Question

英语文章翻译，不要百度翻译啊，都是直译，压根不懂

一、 Similarly ,Sicko,Michael Moore's documentery about the American health-care system,had a deep rather than broad impact .The film ,which made slightly more money than Truth,"has done more for public awareness [of universal health care ] than any other single event in the movement", says Joel Segal ,a staffer assisting Congressman John Conyers on a universal health-care bill. "I don't think it's a coincidence that all the Democratic candidates—presidential and congressional—are pushing universal health care as a front burner issue." A Kaiser Family Foundation poll found that as a result of Sicko , 43% of people were more likely to report that they think health-care reform is needed . however , the effect was not universal—43% of Liberals had a positive view of the film . compared with just 9% of Conservayives.
二、 Do movies make a difference ? They can ,but often not in the way filmmakers hope .
三、 They're not for nonbelievers. They don't make bigots tolerant , Hummer drivers conservationist or burger eaters vegan . Movies make advocates out of supporters. They change the world not in wide swaths of multiplexes but one popcorn bucket at a time .
重点翻译后面两段！！！急！！

Answer 1

一,同样的，《道德败坏的人》,迈克尔·摩尔的文献对美国的医疗保健系统,有一个深而不是广泛的影响。这部电影,这使钱略高于真理,“做了更多的公众意识(关于全额健康保险)比其他任何随着时代潮流的单一事件“,乔尔·西格尔一名职员协助众议员约翰·科尼尔斯在全民医疗法案。“我不认为这是一个巧合,所有的民主党总统国会候选人推动全民医保作为优先地位的问题。“凯塞家庭基金会的一项民意调查发现,由于神经有问题,43%的人更有可能报告他们认为医疗改革是必要的。然而,效果并不是普遍——43%的自由派对这部电影持积极看法。相比之下,只有9%是自然资源保护论者。　　
二、电影能产生影响吗?他们可以,但通常不是以导演希望的方式。　　
三,他们不是不信教。他们不让偏执狂宽容,悍马司机保育人士或汉堡吃素食。电影让拥护者的支持者。他们改变世界不是在宽范围的多放映场影剧院而是每次的一个爆米花桶。

Answer 2

二。电影会产生大的影响吗？当然会，但通常不是以制片人所期望的方式
三。他们不是针对没有信仰的人。他们不会使得偏执狂变得宽容，急躁的司机变得耐心保守亦或是食肉者吃素。电影通过支持者来宣传提倡。他们不是在宽范围内改变世界而是用一个爆米花桶改变着世界。

Answer 3

电影能带来改变吗？可以的，但是通常不是电影制片人希望的那样