翻译成英语 关于医学的

目的:探讨组胺激发试验—气道阻力的测定在学龄前小儿哮喘诊断和疗效判定中的应用方法:利用意大利MEFARMB3激发仪和德国产的Microloop肺功能仪对42例已经诊断为哮... 目的: 探讨组胺激发试验 — 气道阻力的测定在学龄前小儿哮喘诊断和疗效判定中的应用
方法 : 利用意大利 MEFAR MB3激发仪和德国产的Microloop肺功能仪对42例已经诊断为哮喘的病例(其中支气管哮喘27例,咳嗽变异性哮喘15例)和21例健康对照组进行组胺激发试验 — 气道阻力的测定,比较他们之间差异并评价在疗效判定中的价值
结果: 哮喘组和咳嗽变异性哮喘组的气道阻力变化与健康对照组相比较均有统计学意义(F=48.466 P<0.001 )哮喘组治疗3个月以后较治疗前其气道阻力显著降低( t=10.405 P<0.005 )
结论: 组胺激发试验 — 气道阻力的测定在学龄前小儿哮喘的诊断和疗效判定中具有非常良好的应用价值.
关键词: 组胺激发试验 — 气道阻力的测定,学龄前小儿,哮喘诊断,疗效判定

以下是我自己翻译的,由于我不是医学专业的所以有些东西不太懂,语法上可能还有问题,请高手帮助!

Abstract:
Objective: To study the application of histamine provocation test-airway resistance measurement in preschool children’s asthma diagnosis and therapeutic efficacy.

Methods: Compare histamine provocation test-airway resistance measurement by the Italian MEFAR MB3 provocating instrument and Germen Microloop lung function instrument for the 42 cases that were diagnosed as asthmatic and the healthy group of 21 cases, and estimate the differences between the two groups and the value of the therapeutic efficacy.

Results:The comparison between the airway resistance changings to the group of asthma and the cough variant asthma and the group of healthy comparison both have the statistical significance(F=48.466 P<0.001 ). After 3 months of treating the group of asthma, the airway resistance was effectively reduced( t=10.405 P<0.005 ).
Conclusion: Histamine provocation test-airway resistance measurement was of value in the diagnosis and treatment of preschool children with asthma.
Key words: histamine provocation test-airway resistance measurement, preschool children, asthma diagnosis , therapeutic efficacy.
展开
 我来答
旁观者dq
2007-03-23 · TA获得超过225个赞
知道小有建树答主
回答量:145
采纳率:0%
帮助的人:84.6万
展开全部
Objective : Discussion histamine provocation test-airway resistance measured in the diagnosis and treatment of preschool children with asthma, the application : Stir MEFAR NG Italy and Germany to stimulate the production of the 42 cases have Microloop spirometre The diagnosis of asthma patients (27 patients with bronchial asthma. 15 patients with cough variant asthma), and 21 healthy control group histamine provocation test-airway resistance measured They compared the efficacy and to evaluate the difference between the value of the results : asthma and cough variant asthma airway resistance compared with the healthy control group were statistically significant (F=48 . 466 0.001) asthma treatment three months after treatment, their airway resistance decreased significantly (t = 10 . 405 P <0.005) : histamine provocation test-airway resistance measurement in the diagnosis and treatment of preschool children with asthma have very good application value.
wang3188
2007-03-19 · TA获得超过984个赞
知道小有建树答主
回答量:510
采纳率:33%
帮助的人:351万
展开全部
你所翻译的,在语法上基本上没什么问题,但是有些医学术语你表达的不够准确。比如说咳嗽变异性哮喘,我感觉在书上不是这样的。
已赞过 已踩过<
你对这个回答的评价是?
评论 收起
推荐律师服务: 若未解决您的问题,请您详细描述您的问题,通过百度律临进行免费专业咨询

为你推荐:

下载百度知道APP,抢鲜体验
使用百度知道APP,立即抢鲜体验。你的手机镜头里或许有别人想知道的答案。
扫描二维码下载
×

类别

我们会通过消息、邮箱等方式尽快将举报结果通知您。

说明

0/200

提交
取消

辅 助

模 式