传统研究在运作管理

focused on providing tools and recipes to help deci-

专注于提供一些有用的工具”来帮助deci -

sion makers with tactical operational decisions.

锡安的制造商了战术运作决策。

These include production planning,capacity invest-

这些包括生产计划,生产能力投资-

ment and allocation,inventory decisions on how

观点和分配、库存决定怎么做

much(quantity)and where(location)to produce,

多(数量),在(位置)生产,

procure and store,shipment schedules,and more

获得和储存、发货日程表,和更多

recently,joint pricing and inventory decisions as

最近,联合定价和库存的决定

well. The tools used in analyzing these problems lar-

好。所使用的工具在分析这些问题lar -

gely relied upon dynamic programming and other

gely动态规划法和依赖

optimization techniques. This stream of research

优化技术。这条小溪的研究

was fruitful in providing practitioners a variety of

多结果子提供多种?从业人员

algorithms designed to compute optimal quantities,

算法优化设计计算数量,

schedules,etc.,as well as provide theoretical insights

时间表,等提供了理论的见解

to researchers.

研究人员。

In the last several years,the evolution of supply

在过去的几年里,进化的供应商

chain management recognized that(i)a business

连锁经营的认识到(我)业务

process consists of several decentralized firms

流程包括一些分散的公司

and(ii)operational decisions of these different

(二)的运作决策方法。本文对这些不同的

entities impact each others’profit,and thus the

实体'profit每个人的影响,因而

profit of the whole supply chain. With thisunderstanding came a great deal of interest in

供应链整体效益与thisunderstanding又来了一个很大的关注

modeling and understanding the impact of strate-

建模和理解迈克尔的影响-

gic operational decisions of the various players

运作决策gic各种各样的球员

in supply chains. To e?ectively model and analyze

在供应链。分别对吗?”进行建模和分析

decision making in such multi-person situation

这样的决策中无一情况

where the outcome depends on the choice made

而在结果取决于选择吗

by every party,game theory is a natural choice.

每个派对,博弈理论是一种自然的选择。

Researchers in supply chain management now

研究人员,在供应链管理了

use tools from game theory and economics to

使用工具从博弈理论和经济学

understand,predict,and help managers to make

认识、预测,帮助管理者

strategic operational decisions in complex multi-

战略的运作决策在复杂的多-

agent supply chain systems.

代理供应链系统。

Loosely speaking,game theory models situations

不严格地说,博弈模型的情况

where players make decisions to maximize their own

在那里玩家作出决定,以最大限度地提高自己

utility,while taking into account that other players

公用事业,而考虑到其他玩家

are doing the same and that decisions made by play-

正在做同样的事,发挥,所作出的决定

ers impact each others utilities. There is a broad

每个人的影响,公用事业存在着广泛

division of game theory into two approaches:the

分裂成两个博弈的方法:

cooperative and the non-cooperative approach.

合作和非合作的途径。

记得采纳哦,经验是关键
IP没有了
2011-01-06 · 超过14用户采纳过TA的回答
知道答主
回答量:91
采纳率:0%
帮助的人:0
展开全部
不会英语
已赞过 已踩过<
你对这个回答的评价是?
评论 收起
推荐律师服务: 若未解决您的问题,请您详细描述您的问题,通过百度律临进行免费专业咨询

为你推荐:

下载百度知道APP,抢鲜体验
使用百度知道APP,立即抢鲜体验。你的手机镜头里或许有别人想知道的答案。
扫描二维码下载
×

类别

我们会通过消息、邮箱等方式尽快将举报结果通知您。

说明

0/200

提交
取消

辅 助

模 式