Question

跪求翻译，谢谢。

我认为学生最有资格评价教师的工作。教育就是服务，正如一些宾馆、酒店、银行等一样，教育的本质也是服务——为学生发展服务。宾馆、酒店、银行的服务对象是顾客，不管里面的设施多么齐全、装饰多么豪华，顾客对服务的质量最有发言权。因此，每个宾馆、酒店、银行都会为顾客提供一本意见簿，尽可能地听取顾客意见，改善服务，提高顾客满意度，招徕更多的顾客。学生作为教师工作服务的对象，评价教师工作，难道不是他们最有资格吗？
学生是教育教学活动的主体，直接参与了教师组织的所有的教育教学活动：课堂教学、课间活动和社会实践活动，甚至是师生间的个别谈话、辅导、手把手的示范教学……在这些活动中学生和教师形影不离，全面系统地感受着教师工作的方方面面，包括对教学机智的顿悟、对谆谆教诲的赞同、对情感共鸣的流泪……这一切都是在教师主导下，学生主体作用的充分体现。而其他人员只能通过零散的、片面的途径去了解教师工作，和学生一道听几节课、查阅教师为学生批改的作业等，他们能感受到的是教师在特定时间或某些方面的表现，对教师的评价难免有偏差。笔者曾亲身经历了这样的一件事：一次检查数学教师批改的学生作业，发现一位学生的一次作业字迹端正、书写整洁、全部正确，教师给的评价仅是“良好”，未免有些想不通。通过和学生交谈才知道，原来该生有一道题目是做错的，教师没有批错题符号，先辅导学生订正后再帮他打了“正确”的批阅符号。对于这样别具匠心的批改，不经历过程只看结果有时会产生完全错误的评价。所以说其他人员对教师的评价往往会是“盲人摸象”。

Answer 1

我认为学生最有资格评价教师的工作。
I think the most qualified to evaluate the students' work.

教育就是服务，正如一些宾馆、酒店、银行等一样，教育的本质也是服务——为学生发展服务。
Education is service, as some hotels, hotels, Banks like waiting, the essence of education for students is service - development of service.

宾馆、酒店、银行的服务对象是顾客，不管里面的设施多么齐全、装饰多么豪华，顾客对服务的质量最有发言权。
The guesthouse, the hotel, the bank service object is customer, no matter how complete, the inside of the facilities, how to decorate luxurious customers speak most quality of service.

因此，每个宾馆、酒店、银行都会为顾客提供一本意见簿，尽可能地听取顾客意见，改善服务，提高顾客满意度，招徕更多的顾客。
Therefore, every guesthouse, hotel, Banks will be to provide customers with a guest book, as far as possible to listen to customer input, improve service, improve customer satisfaction, attract more customers.

学生作为教师工作服务的对象，评价教师工作，难道不是他们最有资格吗？
Students as teachers work service object, evaluate teachers' work, don't they most qualified?

学生是教育教学活动的主体，直接参与了教师组织的所有的教育教学活动：课堂教学、课间活动和社会实践活动，甚至是师生间的个别谈话、辅导、手把手的示范教学……
Students are the subject of education teaching activities, directly involved in the teacher education teaching all the organization activity: classroom teaching, break activities and social practice, even between teachers and students in the individual conversation, tutoring, intended to demonstration teaching...

在这些活动中学生和教师形影不离，全面系统地感受着教师工作的方方面面，包括对教学机智的顿悟、对谆谆教诲的赞同、对情感共鸣的流泪……
In these activities, students and teachers were inseparable-kivi systematically feeling all aspects of the teachers work, including the teaching of the enlightenment, wit the inculcation of emotional resonance approval, the tears...

这一切都是在教师主导下，学生主体作用的充分体现。
All this is in the teachers' leading role and students' subject full embodiment.

而其他人员只能通过零散的、片面的途径去了解教师工作，和学生一道听几节课、查阅教师为学生批改的作业等，他们能感受到的是教师在特定时间或某些方面的表现，对教师的评价难免有偏差。
And other personnel only through scattered partially way to understand teachers' work, and students a listen to what lessons, consult teachers for correcting the homework, students they can feel is that teachers in a specific time or some aspects of the performance evaluation of teachers, is hard to avoid deviation.

笔者曾亲身经历了这样的一件事：一次检查数学教师批改的学生作业，发现一位学生的一次作业字迹端正、书写整洁、全部正确，教师给的评价仅是“良好”，未免有些想不通。
The author once has personally experienced such a thing: an examination of correcting the students' homework teachers of mathematics, found a student's time the operating right, writing neat handwriting, all right, the teacher give evaluation is only "good", is some think impassability.

