Question

跪求翻译~！！ 谢谢~！

From the art of entertaining to the art of survival

We want to make it clear in this article that the way teaching landscape architecture has been thought about is completely wrong，or at least heavily biased by the intellectual ivory tower built in the past centuries．We are inclined to believe that landscape architecture evolved from the art of gardening，because all the history books trace our profession to the origin of gardening．Most of the influential programmes of landscape architecture worldwide evolved from ornamental horticulture and gardening，plus architecture as ornament，and scenery. This intellectual genealogy leads us to think more aesthetically and visually about landscape architecture，and less about the issues of working and production．

It is a mistake to consider landscape architecture as descended from highculture gardening，from the noble classes．If we keep on this track，we are doomed，because this high culture leads only to embellishment and superficiality and can not meet the challenges of today’s environmental problems．High and low culture sees survival very differently．Thinking has to be redirected，and this redirection is deemed to be revolutionary．

The revolutionary way of thinking about the profession of landscape architecture is to redefine landscape architecture as an art of survival．It is an art of working and functioning，the art of field making，irrigation，agricultural planting dealing with flood and drought，selecting sites for cities to avoid natural disasters, selecting sites and orientating houses for people to make use of the land while avoiding the non-beneficial forces of nature．If we can follow this track, making landscape productive，making our cities adaptable and one with the land，and making our buildings hold their place on the land，and making our selves feel at home (meaning being connected to the land，the community and the past)，the landscape is deemed to be safe and healthy, productive，and beautiful．Following this track and to make us someone playing a significant role in facing the contemporary challenge of survival，we need to get out of the beautiful ivory tower and let it become “world heritage”, we have to redefine the profession of landscape architecture as an art of survival，and we need to restructure the educational programmes to make younger generations prepared for the challenges of survival. This revolutionary thinking in educational programmes began in China in the late 1990s.

Answer 1

从艺术娱乐艺术的生存

我们要弄清楚,在这篇文章教学景观建筑已经被考虑是完全错误的,或者至少有偏见的大量知识象牙塔建在过去的centuries.We倾向于相信园林园艺的艺术演变而来的,因为所有的历史书跟踪行业的起源影响项目gardening.Most全球的风景园林观赏园艺和园艺演变而来的,再加上建筑作为点缀,和风景。这个知识谱系想得更使我们对视觉美学景观建筑、和更少的工作环境与发展问题和生产。

这是一个错误的后代景观考虑highculture园艺,从高贵的classes.If我们一直在这条赛道上,我们注定,因为这只会导致高的文化和肤浅,不能满足当今环境的挑战problems.High和低俗的文化生存很differently.Thinking看到必须改变,这重定向被认为是革命性的。

革命的思考方式园林专业的景观重新survival.It的艺术工作是一门艺术,艺术和功能现场制作、灌溉、农业种植处理水灾和旱灾选址城邑,避免自然灾害,选址和定位为百姓用未泡透的房屋,避免利用土地non-beneficial力量的nature.If我们就可以跟这条赛道,使景观生产,使我们城市的土地和适应新环境,使我们的建筑举行的地方在这地方,也有家的感觉,让我们的自我(意思是被连接到土地、社区与以前)、景观被认为是安全、健康、有贡献的,beautiful.Following这条赛道,要叫我们某个人玩上扮演着一个重要的角色面对当代的挑战,我们需要得到生存漂亮的象牙塔,让它成为“世界遗产”,我们不得不重新定位景观专业的生存的艺术,我们需要调整教育方案准备,使年轻一代的挑战的生存。这种革命性的思维在中国开始教育方案是在九十年代末期。