Question

哪个英文或者看过这个看过这个案例的法律高手帮我翻译一下，这个案例，谢谢了！！！！！ The Court delive

谢谢！！！！拜托各位高手了
The Court delivered judgment, by 11 votes to 6, in the North Sea Continental Shelf cases.The dispute, which was submitted to the Court on 20 February 1967, related to the delimitation of the continental shelf between the Federal Republic of Germany and Denmark on the one hand, and between the Federal Republic of Germany and the Netherlands on the other. The Parties asked the Court to state the principles and rules of international law applicable, and undertook thereafter to carry out the delimitations on that basis.The Court rejected the contention of Denmark and the Netherlands to the effect that the delimitations in question had to be carried out in accordance with the principle of equidistance as defined in Article 6 of the 1958 Geneva Convention on the Continental Shelf, holding.

Answer 1

在北海大陆架争端一案上，法院以11票对6作出裁决。这是1967年2月20日起诉到法院的争端，涉及到与德国和丹麦联邦共和国大陆架划界，与德意志联邦共和国和荷兰的划界两方面问题。各缔约方要求法院根据国家法的原则和国际法的适用规则，确定出国家边界的划分.法院驳回了丹麦和荷兰的起诉，因为他们的法律依据有问题，国家边界争端应依据1958年日内瓦公约关于大陆架划分的原则。

追问

that the Federal Republic, which had not ratified the Convention, was not legally bound by the provisions of Article 6;that the equidistance principle was not a necessary consequence of the general concept of continental shelf rights, and was not a rule of customary international law.Non-Applicability of Article 6 of the 1958 Continental Shelf Convention (paras. 21-36 of the Judgment)

Answer 2

在北海大陆架诉讼案中，法院以11票对6票作出判决。该诉讼于1967年2月20号提交法院，是有关联邦德国分别与丹麦及荷兰在大陆架划定国界的争端事宜。当事各方请求法院界定有关适用的国际法则和法规，并据此划定国界。法院驳回了丹麦和荷兰的诉讼请求，判决按1958年日内瓦大陆架公约之第六款的相关原则划定国界。

Answer 3

The details of the "Court delivery" need to be provided in order to help him.