Question

急求帮忙翻译下面一段话！！！！！！！！

社会经济生活纷繁复杂，法律规范的再详尽也无法面面俱到，囊括所有。而且即使已有的明确规定，因执法者的主观认识不同，也会出现疑难案件。随着社会主义市场经济建立和发展,合同在经济领域中起到了不可替代的桥梁作用,而现实生活中由于诈骗分子近年来常常利用签订经济合同进行诈骗,往往使合同诈骗罪和合同纠纷交织在一起,不易区分。在司法实践中，合同中的纠纷与诈骗的界定，向来是颇为棘手的问题。因此正确的界定和区分合同诈骗罪与合同纠纷,对打击犯罪,保护当事人合法权益具有较大的实践意义。本文通过列举具体案例，从特征方面比较合同诈骗与合同纠纷的异同，然后归纳出合同诈骗罪与合同纠纷的具体界定方法，最后对具体案例进行分析和认定。
不要翻译软件翻的
希望是全手工翻出来的 通顺一点
如果翻的准确到位我再加分

Answer 1

The social economy life is extremely complex, the legal standard exhaustive actually is unable including each aspect.Even if had explicitly stipulated, also can appear the difficult case because of the law enforcement subjective understanding.Along with the socialist market economy establishment and the development, the contract got up the bridge role in the economical domain which could not be substituted.Because in the recent years real life cheated the member frequently touse signs the economic contract to carry on the cheating, often caused the contract cheating crime and the contract dispute is not easy to differentiate.In the contract dispute and the cheating definition in the judicial practice always are the quite thorny question.Therefore the correct discrimination contract cheating crime and the contract dispute, to attack the crime, protects litigant's legitimate rights and interests to have the significant practice significance.This article through enumerates the concrete case,compared with contract cheating and contract dispute similarities and differences from characteristic aspect,then induces the concrete method to define the contract cheating crimeand the contract dispute.Finally, analysis and identification of specific cases.

Answer 2

Social economy life complex complex, the legal standard exhaustive also is unable to attend to every detail again, includes possesses. Moreover even if had the explicit stipulation, is different because of lawman's subjective understanding, also can appear the difficult case. Along with socialist market economy establishment and development,The contract got up the bridge role in the economical domain which could not be substituted,But in real life because the cheating member in recent years frequently carried on the cheating using the sign economic contract,Often causes the contract cheating crime and the contract dispute interweaves in the same place,Not easy to differentiate. In the judicial practice, in the contract dispute and the cheating limits, always are the quite thorny question. Therefore correct limits and discrimination contract cheating crime and contract dispute,To attacks the crime,Protects the litigant legitimate rights and interests to have the big practice significance. This article through enumerates the concrete case, from the characteristic aspect comparison contract cheating and the contract dispute similarities and differences, then induces the contract cheating crime and the contract dispute concrete limits method, finally carries on to the concrete case analyzes and recognized.