关于分词做伴随状语和后置定语的问题

我一直以来是这么理解的,请帮我看一下我的理解有没有误:分词做伴随状语时,逻辑主语是句子的主语,要用逗号隔开。现在分词:Sheheldseveralrecords,earn... 我一直以来是这么理解的,请帮我看一下我的理解有没有误:
分词做伴随状语时,逻辑主语是句子的主语,要用逗号隔开。
现在分词:She held several records,earning them when she was 7.
过去分词:I wrote the sang,inspired by kim.
两个句子的主语分别是She和I
分词做后置定语时则不加逗号,修饰其最近的名词。
可是今天遇到了例外,一个是She held speed records,earning them at a time that aviation was so new.
解释说earning跟records离得很近,会造成earning修饰records的错误。可是earning不是本来就该修饰she吗?
另外一个是She held speed records,earned at a time that aviation was so new.
这里解释又说earned是在就近修饰records了。这不就跟上一个句子矛盾了吗?
这个逗号加不加到底有没有影响呢?
展开
 我来答
GTA小鸡
高粉答主

推荐于2017-09-14 · 醉心答题,欢迎关注
知道大有可为答主
回答量:2.6万
采纳率:78%
帮助的人:1.3亿
展开全部
伴随状语相当于两个独立句子。
She held several records, earning them when she was 7. =She held several records.① She earned them when she was 7②
I wrote the sang, inspired by Kim. =I wrote the sang.① I was inspired by Kim②
后置定语相当于定语从句,可以还原为that/which/who等引导的形式,修饰前面的某个名词。是一个句子。
There were some children swimming in the river. = There were some children who were swimming in the river.
She held speed records, earning them at a time that aviation was so new. 这是一个现在分词,是主动语态,说明两个动作主语相同,很明显属于伴随状语,可以拆分为独立的两个句子:She held speed records① She earned them at a time that aviation was so new②
She held speed records, earned at a time that aviation was so new. 这是一个过去分词,表被动语态,很明显是在说recoreds,因为只有records才能be earned,是主语she来earn这个recoreds。是后置定语,相当于She held speed records which were earned at a time that aviation was so new.
逗号和定语/状语没有绝对的对应关系,不能用逗号作为判断是定语还是状语的依据。
alexpascal
高粉答主

2015-09-04 · 醉心答题,欢迎关注
知道顶级答主
回答量:11.2万
采纳率:89%
帮助的人:1.6亿
展开全部
非谓语东子作为修饰语,如果过长,可以逗号将它与被修饰的部分隔开;如果短小精悍,直接和被修饰的部分连接,不用标点隔开。
已赞过 已踩过<
你对这个回答的评价是?
评论 收起
推荐律师服务: 若未解决您的问题,请您详细描述您的问题,通过百度律临进行免费专业咨询

为你推荐:

下载百度知道APP,抢鲜体验
使用百度知道APP,立即抢鲜体验。你的手机镜头里或许有别人想知道的答案。
扫描二维码下载
×

类别

我们会通过消息、邮箱等方式尽快将举报结果通知您。

说明

0/200

提交
取消

辅 助

模 式