
法律英语翻译
Themajoritydisagreedandheldthatdefendant’scattlefeedlotdidnotconstituteanuisance.Them...
The majority disagreed and held that defendant’s cattle feedlot did not constitute a nuisance. The majority rejected subsection(b), Section 826, of the Restatement (Second) of Torts, which permits a finding of nuisance even though the gravity of harm is outweighed by the utility of the conduct if the harm is “serious” and the payment of damages is “feasible” without forcing the business to discontinue.Carpenter v. Double R. Cattle Co.
展开
展开全部
大多数人不同意,认为被告的养牛场不构成妨害。大多数人反对侵权行为重述(第二次),即第826条(b)款,,若损害“严重”,且支付损害赔偿“可行”,企业也不会被迫停止,即使损害严重性超过了行为效用,该款允许认定损害。Carpenter v. Double R. Cattle Co.
推荐律师服务:
若未解决您的问题,请您详细描述您的问题,通过百度律临进行免费专业咨询