Question

求翻译(英译中)

The principal problem today is not at the corporate level, wherehackers break into Web sites and steal intellectual property for resale at aprofit; or take a legitimate copy, duplicate it, and sell it. This problem isnot a serious one in the US and appears rampant only in certain other areas ofthe world.
Because large-scale operations require a complex,highly visiblebusiness infrastructure—with offices, banking arrangements, manufacturing anddistribution channels, accounts with credit card purveyors,warehouses,and otherphysical installations—legal barriers are still effective.
Rather, the greatest threat is widescale individual theft, in whichmany people acting independently use or copy one or more legitimate copies of awork and do not pay the royalties owed to its producers. This is thepublisher’s and content producer’s prime concern, and the first horn of the dilemma.
Publishers and producers wonder if technologies like Napster willmean they can only sell one copy of a workother users will just make freecopies of the initial one. In these days of networks with virtuallyinstantaneous, planetwide access, this publisher’s nightmare is not sofarfetched. How many books, movies, photographs, or musical pieces will contentproducers create and publish online if selling the first electronic copy extinguishesthe entire market.

Answer 1

我很不负责任的去了google translate，翻译以下雀颤：

主要问题今天不是在企业层面，wherehackers打入网站和窃取知识产权转售于aprofit;或采取合法拷贝，复制它，卖掉它。这个问题状态并没有一个严重的问题，在美国，只有在某些其他领域的世界OFTHE出现猖獗。
因为大规模的操作需要一个复杂的，高度visiblebusiness基础设施设有办事处，银行安排，制造ANDDISTRIBUTION渠道，帐户与信用卡的传播者，仓库和otherphysical设施，法律上的障碍仍然是有效的。
相反，最大的威胁是宽比例个人盗窃，在演戏独立使用或复制一顷磨败个或awork更多的正版和不支付结欠其生产商的特许权使用费whichmany人。这是thepublisher及内容生产商的首要关注，而两难的第一号角。
发布者和生产者不知道的技术，如Napster的willmean他们只能卖一workother用户一个副本只会使初始一股freecopies。在网络的virtuallyinstantaneous，planetwide访问的这些天，这个出版商的噩梦是不是sofarfetched。有多少书籍，电影，照片或音乐作品将contentproducers创游孙建和网上发布，如果卖的第一个电子副本extinguishesthe整个市场。

Answer 2

804989982