通过和学生交谈才知道，原来该生有一道题目是做错的，教师没有批错题符号，先辅导学生订正后再帮他打了“正确”的批阅符号。
Through and students talk just know, originally the student have a topic is doing wrong, teachers did not approve the wrong topic symbols, first counsels the student to help him again after correction played "correct" reviews symbols.

对于这样别具匠心的批改，不经历过程只看结果有时会产生完全错误的评价。
For such does not provide craftsmanship, don't experience process to correct and only see results sometimes produce completely wrong evaluation.

所以说其他人员对教师的评价往往会是“盲人摸象”。
So says other personnel to teacher evaluation will often is "MangRenMoXiang".

Answer 2

我叫张浩然，前几天，我晚上回家时，被一辆大卡车撞死了，司机将我的尸体抛入了路径边的小河里，然后逃走了，你看见了这条消息后，请将它发给4个论坛，如果没有发，你的妈妈会在1个月被车撞死，你的爸爸会得绝症，如果你照着上面做了，在5天后，你喜欢的人也会喜欢你
我很害怕才发这个的。. 各位 对不起 千万别进来 ~~

Answer 3

I think the most qualified to evaluate the students' work. Education is service, as some hotels, hotels, Banks like waiting, the essence of education for students is service - development of service. The guesthouse, the hotel, the bank service object is customer, no matter how complete, the inside of the facilities, how to decorate luxurious customers speak most quality of service. Therefore, every guesthouse, hotel, Banks will be to provide customers with a guest book, as far as possible to listen to customer input, improve service, improve customer satisfaction, attract more customers. Students as teachers work service object, evaluate teachers' work, don't they most qualified?
Students are the subject of education teaching activities, directly involved in the teacher education teaching all the organization activity: classroom teaching, break activities and social practice, even between teachers and students in the individual conversation, tutoring, intended to demonstration teaching... In these activities, students and teachers were inseparable-kivi systematically feeling all aspects of the teachers work, including the teaching of the enlightenment, wit the inculcation of emotional resonance approval, the tears... All this is in the teachers' leading role and students' subject full embodiment. And other personnel only through scattered partially way to understand teachers' work, and students a listen to what lessons, consult teachers for correcting the homework, students they can feel is that teachers in a specific time or some aspects of the performance evaluation of teachers, is hard to avoid deviation. The author once has personally experienced such a thing: an examination of correcting the students' homework teachers of mathematics, found a student's time the operating right, writing neat handwriting, all right, the teacher give evaluation is only "good", is some think impassability. Through and students talk just know, originally the student have a topic is doing wrong, teachers did not approve the wrong topic symbols, first counsels the student to help him again after correction played "correct" reviews symbols. For such does not provide craftsmanship, don't experience process to correct and only see results sometimes produce completely wrong evaluation. So says other personnel to teacher evaluation will often is "MangRenMoXiang".

Answer 4

这么长的文章翻译呃 居然米有悬赏~~LZ太抠了吧
所以你得到的回答只能是机器翻译滴~~~

追问

不是我吝啬，而是系统说我的财富值过低，不够悬赏，抱歉。

追答

好吧~~~~不过你的文章篇幅实在是太长了

Answer 5

I think the most qualified students to evaluate the work of teachers. Education is the service, as some hotels, hotels, banks, etc., as the essence of education is also a service - the development of services for students. Guesthouses, hotels, banks serving the customer, no matter how complete the facilities inside, how luxurious decoration, customer service quality, most have a say. Therefore, each hotel, hotels, banks will provide customers with a guestbook, as much as possible to listen to customer feedback, improve services, improve customer satisfaction and attract more customers. Services to students as the object of teachers, teacher evaluation, are not they the most qualified?
Teaching students the subject of education, teacher organizations directly involved in the teaching of all activities: classroom teaching, recess activities, and social practice, and even individual conversations between teachers and students, counseling, hands-on demonstration of teaching ... ... In these inseparable of college students and teachers, comprehensive and systematic manner all aspects of the work of teachers feel, including teaching witty insight, the endorsement of the inculcation of emotional resonance of tears ... ... all this under the guidance of teachers, the role of the full student body expression. While the others only by scattered, one-sided approach to understand the teachers, and students listen to a few classes together, check mark the work of teachers and other students, they can feel the teachers at a particular time or the performance of certain aspects of , the evaluation of teachers inevitably bias. I have personally experienced such a thing: a check mark in the student mathematics teachers work, the students found a job writing a correct, neat writing, all right, to the evaluation of teachers is only "good" was somewhat puzzled . And students know through talking to the original topic of the student have a wrong, the teacher did not issue the wrong question symbols, revised after the first counsel students to help him fight the "right" marking symbols. Correcting for such ingenuity, not through the process will sometimes look at the results of the evaluation completely wrong. So the evaluation of teachers, other staff often is "Mangrenmoxiang."